1
0

Our Huge Hassle With Airport Security


               
2014 Sep 9, 11:19pm   16,135 views  46 comments

by ohomen171   follow (2)  

Yesterday I found myself in a giant bureaucratic hassle at the San Francisco International Airport.
A couple of weeks ago Elena signed up for the CLEAR program and paid a $179.00 annual fee.Their logo promises:"Speed through airport security in less than 5 minutes any time that you fly." Elena was electronically finger printed and had a retina scan taken.
Most likely her fingerprints, names, and other details were checked against all the "no fly" lists, intelligence data bases, National Crime Information Center and Interpol (for criminal records and outstanding warrants), the IRS data base, child support enforcement, etc.
(By the way I served in the US Navy. I had a secret security clearance and was considered for a top-secret clearance when I was offered a job at the US Navy section in the White House in 1972. What Elena went through was just what anyone goes through to get a secret security clearance.)
Elena passed this rigorous background check and was given an impressive-looking CLEAR card. We assumed that she would go to the airport and fly through security rapidly without the necessity to take off her shoes, pull out her laptop and be subject to an x-ray body search with its radiation exposure.
Many of us have learned in life that what the book says is supposed to happen and what happens in real life are two different things. When Elena arrived at SFO to begin the journey to New Orleans, she went right to the front of the CLEAR line. She expected a quick walk through security.Instead an employee of CLEAR escorted her to the normal security line where she was forced to take off her shoes, pull out her laptop computer and go through the dreaded x-ray body search with its radiation. We both were mad as hell. We were sure that some large error had happened.
Likewise when we were getting ready to board the plane to return from New Orleans, Elena was subject to the same indignity. We were even madder.
Yesterday I went to the CLEAR booth in the international terminal at SFO. A very bright and charming young woman named Ann looked at Elena's card, the boarding passes,etc. She carefully explained to me that the CLEAR card gets one rapidly through the line. The Transportation Safety Administration determines who gets TSA pre-screened so that they do not have to go through indignities like taking off shoes, pulling out laptops, and being subject to invasive and radiation-filled body searches. Ann told me that I had to go to a special Transportation Safety Administration office that handled TSA Pre-screened.
I spent one hour walking around two levels of the SFO international terminal and talking to several people before I found a tiny office sandwiched in between Starbuck's and BART. A lady on duty told me that Elena would have to come to that office during normal working hours (9:00 AM-5:00 PM Monday through Friday to have her finger prints taken to get accepted into the TSA pre-screened program.
The people at CLEAR never told us this. It sounds to me like there is a big bureaucratic battle going on between the people at the CLEAR program and the TSA. The TSA people fear that the CLEAR program will put them out of business.
I explained all of this to Elena. She agreed to go to the TSA and be finger printed. She wondered why it was necessary to pay a fee to get the CLEAR card. I think that the CLEAR card started with the noble intention of speeding very trust-worthy travelers through the security process. The Transportation Safety Administration felt threatened and decided to put obstacles in the path of the CLEAR program.

#crime

Comments 1 - 9 of 46       Last »     Search these comments

1   Y   @   2014 Sep 9, 11:34pm  

Sounds like Clear did what they said they would. Get you to the front.
Maybe you misunderstood what service they were providing...

https://www.clearme.com/
WHAT IS CLEAR?
CLEAR is the fastest and most predictable way to get through airport security. Being a CLEAR member means you can breeze right past the long lines and go straight to screening.

2   MAGA   @   2014 Sep 10, 12:45am  

I was going through STL airport security this past Monday. They freak out when the metal detectors go off on me. I have lots of metal implants below my waist.

3   Tenpoundbass   @   2014 Sep 10, 1:54am  

Well thank God and let's all just be thankful, that some Dark skinned middle Easterner wasn't a victim of Racial profiling. You and Elena did humanity a great service you should be proud. You were part of the great American bureaucratic Dog and Pony show, the worlds most expensive effort to seem like the Government is doing Dickall, as good decent folk your selves are sodomized by the screening process.

"No Radical Islam extremists were harmed in making this Video"

4   Ceffer   @   2014 Sep 10, 3:28am  

I want a CLEAR card made of C4 with a remote fuse.

5   Dan8267   @   2014 Sep 10, 3:33am  

ohomen171 says

go through the dreaded x-ray body search with its radiation. We both were mad as hell. We were sure that some large error had happened.

Likewise when we were getting ready to board the plane to return from New Orleans, Elena was subject to the same indignity.

So you are complaining that you can't by privilege? The very idea of CLEAR, which we all knew was the plan from the start of 9/12/2001, is Unconstitutional.

The average person has to endure sexual assault and humiliation, but the rich and connected can buy their way out of this. This is the very definition of inequality under law and privilege classes of citizens.

You should be complaining that anyone has to endure rape-scanners, not that you couldn't buy your way into a privilege class.

Airport security is theater. It does NOTHING to make us safer. Any terrorist could easily kill multitudes of people while standing in the crowded lines for security. How do you solve that problem? Have pre-security security lines? Then how do you protect the people in those lines?

I make it a point to never fly unless I absolutely have to. It's despicable that we even let our government commit these human rights violations. It's also despicable that the privilege few get any protection from so-called essential security measures while the rest of us are treated like meat and sex toys.

6   Dan8267   @   2014 Sep 10, 3:36am  

ohomen171 says

I think that the CLEAR card started with the noble intention of speeding very trust-worthy travelers through the security process.

No. It started because the dehumanization done by the TSA is supposed to only be inflicted upon the poor and the middle class, not the political elite or the rich. Most rich bypass commercial air travel all together since they can afford private air travel. But some of the lesser rich, who can afford to buy politicians, still have to fly commercial sometimes. CLEAR was intended for them, politicians, and their families, not "trustworthy" middle class people.

7   Strategist   @   2014 Sep 10, 5:06am  

Dan8267 says

ohomen171 says

I think that the CLEAR card started with the noble intention of speeding very trust-worthy travelers through the security process.

No. It started because the dehumanization done by the TSA is supposed to only be inflicted upon the poor and the middle class, not the political elite or the rich. Most rich bypass commercial air travel all together since they can afford private air travel. But some of the lesser rich, who can afford to buy politicians, still have to fly commercial sometimes. CLEAR was intended for them, politicians, and their families, not "trustworthy" middle class people.

If there was one plane with no security, and another plane with ultra tight security, and I had to pick which plane my children were gonna board, do you think I would choose the first plane?
Sorry Dan, your constitutional rights are not important enough for me to sacrifice the safety of my family. In other words......kiss my ass. :) :)

8   Dan8267   @   2014 Sep 10, 5:19am  

Strategist says

Sorry Dan, your constitutional rights are not important enough for me to sacrifice the safety of my family. In other words......kiss my ass. :) :)

Violations of Constitutional, civil, and human rights do not make your family safer. In fact, them make them less safe.

It would be trivial for terrorists to blow up a plane today. Because of corporate greed, commercial flights don't just carry passengers, they carry air mail. That's why the airlines want you carry as little luggage as possible. It leaves more cargo space for air mail and more profit.

Air mail is not scrutinized like the genitalia of your children when you go through TSA checkpoints. A terrorist could place a bomb in an air package, and rig the detonator to a smartphone. When the GPS on the smartphone reads an altitude passed some threashold, an app on the smartphone sends a signal (can be wired like USB instead of wireless) to the detonator and boom. Your family is dead.

Similarly, port cargo is not checked. The Republicans blocked all measures to require securing America's seaports because it would decrease corporate profits. I guess if Mexicans crossed on cargo ships, conservatives would demand such checks, but since it's only the threat of loose nukes in shipping containers, well that's not worth it.

One loose nuke on a cargo ship and an entire American city can be taken out. Yet, there is no real security in our sea ports today.

Violating human rights does not make your family safer. You want safety, then violate corporate profit margins. That actually would make your family safer.

As for you specific example, a terrorist just can easily blow up your family while they are standing in that security line. It would send a chilling message to America that it is impossible for their government to protect them no matter much the government abuses our rights and human dignity.

So, you see, it will be impossible for me to kiss your ass as I won't be able to find a piece larger than a pebble after an ISIS terrorist blows your family to bits because you were foolish enough to stand in a crowded line that was a perfect target for a terrorist attack.

9   Dan8267   @   2014 Sep 10, 5:23am  

Oh, and one more thing. A member of your family is far more likely to die from an overzealous security officer than from a terrorist. People have died from security theater. They have also been literally raped. And shit like that happened before 9/11 as well.

Comments 1 - 9 of 46       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste