« First « Previous Comments 97 - 103 of 103 Search these comments
Yes, Obama could have let the economy crash, and that may have been a good thing, except for how fragile Europe was.
Was Europe fragile? Or was the European Union fragile?
I think that letting things crash had a high risk of leading to a depression. There was a lot of talk of this. Bernanke wrote a thesis on how loose monetary policy could have prevented the depression. Bernanke did what he could.
Obama campaigned in 2008 on the idea that taxes should remain low (Bush levels) on everybody except those making > $250,000. http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/27/news/economy/obama_wealthy_taxes/index.htm
He campaigned in 2012 on basically the same line. He won two elections on the same campaign idea in 2008 and 2012. Let's get on with it.
In 2008, I never thought that Obama would be reelected. I was sure that the stock market and economy were going to go into the crapper way more than they did & way more than would allow O to get reelected.
It makes it harder but much shorter
You've said this many times, but saying it doesn't make it so. I'm wondering how making a recession into a depression makes it shorter? How does making more people unemployed shorten the duration?
And there seems to be others who agree with you. So anyone--how does making a recession "harder" shorten the duration?
Our economy shouldn't be so dependant on growth. Growth should be a blessing.
An economy built on growth makes me very nervous. I remember a video that was floating around about the destruction of resources on the planet. It was basically saying that we have allowed corporations and advertisers to fuel a growth based economy by glorifying self-ish, hyper-consumption. This has resulted in a criminal destruction of resources on the planet. We fuel the growth and the concentration of wealth by literally destroying the things that keep us alive.
That's bullshit framing.
The problem is the corporate press has controlled the debate in this country since the 1980s.
I think greed and entitlement fueled by a corporate press are like a virus.
When I say entitlement, I don't mean benefits to the poor. I mean entitlement to have and consume more. The "Baby, I deserve it!" culture is a toxin.
He campaigned in 2012 on basically the same line. He won two elections on the same campaign idea in 2008 and 2012. Let's get on with it.
there are always a lot of "obstacles" in congress, all they do is hinder progress.
there are always a lot of "obstacles" in congress, all they do is hinder progress.
True, but I am surprised the repubs are not getting the message. They lost two elections where the economy was one of the biggest issues. The other guy won both with the same message. You would think that the repubs would see the writing on the wall, and go with the flow.
there are always a lot of "obstacles" in congress, all they do is hinder progress.
True, but I am surprised the repubs are not getting the message. They lost two elections where the economy was one of the biggest issues. The other guy won both with the same message. You would think that the repubs would see the writing on the wall, and go with the flow.
there are also a lot of lobbyists and dark forces working behind the scene.
« First « Previous Comments 97 - 103 of 103 Search these comments
http://www.thenorrisgroup.com/index.php?cID=714
If you never heard of these guys you are not a RE investor in CA. They are medium sized flippers/hard money lenders. They put $ where mouth is. You can even invest in notes through them so of course they are talking their book but all data indicates upward prices.
Im going with his prediction - which will vary wildly from inland ghetto to 'good schools' (racist codeword) areas.