Comments 1 - 16 of 58 Next » Last » Search these comments
That's just fucking great (um, maybe non-fucking great as the case may be).
https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/LFWA24TTJPQ647N
is pretty stunning, actually.
But there's still a lot of underemployment in Japan so I don't see the depopulation problem, really.
Real estate is still sky-high in Tokyo, where all the jobs are.
Japan doesn't have half the elderly support problem we do. Their "ranks of aged" are mostly (90%?) arrived by now, while we're going to rise from 50M medicare beneficiaries to 80M+ by 2030.
shows the yellow (old people) in this graph isn't going to increase much in absolute terms going forward.
But economically, the fall-off of young does introduce immense deflation. Less demand for teachers, clothing, furniture, cars, etc. It's really quite something; for Japan Inc to survive it must convert this lost domestic demand into exports somehow.
As for their crippling debt, it's also the baby boom's savings. They gave themselves tax cuts and called it savings, 1997-now. Not sure how they're going to square that circle . . .
I'm 80% sure I'm moving back to Japan this decade, so this interests me, LOL.
U.S., which have demonstrated successfully that welcoming people from a variety of nations, who may think differently and have different cultures
That's not exactly true. It's many ppl but assimilated under one culture.
That's the model which has worked because as you said, ppl think differently and bring in new ideas, whether it's in commerce or in education.
Japan doesn't have half the elderly support problem we do. Their "ranks of aged" are mostly (90%?) arrived by now,
As for their crippling debt, it's also the baby boom's savings. They gave themselves tax cuts and called it savings,
There are 2 things I would say about their 'elderly support':
- Inversely the boomers savings are invested in their debts. Pensions holding gov bonds. Which means when they default (through printing or otherwise) these savings will look like smaller, maybe a lot smaller.
- You can also look at it this way: saved money is a claim against the production of the working population: since it is money competing with wages for the produced resources. This implies that whatever happens to the debt and currency, they will in fact be a lot poorer in retirements, and the younger generations will also be a lot poorer as they will be taxed through the nose to support the huge debt and indirectly pay the elderly.
I'm 80% sure I'm moving back to Japan this decade, so this interests me
Personally I would avoid that at all cost. Lots of work, low entertainment, overcrowding (still), general lack of economic opportunities, possible war, radioactive leaks, etc...
Lets take in all the talent and brains from all over the world. I dont care who pays into the retirement system.
Lots of work, low entertainment, overcrowding (still), general lack of economic opportunities, possible war, radioactive leaks
There's a lot of nature available from Tokyo, even more if I were to locate myself more in the interior (or should I say periphery, the most interior point of Honshu is only 90 minutes from the coast).
Satellite internet and good waterfalls to hike to is all I need for entertainment, LOL.
Tokyo is quite "overcrowded", but the periphery is beginning to empty out now, and this will accelerate. Might even be possible to pick up livable real estate for free, that's what a pal did in the 1990s, up in the mountains.
Japan is still the #3 economy and is by far the richest nation on the planet, approaching $3T in NIIP:
There's not going to be a war with China. There might be some hurt feelings, but Japan will get over it.
The situation at Fukushima-I totally sucks, but the leaking will only affect the littoral aquaculture of NE Japan, and I wasn't a big fan of that alleged cuisine to begin with.
The coming 2020 Olympics bring in an interesting new change dynamic. A little shot in the arm for internationalism in Japan, something they could always use.
For sure demographics have a lot to do with it. But the real problem is Abenomics and not allowing the market to clear.
the real problem is Abenomics and not allowing the market to clear.
By "allowing the market to clear", you mean "defaulting on the debt?
That means defaulting on a bunch of pensions: People who will not have an opportunity to make it back.
That means defaulting on a bunch of pensions: People who will not have an opportunity to make it back
Yes, refer to Argentina. Someone posted a thread here the other day about 85% of pension funds will fail in the US.
You can also look at it this way: saved money is a claim against the production of the working population: since it is money competing with wages for the produced resources.
Of course, their boomer savings are basically deferred taxation since it's all (~80%) held in JGBs.
Quite a trap they've laid for themselves.
They deleveraged privately and put the load on government instead.
shows they were at peak debt in the late 1990s.
Quite frankly, taxes have to double there probably, tax-to-GDP take is pretty low, almost as low as us, and half that of the eurosocialists running tighter fiscal ships, like Denmark.
the younger generations will also be a lot poorer as they will be taxed through the nose to support the huge debt and indirectly pay the elderly
thing is, every penny the young pay to the seniors will come back to them. The only way pensions are wealth-destroying is if Japan has to import goods to meet them. This is not the case.
Same story for the US to some extent. If our boomers all buy RVs and cruise America burning diesel 24/7, we'll be totally f-ed, but otherwise the trillions going out to them will be redistributionary to a great extent -- more health jobs, more restaurant jobs, more tourist sector jobs.
But mostly more health jobs I'd guess.
Japan's declining population does mean increased food security, the opposite story of what we're facing this century, where our population in 2050 will be 30% higher than now (Japan's will be down ~25%).
I'd guess no need for new infrastructural investment for growth reasons. This is deflationary, killing these jobs, but this century I think we need to move past the quasi-Keysenian concern of jobs for jobs sake, all that pump-priming crap, and just focus on the long term picture and what it takes to get there from here.
We need to see where we want to be in 2050 and plan what needs to be done by 2040, 2030, and 2020. Capitalism is total crap at this long-term planning.
As is democratic government, since the current election cycle is more critical than what's going to happen in 2050.
thing is, every penny the young pay to the seniors will come back to them.
I don't quite agree with that. Yes, you can see it as end demand, and this may mean jobs. But at the end of the day a good chunk of what is produced will go to older folks, which mean the working population will keep a lesser amount than what their parents did.
And the crazy thing is if Japan raises taxes a lot, their sky-high real estate valuations will crash again.
Land in Japan is still hella expensive. Rural parcels with minimal services that get subdivided sell at $1M/acre, since the buildable lot size is so small (100 m2 is common) and nobody bats an eye at paying $50,000 for a lot, since it's only $80/mo in interest burden, thanks to ZIRP.
the real problem is Abenomics
Abenomics is certainly a risky path. The entire debt markets can implode suddenly and with little warning.
But at the end of the day a good chunk of what is produced will go to older folks
production is not a zero-sum game when people are underemployed.
What Japan needs is people getting paid doing productive work. Japan has to limit production of rice since they're in oversupply of that.
http://oryza.com/news/rice-news/japan-my2014-15-rice-production-forecast-decline-766-million-tons
They could make millions more cars than they are.
And what do Japanese seniors consume, anyway? Rice, fish, vegetables, water, air, TV reception.
And health care.
Comments 1 - 16 of 58 Next » Last » Search these comments
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-04-15/japan-s-population-shrinks-for-third-year-as-ranks-of-aged-grow.html
The recommended solution: "We have argued for some time that Japan has a lot to learn from Australia and the U.S., which have demonstrated successfully that welcoming people from a variety of nations, who may think differently and have different cultures but are highly talented, strengthens the economy on both the demand and supply sides,†Mizuho Securities Co.’s Chief Market Economist Yasunari Ueno wrote in a report on April 9."
I.E.: New entrants to keep the ponzi going.