patrick.net

Bigsby says

That has nothing to do with your claim that Obama created Daesh.

Like I said it is implied.

Bigsby says

Back up what claim? You're the only person I've ever heard claim that Obama created Daesh. Do you want me to link to every informed article on the internet to show that you are wrong in that assertion? As you said before about using Google, just type IS/ISIL/Daesh into your browser and you'll get a better understanding of the facts than you seem to have got from imprinting your own biases on the statements of a radio host who doesn't even agree with your stated view.

There you go no expert...

The US needs an enemy, it created Bin Ladin through the CIA, of course this stuff is not main stream as they don't want it to be. The US has provoked every war it has engaged in for 100 years.

Are you really that ignorant?

indigenous says

Like I said it is implied.

And like I said, no it isn't.

indigenous says

There you go no expert...

The US needs an enemy, it created Bin Ladin through the CIA, of course this stuff is not main stream as they don't want it to be. The US has provoked every war it has engaged in for 100 years.

Are you really that ignorant?

Eh? Obama didn't create Daesh. End of discussion. You can go off on any number of tangents you want in an effort to distract, but your claim was, is and will always be complete bullshit.

Bigsby says

Eh? Obama didn't create Daesh. End of discussion. You can go off on any number of tangents you want in an effort to distract, but your claim was, is and will always be complete bullshit.

Agree to disagree and fuck off

Sure he did. Run away...

I don't have time for this shit.

sbh says

Strategist says

Here is something sensible.


...........any known terrorist

At this point it's clear you don't even care how stupid your logic is. You don't try to explain anymore

If I did you would not understand anyway.

indigenous says

Sure he did. Run away...

I don't have time for this shit.

Run away from what? Your idiocy? Good idea.

HydroCabron says

- "Zero Dark Thirty", "24" and "Dirty Harry" are the basis of conservative theories on torture. "Zero Dark Thirty" is cited by conservative "researchers" as the primary evidence for the effectiveness of torture in catching *Obama*.

Was this deliberate?

I have no sympathy for the terrorists as their are not your conventional soldiers but at the same time I hope that whoever ended up in guantanamo actually deserved to be there vs being fucked over 1937 soviet style when neighbors/haters would make shit up to get their enemies liquidated.

While torture is not intrinsically immoral, I question its economics.

Genghis Khan, the greatest man ever walked on earth (or on horseback, whatever), reportedly did not use torture in his conquest.

Anyone watched Netflix's Marco Polo yet?

I keep hearing about this Marco Polo guy from kids at the pool.

And of course I am a fan of Kublai Khan.