« First « Previous Comments 1,598 - 1,637 of 1,661 Next » Last » Search these comments
Lately I’ve been wondering if the hypothesis that Epstein’s primary weapon was the use of underage girls may, to some extent, be a red herring.
While underage girls were likely a part of some of his operations, I imagine a scenario in which Epstein (or his masters) also used the representation that underage girls were present at social gatherings to amplify the force of their blackmail operation. Epstein could have insinuated that underage girls were present and used it as a pretext for “letting attendees know”—months or even years later—that law enforcement had started asking questions.
Epstein could have said something to the effect of, “Don’t worry, I’ve got you covered and I’ll keep you posted.” This sort of operation may be characterized as primarily psychological in nature—a way of instilling fear, paranoia, and compliance.
Psychological terror would be further amplified once the word got out that Epstein had installed hidden video cameras in the various rooms of his various properties. At that point, the guys who attended his events would find themselves in a Catch-22. Those who were confident they had not broken any laws would want to exculpate themselves by proclaiming, “I don’t care if the files are released—I have nothing to hide.”
The trouble is that—though they may have nothing illegal to hide—the disclosure of the documents and images could nevertheless prove to be extremely embarrassing for them.
As Machiavelli pointed out in his 1513 pamphlet, The Prince (published in 1532) rulers must only present themselves to the people they rule in a formal, ceremonious way that maximizes their mystique.
Once the ruler is shown to be an ordinary mortal with ordinary vices, his mystique is lost, and the plebeians will cease to perceive him as having any real power. ...
In reviewing the personal conflict between Gaius Octavius (who later became Emperor Augustus) and Marcus Antonius (Mark Antony), historians have pointed out that Octavian had the advantage of personal discipline, while Antony was too given to sensuality to maintain his power.
In Rome it was claimed that Antony had been ruined by the “harlot queen” (meretrix regina) Cleopatra, while Octavian always stayed true to the Stoic principles he’d learned from his tutors, the philosophers Athenodorus Cananites and Arius Didymus.
IF the Epstein files are ultimately disclosed in their entirety, the upshot may be that the powerful men of disciplined habits will survive the scandal, while those given to sensuality and self-indulgence will lose their mystique and therefore their power.

Epstein Survivors Demand Files Release in Powerful PSA Aired on National TV


"We have nothing to do with Epstein; the Democrats do. All of his friends were Dems... I hate to see that deflect from the great job we've done, so I'm all for it," says @POTUS on releasing the Epstein files.
"It's really a Democrat problem. The Dems were Epstein's friends."


Senate agrees to automatically pass bill to release Epstein files as Trump claims to not care

You think it’s a good thing that a former livin GB US president is caught up in a sex with underage girls scandal?
FuckTheMainstreamMedia says
You think it’s a good thing that a former livin GB US president is caught up in a sex with underage girls scandal?
You think Donnie T gives a fuck about that?


Eric Holder says
a former livin GB US president
What does GB mean here? George Bush?

Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers has resigned from OpenAI’s board days after Congress released an extensive cache of emails with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, which included details of intimate affairs.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2025/11/18/metro/epstein-summers-wife-emails-harvard/
Harvard reported millions in
donations linked to Epstein. But it
didn't mention a major gift to Larry
Summers's wife.
I’ll interrupt the headlines with the email from Lisa New (Summers’s wife) to Jeffrey Epstein in December 2015—well after his sex-trafficking conviction. Epstein gave her a bunch of money for poetry. Behold:
Harvard did a whitewashing investigation and report on itself in 2020, absolving the school from any financial ties to Epstein. But the Boston Globe reported that the major gift from Epstein to Larry Summers’s wife, creating a “major” Harvard poetry project, wasn’t mentioned in the 2020 report at all. “The omission,” the Globe said, “raises new questions about the thoroughness of that investigation, which Harvard has repeatedly cited when asked about its connections to Epstein.”
Whoops. Another Harvard scandal.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/nov/18/new-york-times-larry-summers-epstein-email
Publication said it will not renew former treasury secretary’s contract in latest fallout after release of emails
On Tuesday, Charlie Stadtlander, the New York Times’ executive director for media relations and communications, said: “Lawrence Summers was a contributing writer for New York Times Opinion on a one-year contract beginning in January 2025. We do not intend to renew this contract. We thank him for his contributions.” ...
The files showed that Summers maintained a years-long relationship with Epstein. In a email to Epstein on 16 March 2019, Summers discussed interactions he had with a woman, writing: “I said what are you up to. She said ‘I’m busy’. I said awfully coy u are.”
Epstein, who often wrote with spelling and grammatical errors, replied: “You reacted well.. annoyed shows caring. , no whining showed strentgh.”
In the same series of exchanges, Summers also asked for advice about when to contact the woman, to which Epstein dictated a message, saying: “Just send, happy for the time we spent together- have fun see you soon.”
Note that Summers is married to the same Lisa New mentioned in the poetry scandal, above. They married in 2005. But sketchy Mr. Summers sent his “wing man” emails seeking advice about seducing (“getting horizontal with”) his menteé— in November 2018. That is, while he was married.
Needless to say, the menteé is the daughter of a high-ranking CCP official. “U r better at understanding Chinese women than at probability theory,” Summers wrote Epstein. ...
Summers is now the highest-profile American wiped out by his Epstein connections— even with no proof of crimes. Just his gross-ness. ...
Finally, a whole raft of media heavyweights is surfacing as having wined, dined, or otherwise cozied up to the world’s most notorious pedophile after his 2008 conviction. The roster reads like a press-room who’s-who: ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, CBS’s Charlie Rose, Arianna Huffington, New York Times alum Michael Wolff, and America’s morning-show sweetheart, “perky” Katie Couric. ...
Don’t expect the media to cover it; professional courtesy runs deep. But the public is finally getting an unobstructed look at a grotesque menagerie of self-anointed elites who seem to prize money, status, and access far more than ethics. Indeed, Katie Couric herself made the point in a remarkable, Cassandra-like op-ed she posted yesterday, titled, “Why MAGA Is Obsessed With Epstein − and Why the Files Are Unlikely to Dent Loyalty To Trump.”
Couric interviewed Rutgers professor and “cultural anthropologist” Alex Hinton, who is plainly alarmed. He said, “if we go back to Pizzagate in 2016, there’s this MAGA conspiracy theory that there were Democratic elitists who were demonic forces who were sex-trafficking, and lo and behold, here’s Epstein doing precisely that.”
Professor Hinton then leaned into the theological framing: “If you look at notions of Christian morality, you also go to notions of innocence being afflicted by demonic forces. And it’s an attack on we the people by those elites; it’s a violation of rights. I mean, who isn’t horrified by the idea of sex trafficking? But again, especially in Christian circles, this is a huge issue.”
Remarkably, from the other side of the political spectrum, Professor Hinton agreed with C&C’s take: “I don’t think what is happening is indicative of a larger fracturing that’s going to take place with MAGA.” He even praised Trump’s abrupt reversal on Monday — agreeing to the Discharge Petition — as a strategic masterstroke. “He’s sort of like a chess player. He’s a couple of moves ahead of wherever, whatever’s running, and so in a way we’re always behind, and he knows where we are. It’s incredible that he’s able to do this.” ...
Did Trump know that, if he opposed disclosure, Democrats would jerk their knees and automatically take the opposite side? (Like always?)
Don’t miss this: Every single Democrat just voted to release the Epstein files. It is 100% bipartisan. So they can’t blame Trump for the collateral damage, or for doing it out of revenge, or anything else.
I think their goal is to throw a few people to the media liions, and to protect many others who are probably writing very big checks right now.
Note that Bondi has opened cases on Clinton, Summers and some banker. Why now?
So that any info on them is labeled "classified" meaning these people have cover until Bondi some year from now says, case closed, nothing to see here.
Massie was quick to pick up on this, he also noted that the ONLY info that will be released is that labeled "unclassified" and he was concerned. See how that will work?
Also, just from a quick read of the emails released from/by his estate, it is clear that the sex trafficking was a small although very active part of his business. He was a world class money launder, weapons smuggler, blackmailer, seller of political favors, and above all, a top Mossad agent.
They will go to great lengths to cover up the Mossad connections and the most egregious of the sex/murders. But they have a very big problem; a great many people want those docs out, yes for the children involved, but primarily for what they reveal on Mossad.
Covering up the Mossad role will be amost impossible and THAT fact may bring down the AIPAC houseof cards. Here's hoping.






Revelation of the method is part of the method. At the end of it, they know you will understand their crimes in intricate detail, but will be powerless (and demoralized) because nothing will happen to them as a result. The perfect false flag ends with us too late knowing the false flag, but nobody gets indicted or punished because of it. You are helpless scum, they rule.
I want the classified files, which are apparently not going to be released.
What exactly could be a national security threat about a pedophile and tax evasion facilitator?
On Wednesday, President Donald Trump signed a bill directing the U.S. Department of Justice to release unclassified Jeffrey Epstein files within 30 days.

« First « Previous Comments 1,598 - 1,637 of 1,661 Next » Last » Search these comments
@RudyGiuliani
🚨 BREAKING NEWS: The Jeffrey Epstein Client List is now delayed until at least Jan. 22 after the court grants Jane Doe 107’s request for a 30-day extension claiming a "risk of physical harm in her country."
Yikes. It may never come out. Expect more of this.https://x.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1742380130486321587?s=20
Can't be Gislaine, she's in prison. Who? I'd say Kamala, but she's in DC.