« First « Previous Comments 60 - 63 of 63 Search these comments
Does that mean we can partially blame women for men's continued douchebaggery?
It's a positive feedback mechanism called "sexual exaggeration". It's the same reason women have breasts.
+1
It pisses me off when pseudo-feminists blame STEM workers for the lack of women in STEM when it's the bigotry of non-Asian women that's the cause of that lack.
The thing is that the OP is actually, not too disparate from these Femi-Nazis.
In the beginning, she'll say that those Australian prostitutes were trafficked. Then, if/when they show their green cards or Aussie passports, she'll change tack and say that they were conditioned by a male dominated society.
But then, when she sees that many were in fact, students, or earlier working as waitresses, secretaries, accountants, etc, then she'll run and hide because she can't throw the Navy nuclear engineer wannabe credo at us.
However, as soon as the legal hoes with papers disappear from the context, using a few weeks to forget about the earlier situation, we get back to the notion of trafficking women from eastern Europe or South America, and then again it arises ... the idea that men had stopped women from becoming nuclear engineers.
This is the basic pick 'n roll strategies of Femi-Nazis, so that men are tricked into ditching half their income for them. In reality, women will bang douchebags anyways. How about instead, banging a nice guy who's willing to pay for the ride?
This is the basic pick 'n roll strategies of Femi-Nazis, so that men are tricked into ditching half their income for them. In reality, women will bang douchebags anyways. How about instead, banging a nice guy who's willing to pay for the ride?
And in the land of the free and brave, if a woman shows up and says to me, "Hey look, I'd maxed out my credit cards and have zero savings because I'm a poor saver and I love to shop for useless outfits and jewelery, can we bang, and you can cover this month's rent?"
I'd have to turn her down because I wouldn't know if she were undercover vice squad. In Australia, however, the above wouldn't be an issue.
Women will bang douchebags anyway? Dang, if only I had known years ago.
« First « Previous Comments 60 - 63 of 63 Search these comments
Yes, this will make masculinist heads explode in flames, but there is a distinct correlation between the upward momentum of a tech company and the size of the genitalia of the males who work there. Just open your eyes and look.
Given this fact, there are some important questions to be answered:
1. Are up-and-coming companies deliberately hiring men with large johnsons to attract female staffers?
2. Alternately, could it be that men with a large phallus seeks out and find the up-and-coming companies?
3. Is there a correlation between future financial performance and objectively measured pecker size at the company now?
And yes, the size of a penis is objective. There may be minor cultural and personal differences, but the large majority of women agree pretty closely on how large any member is. Just do a freakin poll of women. The results will always show some men rate far more highly than others. And those men are always the stereotypically men with long schlongs. Which drives the others to distraction.
http://patrick.net/misc/Which+SF+tech+companies+have+the+hottest+women%3F