0
0

California, who is voting Yes or No on prop 37?


               
2012 Oct 9, 2:09am   742 views  1 comment

by FortWayne   follow (1)  

Seems like a simple transparency issue. However, some politically right stations don't like it. Anything that is wrong with it?

All 3 points below seem reasonable to me.

- Require labeling on raw or processed food offered for sale to consumers if the food is made from plants or animals with genetic material changed in specified ways.
- Prohibit labeling or advertising such food as "natural."
- Exempt from this requirement foods that are "certified organic; unintentionally produced with genetically engineered material; made from animals fed or injected with genetically engineered material but not genetically engineered themselves; processed with or containing only small amounts of genetically engineered ingredients; administered for treatment of medical conditions; sold for immediate consumption such as in a restaurant; or alcoholic beverages."

Comments 1 - 1 of 1        Search these comments

1   Automan Empire   2012 Oct 9, 2:21am  

Monsanto is really pouring money into this. Are they afraid that the public would reject their frankenfood if they knew what they were eating?

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste