« First « Previous Comments 55 - 63 of 63 Search these comments
Sometimes I think those Muslims have it right with the way they treat their women.
False dichotomy. The Middle Eastern Islamic countries treat women like property and that's down right evil. Men in America don't have it as bad as women in the Middle East by far, but there is no reason to believe that we have to choose between a misogynous culture or a misandrist one. There are plenty of far better alternatives.
Actually, women love hot, toned, and tattooed douchebags.
Unfortunately, this is true for many women. It's because their genes are assuming that douchebags are more likely to get their genes into the next generation, what scientists call the Sexy Son Hypothesis. If a woman bears the child of a womanizing douchebag that other women also find attractive because he's a douchebag, then any male descendants she has will have douchebag genes and will be attractive to the dumb douchebag-chasing women who will bear his children. Or as women put it, "you want a bad boy you can turn good", except that they never turn him good.
All and all, there's this false notion that a slew of women want to study a hard STEM field and become nuclear engineers but guys have routinely held them them back. In reality, most non-Asian females won't put in the effort to become a nuclear engineer. At best, you'll see the more diligent women go premed than anything else. And many of those women are also Asian. The truth is that the average woman wants more money for less work.
+1
It pisses me off when pseudo-feminists blame STEM workers for the lack of women in STEM when it's the bigotry of non-Asian women that's the cause of that lack.
I am talking about systemic wide exploitation in using a person's body and sexuality to sell anything, whether it is a beer at Hooters, calvin klein jeans or a ticket into a strip joint.
Are you asking men not to be attracted to pictures of attractive women?
Or are you asking advertisers not to use what actually works, but rather to let other companies use it to take revenue and market share?
Or are you asking the people to use the law to restrict freedom of speech because you don't like how it's being used?
Or maybe you're just asking people in general to avoid products that use pictures of attractive women in their ads...
men's continued douchebaggery
BTW, when did the term douchebag, go critical?
Until perhaps a decade ago, the pejorative term, dirtbag, used to encompass a lot of today's douchebags. But then, all of a sudden, we got this massive flux of douchebaggery nationwide.
Does that mean we can partially blame women for men's continued douchebaggery?
It's a positive feedback mechanism called "sexual exaggeration". It's the same reason women have breasts.
+1
It pisses me off when pseudo-feminists blame STEM workers for the lack of women in STEM when it's the bigotry of non-Asian women that's the cause of that lack.
The thing is that the OP is actually, not too disparate from these Femi-Nazis.
In the beginning, she'll say that those Australian prostitutes were trafficked. Then, if/when they show their green cards or Aussie passports, she'll change tack and say that they were conditioned by a male dominated society.
But then, when she sees that many were in fact, students, or earlier working as waitresses, secretaries, accountants, etc, then she'll run and hide because she can't throw the Navy nuclear engineer wannabe credo at us.
However, as soon as the legal hoes with papers disappear from the context, using a few weeks to forget about the earlier situation, we get back to the notion of trafficking women from eastern Europe or South America, and then again it arises ... the idea that men had stopped women from becoming nuclear engineers.
This is the basic pick 'n roll strategies of Femi-Nazis, so that men are tricked into ditching half their income for them. In reality, women will bang douchebags anyways. How about instead, banging a nice guy who's willing to pay for the ride?
This is the basic pick 'n roll strategies of Femi-Nazis, so that men are tricked into ditching half their income for them. In reality, women will bang douchebags anyways. How about instead, banging a nice guy who's willing to pay for the ride?
And in the land of the free and brave, if a woman shows up and says to me, "Hey look, I'd maxed out my credit cards and have zero savings because I'm a poor saver and I love to shop for useless outfits and jewelery, can we bang, and you can cover this month's rent?"
I'd have to turn her down because I wouldn't know if she were undercover vice squad. In Australia, however, the above wouldn't be an issue.
Women will bang douchebags anyway? Dang, if only I had known years ago.
« First « Previous Comments 55 - 63 of 63 Search these comments
Yes, this will make masculinist heads explode in flames, but there is a distinct correlation between the upward momentum of a tech company and the size of the genitalia of the males who work there. Just open your eyes and look.
Given this fact, there are some important questions to be answered:
1. Are up-and-coming companies deliberately hiring men with large johnsons to attract female staffers?
2. Alternately, could it be that men with a large phallus seeks out and find the up-and-coming companies?
3. Is there a correlation between future financial performance and objectively measured pecker size at the company now?
And yes, the size of a penis is objective. There may be minor cultural and personal differences, but the large majority of women agree pretty closely on how large any member is. Just do a freakin poll of women. The results will always show some men rate far more highly than others. And those men are always the stereotypically men with long schlongs. Which drives the others to distraction.
http://patrick.net/misc/Which+SF+tech+companies+have+the+hottest+women%3F