Comments 1 - 1 of 1 Search these comments
Good read.
"VC has ceased to be the funder of the future, and instead become a funder of features, widgets, irrelevances"
yup, less risky to fund 50 dudes in an industrial park than ~500 doing a real trial engineering roll-out.
plus all the non low-hanging fruit has to compete with some very well-entrenched interests.
You want to go toe-to-toe with PG&E, Chevron, Mobil?
Good luck with that!
Anything that has to use a lot of land is also a non-starter. Just look at how much push-back the HSR is getting.
Going to the moon had the signal advantage of not competing with existing business models, to a great extent it was a decent jobs program for the post-Sputnik national defense state.
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?g=kM0
is a pretty stunning chart, really, defense expense / wages.
We needed a 20% income tax just to pay for the DOD in the 1960s!
(LBJ's request to slap an extra 10% income tax on everyone in 1967 pissed a lot people off, of course.)
Comments 1 - 1 of 1 Search these comments
http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/429690/why-we-cant-solve-big-problems/