by MMR follow (1)
Comments 1 - 5 of 44 Next » Last » Search these comments
Immigrants. They still have a lot of kids.
We'll need to find jobs for them, but I can't see a way to meaningfully grow the younger demographics without immigration playing a large role.
Another Chicken Little non-crisis to get some kind of funding for the non-problem?
I just don't believe it, schools swarming with illegals, no jobs for the young people that are already here. Young people are the most likely to leave the state for work opportunities.
The Lucille Packard Foundation sounds like it is staffed by airheads. Airheads who are taking it for a ride along with the usual left leaning academics. Somebody's methodologies and the conclusions they draw from it really suck.
Treasure and nurture our poor oppressed, dwindling young. BuLLshit!
A lot of the boomers won't be able to retire. I know guys who plan on going until at least 72.
Reverting back to pre WWII, when people just worked until they were too sick to continue to do so, retirement by modern standards was uncommon.
Work til you drop and devil take the hindmost.
Comments 1 - 5 of 44 Next » Last » Search these comments
California 'suffering unprecedented decline' in child population
California is in the midst of an unprecedented decline in its child population. Falling birth rates, a decrease in migration and the retirement of the 'baby boom' generation are threatening the future prosperity of America's most populous state, a new report has revealed.
By 2030, children will make up 1/5 of population, while in 1970, they made up 1/3
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9791411/California-suffering-unprecedented-decline-in-child-population.html