1
0

Schiff - The Coming Housing Collapse


 invite response                
2013 Mar 12, 12:12pm   5,998 views  15 comments

by HousingBoom   ➕follow (1)   💰tip   ignore  

http://www.forbes.com/sites/afontevecchia/2013/03/05/peter-schiff-and-the-coming-housing-collapse-the-fed-instead-of-lehman-owns-the-mortgage-market/

Peter Schiff, the eternal provocateur, suggests the Feds extraordinary support of bond and housing markets will lead to a market crash as interest rates rise, leaving banks, mortgage originators, and lenders stuck with homes and low yielding loans as the economy slows, exacerbating the decline and throwing the economy into a deeper crisis.

#housing

Comments 1 - 15 of 15        Search these comments

1   anonymous   2013 Mar 12, 2:00pm  

lol

2   mell   2013 Mar 12, 2:03pm  

Or, you could look at it this way: If you listened to Schiff and had the balls to short the housing/financial market in 2007/2008 when everybody was laughing in his face, then you would not have to be buying and renting out properties anymore for the rest of your life because you'd be up a cool 10 -100 million $$ by now, like Michael Burry and a few others.

3   mell   2013 Mar 12, 2:56pm  

There is a difference between trading/timing and economic/sector outlook. That's the reason why Schiff's fund is neither bankrupt nor ultra-rich, but his clients seem to be doing ok, if you actually take the time and check out the handful of funds he is offering on the europac website and their annualized returns (not stellar but definitely stable and above inflation for the mix throughout all funds).

4   PockyClipsNow   2013 Mar 12, 3:36pm  

I used to like hearing him talk a lot more.

5   mell   2013 Mar 13, 12:39am  

robertoaribas says

EPIVX trading at 10.70 today, started at 10 in 2010...0.3% A YEAR!

EPLAX is up 11% over 2 years... when the market in general is up what 20%?

EPASX about the same, 5% per year, when the market in general has quadrupled that.

EPIBX is flat for two years.

So what? They are still returns and way above any savings rate you can get and definitely don't prove your hyperbole of "clients losing their ass". A hedge fund's primary mission is to make its client money in good and bad times and always protect (hedge) itself from bankruptcy, so they often underperform the market during a bull run The problem with somebody just tracking the market is that all their gains get wiped out during the next crash (like in 2008), which is often not an option for seniors or generally risk-adverse people. In fact most people would be ok with a savings rate of 3-5%, but they don't get this with ZIRP so they have to gamble in the market and/or invest with hedge funds.

6   mell   2013 Mar 13, 2:21am  

You don't seem to understand much about hedge funds. Since 2000 his strategy outperformed any spider or other normal market tracking funds, so what you are saying is basically wrong. You are cherry-picking a short period following the crash and we already have established that they have been trailing there. I never said he is a stellar investor, but your claims are simply false. Sure you'd be pissed if you invested in europac right after the crash but on the long run - and that's what hedge funds are for - he is making his clients money. Why would people be keeping invested with him if that weren't so? Investing in countries with a sound money policy and stocks with good yields (plus precious metals & agriculture) makes a lot of sense for a long term strategy for a hedge fund.

7   mell   2013 Mar 13, 2:58am  

I don't invest in Schiff (as previously said) as I trade my own portfolio and he is not an end of the world guy, he just likes to invest in countries with sound currency policies. Doesn't look like a doomer to me.

8   Done   2013 Mar 13, 2:59am  

http://www.currencynewstrading.com/

Fundamental economic strength
USD 63
EUR 53
CHF 53
CAD 51
JPY 47
AUD 47
NZD 46
GBP 44

9   gsr   2013 Mar 13, 12:39pm  

AUD and NZD have both gained substantially w.r.t USD during the last few years. Anyone invested on those currencies made a lot of money. I believe Schiff was asking people to do that too.

10   yup1   2013 Mar 13, 11:59pm  

gsr says

AUD and NZD have both gained substantially w.r.t USD during the last few years. Anyone invested on those currencies made a lot of money. I believe Schiff was asking people to do that too.

AUD vs USD had made about 10% over the past 3 years
NZD vs USD has made about 15% over the past 3 years

11   Robert Sproul   2013 Mar 14, 12:39am  

Schiff is kind of a cheese-ball for sure, although his address in '06 to the Western Mortgage Bankers Ass. (where he tells them they are soon to be out of work) is classic.
They were about to throw their gaudy fake Rolexes at him.
Schiff, like many of us, failed to foresee the insane extremism of the Fed.
Who knew they would carpet bomb the global landscape with free money, or would continue the swag-fest of financial repression for years and years.

12   RentingForHalfTheCost   2013 Mar 14, 1:59am  

Robert Sproul says

Schiff, like many of us, failed to foresee the insane extremism of the Fed.

Who knew they would carpet bomb the global landscape with free money, or would continue the swag-fest of financial repression for years and years.

Dead on! We are just kicking the can down the road. Schiff will turn out to be right in the end. We are a bunch of lazy consuming monsters in the global market. Our day will come when the rest of the world will have enough of our bad habits. Now, they need us to keep their markets going, but eventually people will even sabotage their own quality of life for fairness.

13   gsr   2013 Mar 14, 2:12am  

robertoaribas says

Point missed there, skippy!

The main point he missed was the deflationary effect of the credit crunch. Mike shedlock was right about that. He also missed the money printing ability of other central banks. Other than that, he was quite accurate.

And yes, it is impossible to be wrong on everything all times. Case in point is your desert empire.

14   mell   2013 Mar 14, 2:13am  

RentingForHalfTheCost says

Now, they need us to keep their markets going, but eventually people will even sabotage their own quality of life for fairness.

Even that is not necessary for them. They can slowly wind down their holdings of US debt while buying gold and other real assets, as some have already started.

15   Done   2013 Mar 14, 2:27am  

yup1 says

AUD vs USD had made about 10% over the past 3 years

NZD vs USD has made about 15% over the past 3 years

The AUD and NZD strength can be greatly attributed to Gold strength. The carry trade being in the 2nd driver position. .10% vrs. 3% (NZD 2.5%)
http://www.fxstreet.com/fundamental/interest-rates-table/

I'm not one who relies on the whore of hope but rather price confirmation. At present gold prices are looking down not up. On the other hand much of the economic data for the USD is strong. Everything market theory is pointing to a lively RE market and price in many areas have confirmed.

Physical RE is not liquid enough for my criteria however their are many REITs index , ETFs and FUNDs that can be bought and traded that pay dividends.
http://etf.stock-encyclopedia.com/category/real-estate-etfs-reits.html

For example;
(RWR) is very near the 52wk high. For those who are of the thought buying RE is not a good investment perhaps a hedge to profit w/o going to the mortgage broker.
http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rwr

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions