patrick.net

WookieMan says

Not a judgement on you guys, kind of, but that's "hot?

She's not ugly.

Yeah, "not ugly" is technically a 5+. She's not too fat, course features, a 4.5 head, 34B-28-38. IOW, approximately a 5.

stereotomy says

Yeah, "not ugly" is technically a 5+. She's not too fat, course features, a 4.5 head, 34B-28-38. IOW, approximately a 5.

Those are high waist shorts to tuck it in. My wife is athletic and those are some fat ass thighs. She will start turning into a cow by 35-45 if she doesn't take care of herself.

Problem with women is they're taking 20-30 photos before they post one publicly. There's literally websites on how to pose for a photo to look thinner as a woman. Won't know, but I'd bet her mom is a land whale. Those are genetically beefy thighs that will only get larger and look like cottage cheese.

Also that face makes me think evil. Not joking. If I were to date that (not in the market) I'm not looking at that face every day. Sorry. I could deal with the extra cushion, but I'd need to see her mom, because that's what she's going to look like.

Chicks hitting the wall will do all sorts of things in a final spasm to attract male attention. After that, it's a variation of Hegel's (or more popularly attributed to Marx) that "history repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce." They become the continual fuck toy, always down for a lay, but never able to lock down a man they "respect." A future of a cat menagerie and a fridge full of box wine awaits these most self-entitled of the self-entitled.

The PTB are already planning for dealing with the Trump deportations!