« First « Previous Comments 39 - 60 of 60 Search these comments
for those of you that don't believe how good folks are living on govt benefits, keep working even harder with your head in the sand too busy slaving away to notice that those on the dole have it better than most working people. How do you think maury povich fills his audience seats every day with hooters and hollers. oh, i forgot, your too busy working to watch daytime tv.
Your gig in tech today was yesterday's job in the John Deere foundry; just a good-paying blue collar job...baby blue, but blue nevertheless.
100% Agreed!
Just 10 to 15 years ago, the wages I make now would have been enough to consider my self upper upper middle class. I could have considered Waterfront property near the beach.
To day it's just barely enough to keep afloat with a Ranchero Brubdale house, with lower middle class wants and needs.
Today my wife(who has never worked a day in the 20 years we've been married) would have to get a job and make what I make. For us to realize the same finances, that just my income alone would have made 10 years ago.
I'm making almost double now, but it seemed we had more disposable income when I only made 60K year, that was just before the bubble kicked in last decade.
To day it's just barely enough to keep afloat with a Ranchero Brubdale house, with lower middle class wants and needs.
What part of California are you in? You'd be sitting pretty with your salary out this way whereabouts I am.
PPACA exchange subsidies will reduce my health insurance premiums to $80/mo, 1/4 what they are now.
So health is taken care of.
You're going to make a Damn fine Republican, I guaran-fuckin'-TEE!
What part of California are you in? You'd be sitting pretty with your salary out this way whereabouts I am.
Florida, but I forgot to include, I have two daughters 18 and 17 who have it in mind, that my income is their income.
What part of California are you in? You'd be sitting pretty with your salary out this way whereabouts I am.
Florida, but I forgot to include, I have two daughters 18 and 17 who have it in mind, that my income is their income.
Might be time to wean them off.
Might be time to wean them off.
I have, but their Liberal education, expects me to support their every whim from that nice outfit at Wet Seal, to Monday through Sunday hang out money, lest they call me Captain Meany Pants.
Get this, one even has a Job. But that's her money to piss away in the same night of payday.
I have, but their Liberal education, expects me to support their every whim from that nice outfit at Wet Seal, to Monday through Sunday hang out money, lest they call me Captain Meany Pants.
So? Their "liberal education" is trumped by your "conservative purse strings". Wet Seal be damned, TJ Maxx, Ross, and yes even Goodwill have some plenty fine clothes. If they don't like it tell them fine, you'll buy the clothes yourself.
I'm sure they'll love what you pick out for them.
Given what people here call you I'm sure you can tolerate "Captain Meanie Pants"
This is main problem with anchor babies. It creates risks of a cycle of dependency.
http://news.yahoo.com/nations-breadbasket-latinos-stuck-poverty-120309988.html
It creates risks of a cycle of dependency.
anyone serious on the cycle of dependency would work towards freeing the renting masses from their indentured servitude to landlords.
And we can't do this via Section 8, that's just rent supports.
We need to construct millions of quality homes in thousands of communities, to break the scarcity of livable neighborhoods and thus drive housing rents down to the actual cost of the capital -- sticks and concrete -- instead of the massive economic rents -- a trillion or so -- housing is pulling from the paycheck economy now.
A $200,000 capital investment can create a pretty damn fine housing unit, and 100 of those together is a good-sized multifamily complex.
That's a $20M capital investment. The Fed is buying $85B/month in bonds, we'd be better off if the Fed deployed that e-capital such that we could build 400,000 new mfh units a month!
That would push construction employment to the max:
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/USCONS
easily adding 5M+ jobs to the paycheck economy.
5M new housing units a year would mean a community the size of Fresno would receive 8,000 new apartment/condo units in a single year -- and that level of construction would be all across the nation!
That would crush housing rents everywhere, allowing the paycheck economy to use that money towards other wants and needs beside housing, and push landlords to find more useful investments for their capital.
anyone serious on the cycle of dependency would work towards freeing the renting masses from their indentured servitude to landlords.
if you dont like where your at.. move! Rent too expensive in SFBA.. move to Fresno.
That's a $20M capital investment. The Fed is buying $85B/month in bonds, we'd be better off if the Fed deployed that e-capital such that we could build 400,000 new mfh units a month!
See the great public housing programs that went belly up decades ago. What went wrong ?
Get this, one even has a Job. But that's her money to piss away in the same night of payday.
I don't get it...what's the problem, here?
Sounds like the all-American spirit.
This is main problem with anchor babies. It creates risks of a cycle of dependency.
http://news.yahoo.com/nations-breadbasket-latinos-stuck-poverty-120309988.html
On balance, does mom's vegetable picking and resultant low food prices balance out the costs of schooling and medical care for her seven kids and herself?
This is main problem with anchor babies. It creates risks of a cycle of dependency.
http://news.yahoo.com/nations-breadbasket-latinos-stuck-poverty-120309988.html
On balance, does mom's vegetable picking and resultant low food prices balance out the costs of schooling and medical care for her seven kids and herself?
Women who care about their children's future, use birth control, and so do their sons.
It's because people in "poverty" in the US have a pretty high standard of living by world standards.
On balance, does mom's vegetable picking and resultant low food prices balance out the costs of schooling and medical care for her seven kids and herself?
No.
$20,000 a year is poverty level income.
That's the problem! We need to redefine "poverty" to much lower levels to match what they are in other parts of the world.
It's because people in "poverty" in the US have a pretty high standard of living by world standards.
They really don't. I was in Havana last month, and believe it or not, it's far less terrifying to be marginalized in that country. I'm not saying it's good, but it's worse here in many ways.
I was in Havana, Santa Clar and Cienfuegos. I'd been meaning to get back there since I was a young man. I've just always had a soft spot for Cuba, and more specifically, Cuban people -- honestly, the best people I've ever encountered anywhere on the planet, and Jody's logged some miles.
Wanted to get a jump on things before it opens up and there's a Starbucks on every corner!
Wanted to get a jump on things before it opens up and there's a Starbucks on every corner!
what would life be today with out those US financed Havana Casino's and Hotels from the 1930s and 40s.
what would life be today with out those US financed Havana Casino's and Hotels from the 1930s and 40s.
I'm not sure what you're getting at here, Tom, but to answer your question in my own estimation: better.
« First « Previous Comments 39 - 60 of 60 Search these comments
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10268