patrick.net

EBGuy says

Whatsapp just puts it all in one place???

This reminds me of Steve Jobs putting all in one place. They call it the iPhone.

tr6 says

How will ATT and Verizon respond? Texting will be free for all plans, and the plans will go down in price.

Well, the market has spoken. Both of these stocks are sitting near 52 week low while the market is at 52 week high. Their forward P/E don't look good either.

curious2 says

Can someone please explain, really, why is WhatsApp better than e-mail?

Thank you to those who tried to answer, and if I may offer a possible answer to my own question, the benefit may reside in verification. E-mail is vulnerable to spoofing and spam, and even FB accounts can be faked or hacked. (In one famous example, a certain foreign country created a fake FB account in the name of a NATO general, and got a lot of information about NATO from other NATO personnel who "friended" the account.) If WhatsApp verifies that the message originated with the sender's phone, that would add value.

Also WhatsApp is reportedly about to add voice, so it may compete with Skype.

Otherwise I don't see much advantage regarding fees because you still need data access, in which case e-mail would likely work as well or better.

curious2 said: Otherwise I don't see much advantage regarding fees because you still need data access, in which case e-mail would likely work as well or better.
As an old guy coming from a desktop paradigm of communications, I tend to agree with you.
On the other hand, you have a culture of two decades of "texting" over cellphones. The going rate of overseas SMS messages is 25 cents. You can see why WhatsApp became instantly popular as the economics are overwhelming. They could grow rapidly once they achieved a critical mass. After four 'international' messages, WhatsApp has paid for its yearly fee. Again, this was indispensable to my friend overseas, while most of us Americans are left scratching our heads. At any rate, I am in no way justifying what FB paid, just pointing out the what and why of the WhatsApp user base. Note also that WhatsApp was not (and still isn't) ad supported.
WhatsApp doesn’t collect information like name, gender, address or age. Instead, users are approved after their phone numbers are authenticated.
“It’s a decidedly contrarian approach shaped by Jan’s experience growing up in a communist country with a secret police,” said Goetz in a blog post yesterday on Sequoia’s website. “Jan’s childhood made him appreciate communication that was not bugged or taped.”
Will be interesting to see what FB does with these new users.

jojo says

FB is a ponzi. It will collapse soon enough. They don't even allow auditors to verify 'likes' are not fraudulent.

I agree with this except for that they will make some money from the mostly older (and wealthier) demographic now perusing FB, and except for that they can keep this hype scheme going longer than a lot of shorts can stay solvent ;) They will be around for quite a while and eventually go the route of MySpace.

google facebook fraud on you tube

jojo says

smaulgld says

google facebook fraud on you tube

Yeah, I saw that video and it really is crazy marketing companies wouldn't have a problem with all this. Companies are spending a fortune and they can't even audit the results!

I just started a facebook page and tested it myself for $15- it is a complete waste- I wrote to Facebook and told them The few likes I got were from people that had liked thousands of pages none remotely close to economics and real estate.
https://www.facebook.com/smaulgld

jojo says

What a joke. Fraudster company!

Since the page was new and all the other likes I got were from people I knew it was obvious who the bought likes were. I could also tell that even though they said one of my blog posts received something around 3000 views. I didn't register one click from Facebook according to my google analytics.
Why would a company even bother with facebook? I only did it because I had seen the video about how bad it really is.

How long can they pull this off?

Goran_K says

SFace says

The way I see it, FB can be a 40% operating margin business. If you slap a 40-50% growth for the next three years, we're talking about a 15B dollar busines with operating profits of $6B or $4B net of tax.

lol hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

well, here it is about a year later

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/facebook-reports-second-quarter-2014-200500433.html

46% operating margin and on track for 6B+ in pre-tax income. growth is 60%. I though it would take 3 years, but looks like FB will make 6B in 2014 not 2016

OP: obvious ad is obvious.

clearly patnet is on the list of targets for forum spam.

tr6 says

E-man says

SFace,

Just sold all of my FB shares. Cleared almost $12,500 in profit. Thank you very much.

Wow, you probably timed the top. Only time will tell.

Apparently not. FB made new high. They broke out of the $72 range. I was waiting for it to form a handle and buy it back at around $64-$65 range. Nope, it just broke out without forming a handle. I see this stock going to $90 within the next 12 months.

you should buy Facebook shitstock, spying on Americans is very profitable.

Hysteresis says

buy high, sell low is always a great investing strategy!

Uh huh, uh huh, uh huh!!!

tr6 says

E-man says

SFace,

Just sold all of my FB shares. Cleared almost $12,500 in profit. Thank you very much.

Wow, you probably timed the top. Only time will tell.

Apparently not. :(

E-man says

Apparently not. :(

FB profit margins are ridiculous, but sales are still very low. 3B a quarter is only 12B a year for a market cap of 200B. I have not used FB in a while, glad to get off it.

tr6 says

E-man says

Apparently not. :(

FB profit margins are ridiculous, but sales are still very low. 3B a quarter is only 12B a year for a market cap of 200B. I have not used FB in a while, glad to get off it.

I got you beat. I have never used FB and don't even have an account with them.