« First « Previous Comments 1,531 - 1,570 of 1,661 Next » Last » Search these comments
The latest release of Jeffrey Epstein’s email archive has detonated another political nuke in the form of a 2016 message in which the child predator appeared to allege that Hillary Clinton was engaged in an illicit affair with her husband’s former White House Deputy Counsel Vince Foster.
House Democrats released the trove this week, and among the communications is a May 25, 2016 email exchange between Epstein and disgraced author Michael Wolff. Wolff asked Epstein for a “thumb nail” summary on “Nussbaum/foster.”
Epstein replied with a cryptic line that directly raised eyebrows: “nussbaum white house counsel. . hillary doing naughties with vince.”
The message appears to reference Bernard Nussbaum, President Bill Clinton’s White House Counsel, and Vince Foster, who was found dead in 1993 under circumstances that have fueled controversy for more than 30 years.
Foster, a longtime Clinton confidant from Arkansas, died from a gunshot wound to the head on July 20, 1993, at Fort Marcy Park in Virginia.
Multiple official investigations ultimately ruled Foster’s death a “suicide.” ...
The inconsistencies were documented in investigative reports, media archives, and congressional records.
Among them:
• Minimal blood at the scene
Foster was shot in the mouth with a .38-caliber revolver, with the bullet exiting the back of his skull.
Experts have long pointed out that such an injury should have produced massive blood loss, skull fragments, and brain matter.
Instead, reports described only a small trickle from the mouth and nose and no significant pooling under his head, despite the body lying on an incline.
• Contradictions about the gun
Paramedics reported the body was in a different position than police photos.
The gun was found clutched unnaturally in Foster’s right hand with his thumb jammed inside the trigger guard, a position difficult to reconcile with recoil from a suicide shot.
No fingerprints were found on the weapon, not even Foster’s.
• The missing bullet
Investigators never recovered the bullet, adding to long-standing suspicion that the shooting may have occurred elsewhere.
• Undisclosed physical evidence
Reports noted blond hair and carpet fibers on Foster’s clothing and semen stains in his underwear, details that fueled additional speculation.
• Questionable investigative conduct
The Orlando Sentinel reported in 1994 that the Park Police “botched much of” the initial investigation, losing skull fragments, failing to locate the bullet, and underexposing an entire roll of crime-scene film.
When investigators later attempted to develop the film, it was unusable.
• Conflicting forensic findings
Fiske’s own pathologists later reported:
“The finding of the head facing forward and the right-sided blood stains are mutually exclusive.”
The pathologists’ findings suggest the body may have been moved.
• Damage from the White House response
One of the most controversial elements came the day after the death, when Nussbaum blocked FBI agents from searching Foster’s office.
According to reports, Nussbaum even ordered an agent to sit in a chair and “not rise from it again” while White House personnel went through Foster’s files.
Epstein Email Fuels Fire on the Eve of Renewed Public Scrutiny
The Epstein–Wolff exchange is certain to intensify long-running questions about the Clintons, as the message explicitly ties Hillary Clinton to Foster in a sexual context.
It’s an explosive allegation given the historical suspicion surrounding his death and the decades of controversy over the Clintons’ political operations.
The line “hillary doing naughties with vince” remains unexplained, and Wolff has not commented.
Jeffrey Epstein claimed he gave Russians insight into Trump
Newly released emails show the late convicted sex offender’s extensive network of foreign contacts, whom he corresponded with about Trump’s policy decisions.
Nearly a month before President Donald Trump met Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Helsinki in 2018, Jeffrey Epstein attempted to pass a message to Russia’s top diplomat: If you want to understand Trump, talk to me.
“I think you might suggest to putin that lavrov can get insight on talking to me,” Epstein wrote in a June 24, 2018, email to Thorbjorn Jagland, a former prime minister of Norway who was leading the Council of Europe at the time of the exchange. Lavrov was an apparent reference to Sergei Lavrov, Russia’s longtime foreign minister.
In the email exchange, one of hundreds released Wednesday by congressional investigators, Epstein indicated he had previously talked about Trump with Vitaly Churkin, Russia’s forceful ambassador to the United Nations, before Churkin died in 2017.
“Churkin was great,” Epstein, the late convicted sex offender, wrote. “He understood trump after our conversations. it is not complex. he must be seen to get something its that simple.”
The exchange was among dozens that showcase Epstein’s extraordinary network of international associates, whom he often corresponded with about Trump’s first-term policy decisions.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the emails, but press secretary Karoline Leavitt said at a briefing Wednesday the broader set of emails “prove absolutely nothing other than President Trump did nothing wrong.” ...
In the emails, Jagland said he was meeting Lavrov’s assistant the following day and would suggest a connection with Epstein. It’s unclear if anything ever came of the proposed contact. ...
“Do the Russians have stuff on Trump? Today was appalling even by his standards,” wrote Larry Summers, the former Clinton administration Treasury secretary and Obama administration economic adviser, in an email to Epstein on July 16, 2018, the day of the Helsinki summit with Putin.
“My email is full with similar comments. wow,” Epstein replied the next day. “Im sure his view is that it went super well. he thinks he has charmed his adversary.. Admittedly he has no idea of the symbolism. He has no idea of most things.” He also called Trump’s handling of the summit with Putin “predictable.”
Summers did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Days later, Epstein was flexing his overseas relationships in an email exchange with former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, telling him in a July 23, 2018, message that Bannon needed to be physically present in Europe to wield influence on the continent. ...
Epstein often relied on his foreign contacts to learn about their views of Trump as he obsessively tracked the new president’s actions. And at other times, he simply showcased his deep connections around the world in emails with other associates.
“Can you belive MBS sent me a TENT carpets and all,” Epstein wrote to billionaire businessman Tom Pritzker in December 2016, referring to Mohammed bin Salman, who is now the Saudi crown prince.
“A tent? Hmmm…” Pritzker wrote back. “I think that is code for ‘I love you’. Or, maybe code for ‘go pound sand’. Better check your [Kingdom of Saudi Arabia] urban dictionary.”
Pritzker did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A year before he reached out to Jagland for help with the Russians, Jagland asked Epstein to visit him in Strasbourg, France, so Epstein could help him “understand more about Trump and what’s going on in the American society.”





Flight manifests
goofus says
Flight manifests
To St. Thomas. No runway on Little St. James. I'm implicated if we go by that.

It was manifests from Epstein’s own 727 we’re going off of (not every tourist to the area).
So who says high profile people don't fly in on a United or American flights first class and then go to the island? How would you know if I went or didn't? Same for the people on Epstein's manifests. There are better spots than his island on St. Thomas and St. John. Maybe he just gave them a lift.
Trump Orders DOJ to Investigate Epstein’s Ties to Top Democrats
President Donald Trump has just announced that he has directed Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to launch a full investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s connections to high-profile Democrats.
The DOJ will also investigate Epstein’s ties to major financial institutions.
In a Friday statement, Trump warned that Democrats are weaponizing the “Epstein Hoax” to distract from their political failures.
There is a huge contradiction here between Trump claiming it's a hoax somehow, and doing this investigation.
Twenty-four hours after House Speaker Mike Johnson announced an pending vote to “compel” the DOJ to release the Epstein files, President Trump shocked the world by demanding an investigation of people named in the Epstein disclosures, including (but not limited to) Bill Clinton, former Harvard President Larry Summers, billionaire Democrat donor Reid Hoffman, and mega-bank J.P. Morgan-Chase. ...
The Times never saw this coming. The article practically gasped with shock, angrily reminded readers about the DOJ’s unsigned July memo closing the investigation, and frantically speculated that Trump only opened these new investigations so DOJ would have an excuse not to turn over its Epstein files because of pending investigations.
Nobody knows Trump’s plan, it is brimming with strategic ambuiguity, which has become Trump 2.0’s hallmark. But it was still politically brilliant, in a dizzying array of ways. Let us count them.
First, criminal investigations are at least part of what Trump’s MAGA critics have long said they wanted. It will be up to the US Attorney to decide whether he’s got enough evidence to defeat tall-building criminal defense attorneys and support any high-profile arrests. But it seems the investigations will soon be underway (if they weren’t already in progress).
Second, this puts high-profile Democrats, including former President Clinton, in play. In a hostile op-ed yesterday, the Washington Post editorial board called Trump’s move “escalation,” and predicted it would eventually backfire. “Trump is keeping the story alive,” the editors sneered. Someone is. But maybe the high-profile Democrats in the crosshairs would prefer the story to quietly die.
Third, Trump’s turnaround raises the stakes on all further disclosures. Each new tranche raises the stakes for whoever appears in them. The more stuff that comes out, the more “many other people and institutions” will require scrutiny. ...
Beyond the initial three emails that Democrats unsuccessfully tried to mischaracterize, Wednesday’s dump of 20,000 new documents is beginning to bear fruit.
So far, the new documents have revealed media collaborating with Epstein against Trump (in yesterday’s post), a growing narrative in Epstein’s own sloppy words that he perceived Trump to be his Great Nemesis, and evidence that Epstein thus tried to destroy Trump by conspiring with media and House Democrats.
The emerging picture is of an Epstein who was terrified of Trump. Leading up to the billionaire’s arrest, he increasingly wanted to injure Trump, and created a false narrative that he, Epstein, was the ultimate Trump weapon. Gullible reporters, Democrats, and Trump enemies believed Epstein, which also gave him a huge public relations boost.
I’m not the only one saying it. Yesterday, after reviewing the latest Epstein documents, the Washington Post ran an astonishing story under this headline:
After Trump Split, Epstein Said He Could 'Take Him Down'
Jeffrey Epstein cast himself as a Trump insider and wanted to
leverage potentially damaging information about the president
and his business dealings, according to emails with associates.
... The emails and text messages from the latest dump show that Epstein smelled a rat. He suspected that Trump was behind all his criminal problems. He began to counterattack, and communicated with any Trump enemy who’d listen, up and down the progressive food chain. This revived the convicted pedophile’s flagging fortunes, since progressives happily overlooked his sordid criminal history, since Epstein could help them take out the Bad Orange Man.
So far, and don’t miss this, we’ve seen not a single email or text between Trump and Epstein. Zero. From the documents, it looks like they never spoke. Everything the media has published to date is just Epstein obsessively chatting about Trump.
Four months before his second, final, and fatal arrest, Epstein was apparently watching the live broadcast of a February, 2019 impeachment hearing with great interest, frantically texting ideas and suggestions with House Rep. Stacey Plaskett (D-USVI), who was sitting front and center:
Not coincidentally, a 2023 Business Insider story broke the news that Epstein had generously donated to Stacey’s 2018 campaign...
Last night, Plaskett admitted the texting had happened, but brushed it off as constituent communications. “During the hearing, Congresswoman Plaskett received texts from staff, constituents, and the public at large offering advice, support, and in some cases partisan vitriol, including from Epstein,” the statement said.
Whatever you think about this ghastly Democrat pay-for-play stuff, it proves beyond argument that Epstein was doing everything he could to hurt Trump, but had no real ammunition.
Indeed, in the many emails and text messages between Epstein and reporters, Epstein and other high-flyers, and Epstein and Democrats, he constantly hints that he holds incriminating evidence against the President but never actually says what that evidence is. So far as we can tell from tens of thousands of communications, he had nothing. Bupkis.
But Epstein used that nothing to get a whole lot of attention.
When you aim for the King, don’t miss. In Hamlet, King Claudius proclaimed, “Revenge shall have no bounds.”
Epstein is now a former pedophile. Yesterday —at last!— President Trump unexpectedly plunged the apparatus of government right into Democrats, using the same Epstein sword they’ve been sharpening since January. And what can they say? Having become a part of the dramatic political opera that they composed, Democrats cannot reasonably argue that anyone is off the table for investigations.
In short, it’s too late to say never mind.” WaPo’s editors whined, “Trump wants to redirect the Epstein furies away from himself and toward his political opponents.” Indeed.
The good money says Democrats will soon be playing defense on Epstein.
The four main charges at Nuremberg were:
Conspiracy to wage aggressive war
Crimes against peace (starting wars)
War crimes
Crimes against humanity
The murder of the Jews was prosecuted under crimes against humanity. But these charges also covered:
mass murder of Poles, Russians, Yugoslavs, Romani, and others
slave labor
mass deportations
medical experiments
general terror policies in occupied territories
So the Holocaust was just one part of a much larger set of atrocities being tried.
Twenty-four hours after House Speaker Mike Johnson announced an pending vote to “compel” the DOJ to release the Epstein files, President Trump shocked the world by demanding an investigation of people named in the Epstein disclosures, including (but not limited to) Bill Clinton, former Harvard President Larry Summers, billionaire Democrat donor Reid Hoffman, and mega-bank J.P. Morgan-Chase. ...
The Times never saw this coming. The article practically gasped with shock, angrily reminded readers about the DOJ’s unsigned July memo closing the investigation, and frantically speculated that Trump only opened these new investigations so DOJ would have an excuse not to turn over its Epstein files because of pending investigations.
Also interesting: they mentioned the story I recently read in Shirer's "Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" that Hermann Göring was named for a very rich Jewish family friend named Hermann Epstein! And the family lived for some time with that Epstein in his castle.
The Blast Radius of Jeff Epstein
By Matt Stoller
“The single most important neoliberal thinker of the last forty years - economist Larry Summers - had an extensive and deep political and personal relationship with Epstein…Summers and a bunch of powerful political elites are enmeshed in a scandal involving a network of, well, there’s no nice way to put it, globalist pedophile billionaires.”
Summers is like a particularly obnoxious Zelig character, who has promoted so many bad policy decision over the decades:
Under Clinton, Summers bonded with Alan Greenspan and Robert Rubin, the three men nicknamed the ‘Committee to Save the World’ by Time Magazine due to their ability to bail out U.S. banks involved in the Mexican and East Asian financial crises. Summers eventually worked his way up to Treasury Secretary, where he organized the deregulation of derivatives and the end of Glass-Steagall, helped broker the transformation of the Soviet Union into an oligarch dominated Russian state, and served as a key administration lobbyist for NAFTA and China’s entrance into the World Trade Organization.
After the Clinton administration, Summers became the President of Harvard University, perhaps the single most influential role in U.S. civil society, before serving as a managing director of the hedge fund D.E. Shaw for a few years. He was still heavily involved in central banking policy, influencing financial regulators to ignore speculation and fragility in the financial system. In 2005, at the Jackson Hole conference of central bankers, he famously mocked the idea that the U.S. financial system was heading for a fall, calling one prescient economist who predicted the crisis a “Luddite.” ...
At some level, I just could not fathom that these men would act the way they did. It just couldn’t really be that obvious and bad, could it? But yes, it was.
I don’t have a full answer for why we didn’t take this scandal more seriously. I think there’s a way in which we coded ourselves as “technocrats” to avoid factional disputes, instead of fully embracing the moral reform that truly animates the populist framework. After all, going up against Summers in this particular way means that Barack Obama tried to make the close affiliate of a sex trafficker the most powerful economic actor in the world. And that was really hard to suggest in Democratic circles without being pushed out as some sort of quack.
The truth is, from the Abundance movement to the pro-monopoly financial and economic group to the AI oligarchs, operates a class of human beings who feel completely insulated from any normal sense of political obligation to other Americans. Sam Bankman-Fried was a billionaire fraud and a deviant quack but he poured cash into an elite cult, Effective Altruism. EA turned into the creepy elite AI world at Anthropic, as well as Abundance, a New York Times-driven movement that is right now making a huge play to dominate politics, free from accountability from their association with him. Larry Summers is the legacy of decades of this sordid behavior. It’s not that these people are deviants, or have engaged in shameful personal behavior, or have abused power. These things happen, all the time, in every society.
It’s that these men were so cavalier that they could get away with what they were doing, because they realized no one in elite circles could even imagine they might be as gross as they actually are. They bet on our snobbery, on how we looked down on QAnon conspiracy theorists, and they were right. Hopefully, we will stop seeing our two-tiered justice system, and this insane elite world or insulated weirdos, as a conspiracy theory beneath our attention. It’s not. We are living in the world they’ve created, and it’s a world we must see clearly, so we can take it apart and restore some sense of moral order.
Understanding Epstein: Benz Theory Of The Case Fully Confirmed
A 2015 clip of Presidential Candidate Donald Trump bringing up Epstein Island before anyone knew who Epstein was is resurfacing.
“That island was a cesspool. Just ask Prince Andrew. He’ll tell you about it.”
A guilty man doesn’t mention something he wants to hide.
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) said he thought “a hundred or more” House Republicans could vote to release the Jeffrey Epstein files.
Host Jonathan Karl said, “President Trump fought long and hard to prevent your discharge petition from going through. You won that battle. Now what happens? How many Republicans in the House follow your lead and defy the president on this?”
Massie said, “I think we could have a deluge of Republicans, a hundred or more. I hope to get a veto-proof majority on this legislation when it comes up for a vote. The president’s been saying this is a hoax. He has been saying that for months. He now decided to investigate a hoax. If it’s a hoax, I have another concern about these investigations that he has announced. If they have ongoing investigations in certain areas, those documents can’t be released. So this might be a big smokescreen, these investigations, to open up a bunch of them as a last-ditch effort to prevent the release of the Epstein files.”
Karl said, “It is extraordinary to hear him demand an investigation and only mention Democrats, only mention his political opponents. But you’re saying he doesn’t really want any investigation. He wants to prevent the release. Why does he want to prevent this? What is he afraid of?”
Massie said, “You know, I have never said that these files will implicate Donald Trump. I really don’t think that they will. I think he is trying to protect a bunch of rich and powerful friends, billionaires, donors to his campaign, friends in his social circles. That’s my operating theory on why he is trying so hard to keep these files closed.”


« First « Previous Comments 1,531 - 1,570 of 1,661 Next » Last » Search these comments
@RudyGiuliani
🚨 BREAKING NEWS: The Jeffrey Epstein Client List is now delayed until at least Jan. 22 after the court grants Jane Doe 107’s request for a 30-day extension claiming a "risk of physical harm in her country."
Yikes. It may never come out. Expect more of this.https://x.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1742380130486321587?s=20
Can't be Gislaine, she's in prison. Who? I'd say Kamala, but she's in DC.