« First « Previous Comments 87 - 88 of 88 Search these comments
Only on the extreme end are they predicting doom, and those are the ones who say we are past the point of no return. But the consensus among over 90% in the science community is that it's a real threat and it is the result of greenhouse gases.
Many will not panic about it, including myself. But this is more of a flaw in human nature than anything else.
One could get more general about this and argue simply that we as a species and as a planet need to be more unified, for the eventuality of being able to tackle such problems as global warming or a meteor headed for collision.
In my opinion, threats of terrorism, pollution (and other environmental concerns such as overfishing) and violent rogue leaders, are all reasons why we would be well off to have a world government in the not too distant future. Something like the united nations, but an association with more power that is more effective than the UN is.
Nice cartoon. Without naming names, this is about the intelligence level of some of patnet's active right wing commentators.
« First « Previous Comments 87 - 88 of 88 Search these comments
There is not a consensus, but if it is related, some theories are explored here.
http://www.weather.com/news/science/environment/arctic-blast-linked-global-warming-20140106
#environment