patrick.net

This illustrates that environmentalism is nothing more than a virtue signaling political weapon. When its time to launder money through forever projects, the environmentalism is put aside.

I think Andrew was the one who was found dead wearing a dress with a dildo stuck in his ass in a Hollywood hotel room or something to that effect. The Getty's commonly have drug problems.

Original Newsom was supposed to be in recovery from alcoholism/drugs. He sure doesn't act like it, so has he been replaced with Potemkin avatar?

Of course, the picture shows Newscum's florid hypocrisy pretending to be an Everyman when he was raised with these prep richy rich kids.

That kinna makes him the perfect post Biden Dem monkey wrench to continue the destruction of the Republic. If Trump patches up the election frauds before them, I would bet Newscum doesn't even run, unless he is bossed to by the baleful forces.

Ceffer says

AI summary: The main difference is that mural is typically a commissioned and planned artwork, while graffiti is often unauthorized, spontaneous, and focused on lettering or tags.
Now a days, they are seen in SF streets.
Some people think, getting murals is to avoid graffiti. In either case it’s risky to go around.

https://www.abc10.com/article/news/politics/prop-50-campaigns-support-opposition-top-250-million-californias-special-election/103-42b439cf-fd2d-4775-b844-b8282afe15b1#

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — With only a week left until the special election, the “Yes” and “No” campaigns on Proposition 50 are still drawing major donations. But California Governor Gavin Newsom is now asking people to stop sending money to the “Yes” side, saying the response has been a surprise.
At last check, the “Yes on 50” campaign had raised nearly $168 million this election cycle, while the “No on 50” campaign had brought in $83.5 million. There’s a large gap, and both sides say the fight is far from over.

Sounded like rigging will be intact;)

Ceffer says

CCP is making the California executive decisions.

Not dangerous, but it's annoying that the ban on gas-powered leaf blowers is also not enforced.

Atherton, Menlo Park, and Palo Alto have all had this ban for a year and a half, but the illegal gardeners just keep on using them. I see them every day. Police could stop this in one day just by driving around and writing 100 tickets, but they never do.

I think the lack of enforcement is deliberate, to protect the illegals from visibility that might attract ICE. California really doesn't want the illegals to go back to their home countries, because California would then lose Congressional seats.

https://gvwire.com/2025/10/28/ca-state-retirement-fund-lost-71-of-468m-put-in-clean-energy-wont-say-how/

RC2006 says

https://gvwire.com/2025/10/28/ca-state-retirement-fund-lost-71-of-468m-put-in-clean-energy-wont-say-how/

It was money laundering. What else?

Patrick says

Atherton, Menlo Park, and Palo Alto have all had this ban for a year and a half, but the illegal gardeners just keep on using them. I see them every day. Police could stop this in one day just by driving around and writing 100 tickets, but they never do.

Police should confiscate the leaf blowers with the option of the owner to pay a fee to get it back, give the person using the blower a $500 fine with a $500 bond to get out of jail (i.e.: you're in jail until you pay the fine), and notify ICE for a free ride home for non-citizens. And, since there are already laws on the books, a fine for the homeowner employing the worker since the worker was violating an ordinance.

Patrick says

https://x.com/ianonpatriot/status/1962506540146917735

I'm begging Newsom to announce his run for president. These sorts of videos will so much overwhelm the internet that censorship won't be able to get them all.

SunnyvaleCA says

I'm begging Newsom to announce his run for president. These sorts of videos will so much overwhelm the internet that censorship won't be able to get them all.

I can't speak for all midwesterners or swings state voters by me, but he'll lose regardless of the bad stuff he's done in CA. He's just a slimy scumbag. As far as birthplace, Nixon is the only CA POTUS. Sure Reagan lived in CA, but grew up in IL. See the attached map. The rest of the country doesn't like CA people except to visit. They're not electable. Case in point Kamala Harris.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_presidents_of_the_United_States_by_home_state



I like CA, but I generally don't like most the people. Pompous ass holes. That how East of the Mississippi generally thinks of CA from my travels. Newsom cannot win on a national stage unless the Republicans bring out an actual retard and even then they might get sympathy votes.

Dems need to pick someone East of the Mississippi in a swing state. Not sure if it's his ambition and I wouldn't vote for him, but Fetterman after the stroke recovery seems like a person that could win over OH, MI, PA in 2028. From what I watched he's at least reasonable. Not sure how he'd do in a debate though. AOC isn't liked in the East either, would suck at debating and we won't see a female POTUS in any of our lifetimes. I don't know of a notable and prominent female CEO in any industry. If you cannot get to that level, POTUS is a stretch.

Yes, it looks like Trump is squaring off at last directly with California election fraud. STAY TUNED from Trump is a baleful harbinger. I can hardly wait. and wait. and wait. I'm confused.

Ceffer says

Yes, it looks like Trump is squaring off at last directly with California election fraud. STAY TUNED from Trump is a baleful harbinger. I can hardly wait. and wait. and wait. I'm confused.

