patrick.net

One of the industrial whistle blowers, who I only heard once, said that the manufacturing of such large numbers of vials so quickly meant extremely poor quality control. Since Pharma owns the FDA, regulation and quality assurance are out the window. Nobody knows what shit is in there. Aside from democide, the whole gimmicky vax and Covid shit were laundering mechanisms to funnel money back to political investors. The more ampules, the more billions were heaped on them from the tax kitty.

I'm pretty sure now that half the shit that comes with some packaged warning with side effects have never been adequately field tested, contrary to claims and requirements. Pharma just pays off FDA and the peer review gauntlet, prints some random shit on a piece of paper, and includes it with the drugs.

Rockefeller Medicine is more interested in keeping us sick with chronic and acute diseases to buy their ratgut petroleum based Pharma. That is well established.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture

I am guessing the eficiency of bacterial plasmids transfecting bacteria in the human body is logs higher than transfecting eukarytoic cells.

Publications demonstrating the in vitro reverse trancription of the spike protein mRNA into DNA are also quite troubling.

Operation Warp Speed!

Sorry, I like my medicine to be carefully crafted, not rushed through production with low purity standards and no long term testing data.

Pass.

Patrick says

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture

In politics, regulatory capture (also agency capture and client politics) is a form of corruption of authority that occurs when a political entity, policymaker, or regulator is co-opted to serve the commercial, ideological, or political interests of a minor constituency, such as a particular geographic area, industry, profession, or ideological group.

This has actual traditionally been taught in business school - When a regulatory agency is first formed, it acts like a crusader to right the abuses. But over time, the regulatory agency becomes an ally of the businesses they are supposed to police.

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-vax-gene-files-have-the-regulators-approved-a-trojan-horse/

Patrick says

If McKernan’s vials are typical of what was injected into billions of people, we are looking at a pharmaceutical blunder millions of times worse than the Tuskegee experiments. ...

So what if it it's a million times worse than the Tuskegee experiments? What happened to the Megeles that ran the Tuskegee experiments? Jack fucking shit.

I agree that hangings are in order, but I don't see how that is going to happen except at the end of 300,000,000 burning torches and sharpened pitchforks.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/bat-brained-wednesday-november-1

Epoch reported it has followed up with a public records request seeking to know when the FDA first found out about the contamination problem. The FDA has refused to expedite the request, denying it implicates any safety issues. So it will be a few months.

I was amused at Epoch’s comment that Pfizer and BioNTech did not respond to inquiries. Shocker.

As I’ve said before, I think this issue — the issue of contaminants in the shots — will be what finally rips open the whole corrupt piñata. Our people have the scent now, and I think it is only a matter of time.

And remember — this contamination issue is separate from the question of whether mRNA drugs are safe at all, even if they’re not contaminated. The answer to that one is ‘no,’ full stop. We’ll get that one dialed in, too.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/the-vanishing-wednesday-november

💉 The drums keep drumming as Pfizer’s stock price continues to swirl around the toilet bowl. Last month, a preprint written by five researchers (including Jessica Rose and Kevin McKernan) published with the somewhat wordy title, “DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events.




Pandemic hero Kevin McKernan first detected the “unexpected” DNA in the covid jabs early this year, and since then the momentum has only increased. Last month’s preprint measured the levels of contamination found in vials from those batches and compared them to reports of adverse events. The graph above shows that they generally found more unexpected plasmid DNA contamination (blue) in Pfizer’s shot than even expected spike mRNA (red). Moderna’s shot ran about 50% contamination.

The FDA’s current limit for allowable DNA contamination in a medical product is 10 parts per billion, written as 10 ng (nanograms). This limit is sort of like the old legend about the FDA’s limits on how much cockroach protein is allowed in fast food products. Anyway, using one method (fluorometry), the authors found orders of magnitude more contaminant than should have been allowed.

Here are the authors’ conclusions, marked for my notes, below:

These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in the modRNA COVID-19 products tested. Using fluorometry, all products tested exceeded the guidelines for residual DNA set by the FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 to 509-fold.(1) Our findings extend existing concerns about vaccine safety and call into question the relevance of guidelines conceived before the introduction of efficient transfection using LPs.(2) With several obvious limitations, we urge that our work is replicated under forensic conditions and that guidelines be revised to account for highly efficient DNA transfection and cumulative dosing.(3) ...

(1) First of all, the FDA implicitly admitted there is contaminant DNA in the vaccines, which it called “residual,” referring to e-coli left over from the vaccine manufacturing process. So now everyone agrees on that point. But FDA concluded “no safety concerns … have been identified.” In other words, they’re not saying there aren’t concerns. They just haven’t identified the concerns yet.

