Comments 1 - 2 of 5 Next » Last » Search these comments
"Universal Healthcare"
Means nothing, and nothing legislated out of such a profoundly undefinable meaningless word, could possibly be anything but an expensive insurance racket.
Remember, if Republicans are not screaming up and down, calling any idea socialized Medicine, then it's probably not going to be good for the Country and be the healthcare system, 80% of Americans would expect out of a Government provided healthcare system.
We need a multifaceted approach that would fix five major fiscal problems facing this country.
Education Costs
lack of Educated and qualified Engineers and Doctors
Healthcare Costs
Healthcare availability
Economy
We need a tax based system, that would educate the bulk of those working in a Government healthcare system. Where they go to Government funded schools, where students get accepted 100% tuition free, based on grades in school. Then required to work in Federal Medical facilities for a set amount of time.
Healthcare for American citizens would then be free, not one single Bill for any treatment for any condition covered in that health system. People wanting option things done, or cosmetic procedures, vanity tucks and the like, can get those done in the private market.
I wouldn't mind if everyone paid 10 to 20% more in taxes to finance such a system. It would mean not see a bill in that system for anything, and not one son of a bitch was profiting from it. Other than being a worker in the system.
lack of Educated and qualified Engineers and Doctors
We already have too many engineers. This has been the case for decades already.
Comments 1 - 2 of 5 Next » Last » Search these comments
What are our main choices for distributing healthcare, and which are the best?
Who employs that method and why is it better?