When he's referring to 'unconstitutional' he means how it violates the State's constitution, not federal.

Grok says Prop 50 is intended to alter the CA Constitution to make itself legal:

Is California's Proposition 50 Against the State Constitution?

No, Proposition 50 is not against the California Constitution. It is a legislatively referred constitutional amendment (via Assembly Constitutional Amendment 8, or ACA 8), which means it directly amends the state constitution if approved by voters on November 4, 2025. As such, passage would make it part of the constitution, overriding any conflicting provisions (e.g., those establishing the independent California Citizens Redistricting Commission from Propositions 11 and 20 in 2008–2010). The measure explicitly includes language like "notwithstanding any other provision of this Constitution," designed to suspend the commission's maps temporarily without violating the document.

However, opponents argue it undermines the "spirit" of the constitution by politicizing redistricting, and they have (and will) challenge it legally on grounds like procedural flaws or federal voting rights issues. A pre-election challenge failed, but post-passage lawsuits are expected.

Patrick says

A pre-election challenge failed, but post-passage lawsuits are expected.

Nothing will happen. One could even prove massive vote fraud with the Prop 50 election and the passage will still stand.

They have been going overboard in California to give the propaganda appearance that the election fraud is not an election fraud. Mucho lipstick on the pig.

The only good news from this is that the population is giving them kickback that they don't trust the elections. So, they have to ramp up the cosmetics of the fraud.

A young woman behind me got a printed ballot and filled it out instead of voting on the machine pad. People who vote in person on paper ballots don't trust the voting system.

So nice of them to 'include' my election results, as if its their royal option. The publication that they were using envelopes on the mail in votes that revealed the yes vote through a strategic hole in the envelope must have caught up with them.

I like that they are nervous, but I would rather see them hung.

https://rumble.com/v718qly-democrats-leading-groups-of-chinese-to-vote-prop-50.html

As we all knew, election fraud wins again.

HeadSet says

Patrick says

A pre-election challenge failed, but post-passage lawsuits are expected.

Nothing will happen. One could even prove massive vote fraud with the Prop 50 election and the passage will still stand.

I doubt any fraud was even necessary. This is the same crowd who happily voted for gas tax increases. TWICE.

Yup same people regularly getting covid shots still.

I guess we need a betting pool on how far this one has legs. Anybody want to set up odds?

The nice thing about election fraud, the sky is the limit on criminal enablement, be it money laundering all the way up to right of way eminent domain razing of cities with DEW and HAARP.

What community is next on Nero Newscum's Dresden burning agenda?

The CIA is retiring their actress, but what dread horror do they have for her 'replacement'?

Sounds about right.

https://x.com/joma_gc/status/1986506245050638501

Lesson from Tuesday:

Trump's coalition is built on "unreliable" voters -- in significant part men between 20 and 40.

Women in the same age group show up at polls and vote. That's what carried Spanberger and Sherril to much bigger than expected victories -- it's not that the Dems have more voters, they have more reliable voters in low-turnout elections.

The Calif Prop 50 election was over 4 weeks ago when the Cal. GOP -- under-resourced -- and wealthy individuals who claimed they would oppose the ballot measure all pulled back.

Harris won Calif by a margin of 58.5 to 38.3.

So the No on 50 campaign needed to have 10% of Harris voters cross-over into the No camp.

The Prop passed with 65% of the vote -- that doesn't mean the Proposition was more popular than Harris, it means reliable Dem voters showed up and opposition voters did not.

For the past 2 weeks I heard "Yes on 50" campaign ads -- on CONSERVATIVE PODCASTS -- and never heard a single "No on 50" ad. The money to oppose the measure never materialized and the CA GOP is not an effective state-wide organization at this point.

Similar results on odd off-year elections happened elsewhere.

The GOP problem is that only Trump motivates these low-propensity voters.

The GOP win in Virginia in 2021, and the very close race for NJ Gov in 2021 with the same candidate who just lost by 12%, were both referendums on the Biden Admin. first 12 months in office.

Trump voters didn't show up on Tuesday because right now Trump voters are -- for the most part -- happy with what the Admin is doing and attempting to do.

Happiness isn't a motivator when it comes to getting people to the polls.

https://x.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1986481513685524675

2 million voted less in 2024 compared to 2020 election in California

2024 election
Harris vs Trump
Popular vote 9,276,179 6,081,697
Percentage 58.47% 38.33%

2020 election
Biden vs Trump
Popular vote 11,110,639 6,006,518
Percentage 63.48% 34.32%

2016 election
Clinton vs Trump
Popular vote 8,753,792 4,483,814
Percentage 61.73% 31.62%

2012 election
Obama vs Romney
Popular vote 7,854,285 4,839,958
Percentage 60.24% 37.12%

California: 21% of its House of Representatives delegation is Republican (yet Trump won 38% of the vote)

Texas: 66% of its House of Representatives delegation is Republican (whereas Trump won 56% of the vote)

That's 'billions of dollars train to nowhere'. So, where did the money go?