patrick.net

Sure he did. Run away...

I don't have time for this shit.

sbh says

Strategist says

Here is something sensible.


...........any known terrorist

At this point it's clear you don't even care how stupid your logic is. You don't try to explain anymore

If I did you would not understand anyway.

indigenous says

Sure he did. Run away...

I don't have time for this shit.

Run away from what? Your idiocy? Good idea.

HydroCabron says

- "Zero Dark Thirty", "24" and "Dirty Harry" are the basis of conservative theories on torture. "Zero Dark Thirty" is cited by conservative "researchers" as the primary evidence for the effectiveness of torture in catching *Obama*.

Was this deliberate?

I have no sympathy for the terrorists as their are not your conventional soldiers but at the same time I hope that whoever ended up in guantanamo actually deserved to be there vs being fucked over 1937 soviet style when neighbors/haters would make shit up to get their enemies liquidated.

While torture is not intrinsically immoral, I question its economics.

Genghis Khan, the greatest man ever walked on earth (or on horseback, whatever), reportedly did not use torture in his conquest.

Anyone watched Netflix's Marco Polo yet?

I keep hearing about this Marco Polo guy from kids at the pool.

And of course I am a fan of Kublai Khan.