« First « Previous Comments 93 - 96 of 96 Search these comments
The reason they may not have had that money during the bubble. For example, could be, that they just entered the workforce and had no significant savings yet.
Also 5% from 600K is 30K, where is in the same area houses are now closer(Grimmer) to 400K and 20% is 80K. In 5 years, those with a degree and a goal are capable of saving $80K... I personally know a few.
Hence it is not just math. It is time that worked for them and goal that they worked on.
One example; http://www.redfin.com/CA/Fremont/4726-Victoria-Ave-94538/home/1110471
Note not every house in this neighborhood is like that, varies street by street.
Is everyone was able to achieve same - of course not.
Reminds me of this
Колхозное Ñобрание. ОтчитываетÑÑ Ð³Ð»Ð°Ð²Ð½Ñ‹Ð¹ зоотехник: (All hands at a Farm. Key technician is providing status)
– ...в Ñреднем от каждой коровы мы надоили 7 тонн молока. (.. on average from each cow we got 7 tonn of milk)
Ð’Ñтает из зала бабка, Ñпрашивает: (An older woman gets up and asks:)
– Милок, что такое в Ñреднем? (Dear, what is 'on average'?)
– Ивановна, взÑÑ‚ÑŒ к примеру корову Зорьку, она дает 3 тонны, а Звездочка – 13, а в Ñреднем они дают 8. ПонÑтно? (Well, if you for example take cow 1, she gives 3 tonns, whereas cow 2 - 13, but on average they give 8. Understand?)
– Люди, так шо Ñта деетÑÑ... ЕÑли Ñекретарша предÑÐµÐ´Ð°Ñ‚ÐµÐ»Ñ Ð›ÐµÐ½ÐºÐ° даёт ему и главному инженеру, а доÑрка Машка – каждому механизатору, то в Ñреднем по колхозу и Ñ Ð±Ð»Ñдь получаюÑÑŒ?! (People, what is this... If director's secretary Lenka f* him and principle engineer, milkmaid Mashka f* each mechanic, then on average for our farm, I am a whore????)
they just entered the workforce and had no significant savings yet
Hi SBETA,
With the "real" unemployment or underemployment rate above 20%, and prices of everything (except housing) going up every year, unfortunately reality is not on the side of those who are trying to save money for a down payment. Yes, there will be exceptions (outliers), but those outliers will not prevent prices to continue falling to their "fair value", and, even lower, because, when we are talking about real estate prices or trends, we are talking about the law of large numbers:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_large_numbers
And, also, your joke is funny, but it's not true. Even though your babushka may say that she is not a whore, odds are greatly against her, so, most likely, she probably is.
Foreclosures are a matter of public record. There is no secret shadow inventory.
Shadow inventory is not just the foreclosure inventory. It also includes delinquent loans. Foreclosures represent less than 1/3 of the total shadow inventory, akin to the top of an iceberg, where the bulk of it is "under water" - pun intended.
ПоиÑÐºÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ñ ÑƒÑ‡ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ðµ мира
ВерÑии ПС доÑтупны практичеÑки на вÑех извеÑтных Ñзыках.
ÐайдётÑÑ Ð²ÑÑ‘!
Google.ru
« First « Previous Comments 93 - 96 of 96 Search these comments
"On Wednesday, Dec. 21st, 2011, HousingWire reports that CoreLogic projected shadow inventory to be 1.6 million homes throughout the entire United States. If Stern relayed the information correctly, and Fannie relayed it to him correctly, that figure looks more like it could be the shadow inventory of South Florida alone. "
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/01/michael-olenick-is-shadow-housing-inventory-vastly-larger-than-widely-believed.html?source=patrick.net#post-23586
#housing