« First « Previous Comments 27 - 66 of 97 Next » Last » Search these comments
Hell my gas is paid for by my wife's company and I don't work for it. Thing is it's the little things that aren't technically illegal that people get away with. Wife sells $6,000,000 annually cash and my $2,000 of gas is a nothing burger. And they know.
This new law is yet another push towards communism by the Evan Lows and Richard Pans of the Democrat party. An attempt to vicariously claim via lie that people steal because they are poor and victims of systemic racism, another fabricated fairly tale of the communists.
patrick
What happened to comment 21 above?
The stated policy of management was to "let them go and do not confront them."
RayAmerica says
The stated policy of management was to "let them go and do not confront them."
What is the point of checking receipts at the door then? Just to keep track of how many people stole things?
That comment was definitely a personal insult.
Can employees steal without being fired now?
Thoughts?
Not at all. At that age I was a total delinquent that stole frequently, but I will admit that those were the acts of a thief. But as an adult I changed my behavior. The issue is not that you were only 17, it is that today you consider the activity you did then as not really stealing, and even today you said you pilfer gas from your wife's employer. Kid's make mistakes, which is why it was my policy was never to prosecute anyone under 18 for shoplifting or pilfering. A adult should have matured to the point of having integrity.
CA raised the grand theft limit to $950 a while back. And now they passed a bill making it illegal for employer to require employees to confront thieves/shoplifters.
For their safety, I don’t think employees should do this anyway and I don’t think it was happening much.
With shoplifting there was always grey area… if I walk out with these, will someone confront me. What risk am I taking by trying to walk out with his iPhone charger?
But with this bill, isn’t it open season? $950 and it’s illegal to try and stop me?
For the record, I don’t give much of a shit about corporations and their profits. However, I’m seeing a lot more shit locked up in stores and store theft is all over nextdoor with people saying that so and so just walked right out without paying.
Thoughts?
You don't think for a moment "am I possibly a kind of shitty person?"
I wouldn't notice spending an extra $2,000 a year, that's why I wouldn't be a thief. It's not about money, it's about personal integrity. Doesn't this even occur to you?
BayArea says
Thoughts?
There has always existed a rather thin line that separates our society from the law-abiding to the lawless. That line has now been officially crossed by the lawless, along with those politicians that support them, and the results will be continual chaos.
You straightened your shit out, because of the ramifications of your actions.
How about the company stealing from my wife by not paying her what anyone with those sales numbers makes.
Jealousy of others is a tough pill to swallow.
So now it is reparations? If your wife is not being paid enough, then she should ask for a raise or work for an employer who will pay her more. If no raise is forthcoming and no other employer will pay her more, then she is being paid what she is worth. That is true for any employee.
WookieMan says
Jealousy of others is a tough pill to swallow.
How arrogant and how grabbing at straws. Nobody is jealous of you, anymore than anyone who protests Lia Thomas is just jealous of "her" winning. Most people on this blog seem to be well accomplished on their own.
Integrity has different forms.
Would you turn down a hot wife that makes $300k?
People want what they cannot have.
I hope you enjoy Montana though.
25 years this November. In modern times let me know if you've been with the same person that long.
But so is honest pursuit of what one desires.
A combination of these 2 things makes everyone pay more for goods as retailers have to charge more to compensate for theft losses.
For the record, I don’t give much of a shit about corporations and their profits. However, I’m seeing a lot more shit locked up in stores and store theft is all over nextdoor with people saying that so and so just walked right out without paying.
Kid's make mistakes, which is why it was my policy was never to prosecute anyone under 18 for shoplifting or pilfering
Integrity? This surely is in jest. How about the company stealing from my wife by not paying her what anyone with those sales numbers makes.
This is the classic response we get and I'm used to it. Jealousy of others is a tough pill to swallow.
Then she can ask for a raise, or quit and get another job. You have an entitlement complex. If she's so valuable and indispensable, surely she can get a larger salary or leave.
This is typical. I'm disgusted with you, I'm not jealous of you.
You are though. You do nothing. You program computers/sites and do nothing else. Bitch here to an active crowd of 50 and maybe 500 active lurkers. You're not elected.
When was the last time you even left California?
Did anything of note? You sit here and bitch and moan yet do NOTHING about it.
You still don't realize that yet.
You have to stop saying that to a person that IS doing something. Has done something. I get the system far beyond what you even think you know.
Listen, as much of a creep as he is, I know the former speaker of the House, Denny Hastert. Know him.
Instead of getting hung up on Iraq, maybe get involved at the county level.
I'm sick of people bitching about national politics when they don't do shit locally.
You know an unconvicted pedophile who had one victim
Unconvicted??? What the hell are you talking about? Shows me you have no clue WTF you're talking about and all future comments should be treated as bull shit.
I'm not going to address all your other crap and basically spam at this point. It's the same thing over and over and over. You can't even get facts about the Speaker of the House being convicted of fucking around with a kid. Who cares if it was 1 or 10? You got the facts wrong.
Post a link as you say. Prove me wrong. Hastert went to jail for christ sake.
In May 2015, Hastert was indicted on federal charges of structuring bank withdrawals to evade bank reporting requirements and making false statements to federal investigators. Federal prosecutors said that the funds withdrawn by Hastert were used as hush money to conceal his past sexual misconduct.
.
.
.
In court submissions filed in April 2016, federal prosecutors alleged that Hastert had molested at least four boys as young as 14 years of age during his time as a high school wrestling coach. At a sentencing hearing, Hastert admitted that he had sexually abused boys whom he had coached. Referring to Hastert as a "serial child molester", a federal judge imposed a sentence of 15 months in prison, two years' supervised release, and a $250,000 fine.
Federal prosecutors said that the funds withdrawn by Hastert were used as hush money to conceal his past sexual misconduct.
Oh good for you. You know an unconvicted pedophile who had one victim (Steven Reinboldt) commit suicide who was controlled by the intelligence agencies, and sold out the country to protect himself from exposure.
Do you read what you're typing?? He was jailed for fucking around with a kid.
You can split hairs all you want. I can give you $15k a day for fun and see what happens.
No, they didn't charge him with child rape as the cash payments were current. He skirted the law and didn't get charged with what he should have been.
I'm sorry. You act like an authority of knowledge but know dick to be honest. Do you know one person in federal government that you could call? One?
You don't know the system at all. Your sources are generally bull shit artists trying to monetize a channel.
Let me know when you're elected to something of relevance
You think you know, but you don't.
Otherwise known as the 'Destroy The Remaining Businesses That Haven't Already Bailed Out' Law.
« First « Previous Comments 27 - 66 of 97 Next » Last » Search these comments
SB 553, introduced by Silicon Valley’s State Sen. Dave Cortese (D-Cupertino), is described as a bill to prevent and monitor “workplace violence.” But it also includes a provision that “every employer shall establish, implement, and maintain, at all times in all of the employer’s facilities, a workplace violence prevention plan for purposes of protecting employees and other personnel from aggressive and violent behavior at the workplace” that “shall include … [p]rovisions prohibiting the employer from maintaining policies that require employees to confront active shooters or suspected shoplifters.”
As San Francisco Bay Area Fox affiliate KTVU reported, retail associations are furious, believing that the bill will tell potential thieves that they can steal goods at will:
[O]ver 50 organizations, including the California Retailers Association, (CRA) don’t support the bill.
“This bill goes way too far, number one, where I think it will open the doors even wider for people to come in and steal from our stores.”
…
The CRA says if SB 553 becomes law, it will need to apply to all industries and not just retail. They also say most retailers already prohibit regular employees from approaching anyone about stolen merchandise and have some employees who are trained in theft prevention.
“It says no employee can approach someone who is shoplifting. So even if someone is trained on how to deter someone from doing that, now they’re not allowed to approach someone. So, what does that mean? We are opening up the door to allow people to walk into stores, steal and walk out,” Michelin said.
https://www.breitbart.com/crime/2023/06/07/california-senate-passes-bill-preventing-employers-from-requiring-staff-to-stop-shoplifters/