0
0

CA homes are old and ugly and overpriced.


               
2012 May 10, 3:36am   26,639 views  56 comments

by KILLERJANE   follow (0)  

Say you buy a 500,000 home and decide you need a change and want to move somewhere new? YOU CAN'T RENT IT FOR $6,000 A MONTH. So now you put yourself in your own little old decaying 1200 square foot jail. CONGRATULATIONS, YOU LOST THE LOTTERY. leave rants below.

Comments 1 - 7 of 56       Last »     Search these comments

1   KILLERJANE   @   2012 May 10, 3:42am  

Elephants are everywhere?

2   generallyfd   @   2012 May 10, 3:58am  

I don't mind renting a home in San Jose, but there are very few I'd want to buy for the price they're asking. There's not much pride of ownership in a 50 year old shoebox.

3   KILLERJANE   @   2012 May 10, 4:01am  

And just wait till the plumbling to the street goes, that's starting about $15,000 in repair for the owner. The street plumbing is old and has been causing a lot of owners financial grief. 2 of my neighbors both got hit for it.

4   freak80   @   2012 May 10, 4:03am  

When I was in CA last year I was thinking the same thing: ugly ugly ugly and in bad condition.

I saw some nice places in Beverly Hills though...

5   KILLERJANE   @   2012 May 10, 4:05am  

He he

6   Bigsby   @   2012 May 10, 4:08am  

Why would you need to rent it for $6000?

7   KILLERJANE   @   2012 May 10, 4:15am  

Well, maybe 4800 to 5000 would pay the tab. But you still wouldn't get someone to pay that. You would need to pay PITI, HOA, REPAIRS, HIGHER TAXES FOR A NON OWNER OCCUPIED PROPERTY. Without getting enough rent to cover costs, you are stuck with the difference. That means you may be unable to afford a move.

Comments 1 - 7 of 56       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste