« First « Previous Comments 72 - 91 of 91 Search these comments
I can't see any advantage to the "Amero". Why would anyone propose such a thing? Any oil we buy from Mexico or Canada is already priced in $US. The only thing worse than an old fiat currency is a new fiat currency.
Already one good chokepoint for illegal aliens from Mexico is the necessity to exchange $US for Pesos prior to shipping funds back home. If required law enforcement would have a good surveilance point. This would go away with a common North American currency.
QM looks good. But do any of the major online brokers support commodity trading?
I think E-Trade does.
Again, please be very careful because futures is a very sharp two-edged sword. Leverage works both ways.
Many people abuse leverage and they get killed. Others over-trade and they suffer. Nevertheless, oil futures has the highest correlation to oil futures prices. (Duh!)
I have lost money in the futures market.
Not investment or brokerage advice.
The Original Bankster Says:
> Another good one: Chrysler guarantees $2.99
> gas for 3 years with the purchase of an SUV.
I heard a radio ad in Sacramento yesterday where the Chrysler dealer has "Hemi" aka "Gas Sucking" pickups and cars on sale for $9K off sticker...
BTW, does anyone know if year 2000 Audi A8 is an okay (reliability-wise) car for occasion uses?
National Review has gotten their hands on an internal BofA memo from last March, which purports to be their "wish list" for a bailout.
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ODJkN2Q3NTY0MjAwYjJlNTY0NTJmMWEzZTI1OGZjZTg=
It would appear that the Dodd-Shelby bailout bill is just the BofA memo plus some cleanup.
Fiat lux - UC motto
Fiat slug - UCSC motto
Fiat currency - government motto? :?
# justme Says:
June 20th, 2008 at 11:31 am
Peter,
QM looks good. But do any of the major online brokers support commodity trading?
How different is this than trading USO options?
2.99 gas is no different from cash back. They limit how much they will chip in. I see no difference from a cash back offer.
Shitty bank (C:NYSE) and SkankAmerika (BAC:NYSE) near 52 week lows!!!
What does a GM Bailout look like??? Does anyone recall how up in arms this country was with the Chrysler bailout back in the day?
When they had GMAC they could have thrown in a 30 year fixed at 5% when you buy a hummer! Seems they lost their way.
"BTW, does anyone know if year 2000 Audi A8 is an okay (reliability-wise) car for occasion uses?"
I had an A6 - one of the two best cars I have ever had.
Coretexity,
My original concern was that ETF offerings such as USO have low float and low market cap. To me that looks like they are susceptible to manipulation, although the fund manager is supposed to make it track oil futures in some sense. So far the tracking has been pretty decent (just overlay the graphs), but can it be guaranteed on a minute-by-minute basis?
It seems more direct to uy/sell contracts (not options) of QMQ8 (august) and so on, but many brokers do not support commodity trading. Peter mentioned Etrade, I could not find anything on their web site. Ameritrade likewise.
I'm not looking for leverage, options or anything like that, just straight long/short contracts would suit me better.
Speaking of oil futures:
In light if the recent large-scale Israeli air force training exercise (read: preparation for Iran attack), I wonder if the Israeli government or its insiders are going long or short on oil futures? Two reasons, somebody in the government knows what the plans are, and they may also want to hedge against rising oil.
Would that be illegal insider trading ? ;-)
Insider trading is defined in terms of insiders to the corporation of interest, not to some outside party that may cause a change to the fortunes of said corporation. For example, if I shorted ExxonMobile prior to blowing up some of their facilities, I would merely be a criminal terrorist and not (God forbid) an inside trader.
If I did, would it be illegal insider eating?
Huh?
If you did, I would like to hear what you think about the place.
Well, it was because you are a sushi insider, and, uh, I heard about the place from you, and, uh. you know, uh, I was just trying to be funny. Oh well :-)
« First « Previous Comments 72 - 91 of 91 Search these comments
Hi Patrick,
I’ve been following your website with some interest. I am just curious about something. Will credit scoring finally be scrutinized as one of the primary causes of this problem with a host of loans now going bad? Everything from Fannie Mae to Freddie Mac to Subprime to Alt A and even Home Equity etc., was all primarily facilitated with the use of the “statistically significant†credit score, whereas such common sense practices as actually cash flowing the borrower to see if they could actually service this debt was abandoned or ignored altogether. Is anyone looking at this to bring this to light? I think people like Fair Isaac have a lot to answer for for getting all this in motion in the first place.
To me this is no different than Moody’s taking significant fees to assign AAA ratings to Subprime mortgage-backed pools of securities that were on their way to being worthless because again, cash flow underlying the ability to service those mortgages was not even considered. Clearly this was a conflict of interest at the time by Moody’s but the fox was already in the henhouse and nobody seemed to care. Now the common taxpayer (who still doesn’t understand this) will have to ultimately bail out entities like Bear Sterns, Countrywide and ultimately the Fed plus who knows how many more because proper cash flow analysis was ignored that if done properly would have never allowed these loans to get on the books in the first place.
Is anybody even looking at this as a core cause (ie, the fact that credit scoring is very much also to blame for this) or are they just looking at other stuff? It seems like someone should bring this point to the forefront and get the Fed looking at it, or Congress, or somebody for gosh sakes.
Just a thought.
Best regards and keep up the good work!
Dave Smith
#housing