patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,364,674 comments by 15,735 users - Patrick, stereotomy online now
Comments 1 - 1 of 86 Next » Last » Search these comments
New Renter
@
2013 Jun 14, 6:25am
Um, you DO know this study was thoroughly discredited last year don't you?
On October 19, 2012, six French national academies of science issued a joint statement - "an extremely rare event in French science"[47] - condemning the study and the journal that published it.[48] "In withering terms, it dismissed the study as 'a scientific non-event'"[47]
The European Federation of Biotechnology, which counts Monsanto and other GM firms among its members,[49] called for the paper to be retracted, calling its publication a "dangerous failure of the peer-review system."[50]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seralini_affair
http://www.nature.com/news/hyped-gm-maize-study-faces-growing-scrutiny-1.11566
Comments 1 - 1 of 86 Next » Last » Search these comments
http://www.carighttoknow.org/new_study
Scientific Paper at http://research.sustainablefoodtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Final-Paper.pdf
Evidently, this is what GMO corn does to you...
I was skeptical of the health hysteria surrounding GMOs, but one must either refute or accept a scientific, peer-review study regardless of whether or not its conclusions are what you believed true. This is the first, solid scientific evidence that at least some GMOs are really bad to eat.
Addendum: This study has been discredited. (See initial replies to this thread for details.) This thread now welcomes evidence for and against the hypothesis that GMO foods cause health problems.