I’m not holding my breath.

(2) The FDA also admitted there are theoretical concerns. So, there are concerns, which it agreed have been raised. Then the FDA played a version of the “no evidence” card, which as you know, involves picking and choosing which actual evidence to count as “valid.” In other words, available evidence is not the same as just evidence, as we will see.

It’s great! You can support pretty much any conclusion you want using the “available evidence” technique. Available evidence supports the conclusion that the moon landing was faked. So there. Available evidence, helpfully provided by the CIA, supports the conclusion that JFK was assassinated by a lone gunman. Et cetera.

(3) In case there was any doubt, the FDA explicitly agreed the shots are contaminated, but minimized the significance of that fact by calling the amounts “minute” and “residual,” as if “residual” contamination is better than other kinds of contamination. These are meaningless nonsense adjectives. Minute? Of course they’re minute. It’s DNA. All DNA is minute, morons.

Every so often you have to pause and marvel at how people this dumb could have pulled off the whole covid caper. It is kind of like if the short bus accidentally turned left into the nuclear power station’s parking lot, and then the specially-abled students on the bus invented fusion. And then while everybody was high-fiving and giving them awards, the core exploded.

Anyway. The FDA is just playing games with the definition of the word “minute.” The agency used the logical fallacy of equivocation, a type of rhetorical sleight-of-hand to fool us into thinking they’re saying the amount of contamination is minute relative to something else, which they never name. The implication is there isn’t enough contamination to make people sick. But they can’t say that, because they have no idea (or don’t want to say). Or they would have said it, believe me.

Next, the FactCheck.org trotted out the most-favorite logical fallacy, the appeal to authority. In other words, they cited their cherry-picked experts, who of course said everything is just fine:

Various experts also told us that it is unlikely that residual DNA in the vaccines could integrate into DNA or cause cancer, even in theory. And as we have previously written, there isn’t evidence to date that the vaccines cause cancer or have led to an increase in cancer.
Haha! Once again, they unintentionally admitted everything. First of all, only “various” experts — who are not named, so they’re probably Pfizer whitecoats — and not all experts, or even most experts — but the various experts said the contamination was unlikely to cause problems.

Unlikely!

Unlikely does not mean, “impossible.” It doesn’t not mean, “almost impossible.” It’s more of an expression of doubt, a weasel word designed to reassure gullible people. It also does NOT mean the ‘unlikely’ thing referred to is good. It could be bad. It’s probably very bad. You don’t need an umbrella in the car, it’s unlikely to rain today. Just expense it, you’re unlikely to get audited by the IRS. Don’t worry, go ahead, your wife is unlikely to find out.

Next, FactCheck has apparently given up and is now just admitting that some of the contamination is from the SV40 monkey-virus DNA that is, in fact, in the shots. SV40 wasn’t disclosed in the Pfizer and Moderna EUA applications, and for most of this year the officials have robustly denied it, but Kevin McKernan quickly found a way to show it so plainly that that they’ve now had to retreat to arguing about whether it matters.

Anyway, here’s what FactCheck said about SV40, first calling it a “possibility” but then confirming it as a “fact” in the very next sentence:

Some of the alleged concern has focused on the possibility, raised in the original preprint, that some of the residual DNA in the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine is from a monkey virus called SV40. The EMA confirmed to us that the plasmid, or DNA template, used to make the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine contains some short sections of DNA from this virus. A Pfizer spokesperson also told us via email that “specific, non-infectious parts of the SV40 sequence, which are commonly used in the pharmaceutical industry are present in starting material used by Pfizer and BioNTech.”
Maybe someday someone will ask why the SV40 monkey virus is in the shots’ DNA formula in the first place. Why is it “residual” if it is in the formula? Where did it ‘reside’ to begin with? In monkeys? How did it get from the monkeys to the shots? Monkey business? FactCheck.org didn’t say. For now, all they offer are “various experts” who think, based on “available evidence,” it is “unlikely” that the monkey virus DNA — however it got there — can hurt anybody.

Next, right after saying how there was “no available evidence” that the contaminants, including the SV40 DNA, could possibly cause cancer, the FactCheck.org article described some evidence. It was in the form of a September hearing in South Carolina, where Dr. Buckhaults testified as an expert saying it was “likely” the contaminant DNA would integrate with people’s own cells. ...

The DNA cat is out of the mRNA bag. My best guess is this is why Wall Street fled Pfizer and Moderna this year. Everyone knows the ugly end is coming. It’s just a matter of time now.