« First « Previous Comments 53 - 92 of 157 Next » Last » Search these comments
I'm curious as to the police record of the thung that this cop offed.
a. On what basis is he a thug?
b. What difference does a police record make to being shot in the back whilst posing zero threat to the person who shot you from more than 20ft away?
c. His outstanding warrant was from a family court. The stated previous arrest history hardly makes him a hardened thug - arrested 10 times mostly for failing to pay child support.
Just out of curiosity, how many of PATNET users have run from a cop when he said stop? I haven't.
Well many of the people that post here are SQUARE AS FUCK, so take that into consideration. I can remember numerous times , in my teens, running from the police. A time or two for truancy, and a couple times for being at a party underage.
Well many of the people that post here are SQUARE AS FUCK, so take that into consideration. I can remember numerous times , in my teens, running from the police. A time or two for truancy, and a couple times for being at a party underage.
And apparently each time it would have been perfectly reasonable for you to have been shot in the back... well, as long as no one filmed it.
. I can remember numerous times , in my teens, running from the police.
Any of them for smoking mota?
And apparently each time it would have been perfectly reasonable for you to have been shot in the back... well, as long as no one filmed it.
-----------
Well, i had no criminal record, and im white, so those awaiting more evidence wrt the actual incidents, would have had quite the conundrum as to wether or not the Cop was justified.
Luckily, im light on my feet for a big guy, and certainly smarter than any cop in the history of cops, so I always got away.
Did the shooter know about his violent history of not paying child support, at the time of the encounter
Probably, since it's a good possibility that this officer had arrested this guy before.
At what point is it acceptable to fight with a cop and try and take a weapon away from him?
What are you talking about? Is someone arguing it's OK to fight with a cop?
If you have followed along in discussions here, you would know the answer to that question.
And if you weren't such an idiot, you'd be able to answer a simple question.
..."He would face several similar charges occasionally during the next decade until his last arrest in 2012."
2012 was 25 years ago? What type of calendar do YOU use?
Similar to what? Child support non-payment or assault?
Go read the past threads about the Michael Brown shooting.
Still can't answer a simple question.
all the difference in the world...
https://www.youtube.com/embed/3T1c7GkzRQQ
What difference does a police record make?
This video does make a good case for no filming police officers with in a few hundred yards.
This video was shot about at about the out of bounds mark. At a wide angle like this, you do get a better perspective of what is going on, rather than just a vignette of the victim only. There's definitely nothing out of context, it is what it is. I think if the photog was closer he wouldn't have caught the dropped taser then the cop retrieving it and placing it by the guy.
Doesn't matter since his union will get him reinstated with full back pay.
Probably if he's tried for being a blood thirsty racist monster, instead of a incompetent cop guilty of first degree murder or any garden veriety of Murder for that matter. But the race angle will be more sensational and many Liberal city officials will get about 10 to 22 months of good policial play out of charging him for killing while white, rather than for what it is. After two years of that, and Obama weighing in during his Democrat campaign whistle tour stops, lolly gagging about race inequality and all of the cracker cops. We'll forget all about what was on video and his lawyers will be able to prove that he didn't pull the trigger because he was a nyi... uh black guy. But because he was incompetent and stressed at work and probably had no business on the force in the first place.
The prequel: "Dash cam video shows the moments before South Carolina police shooting." Although the dash cam video does not excuse what happened later, it does establish the context: how these two imperfect people met that day, and how the situation began to deteriorate.
And, none of them even touched on the question, how did a guy who was stopped for a broken tail light end up dead in a grassy field?
Uh, perhaps because we have a video that shows exactly how that happened. He was shot multiple times in the back and those wounds caused his death. I don't think that's really a question anyone is asking.
Any chance, if Mr. Scott decided to sit in his car and follow the directions of the officer, he might still be alive today?
Any chance if you let an armed thug rape your family, you'd be alive today?
Any chance, if Mr. Scott decided to sit in his car and follow the directions of the officer, he might still be alive today?
Any chance that if a police officer 20+ft away from him and under no threat whatsoever hadn't shot him in the back multiple times he might still be alive today?
Dash cam shows moments before shooting of Walter Scott
Upon further review I have decided that the allegations that Mr Scott was a feeble runner have been exagerated.
I can guarantee he wouldn't have been shot in the back if he was sitting in the seat of the car!
Which isn't the point. Did the police officer have cause to shoot him? That is the point. And I know you are just trolling on this issue. You saw the video. The man was shot down without justifiable cause and then the crime scene was tampered with. If that was your child who had been shot, then you wouldn't be on here making your irrelevant arguments. Why should it be any different if it's someone else's son, someone else's father?
I'll leave you with one additional piece of the puzzle, you do know that it is a felony to commit assault and battery on a police officer, right?
And the actions of the police officer have been considered deserving of prosecution for murder by the justice system, and he has already been sacked by his own police department. Presumably they know more about the circumstances of what happened than you or I, though the video is more than sufficient to realize that the man was gunned down without justifiable cause.
Any chance, if Mr. Scott decided to sit in his car and follow the directions of the officer, he might still be alive today?
Two things must happen for a crime to take place: 1) a criminal must be present, and 2) there must be an opportunity to commit a crime. In this particular case, Mr Scott unknowingly gave the opportunity to commit crime to the criminal disguised as a police officer and that criminal took the opportunity.
Alpo, it was CIC that said that, not Bigsby. I'm sure Bigsby would appreciate a correction.
some white collar crime does not require presence...
Two things must happen for a crime to take place: 1) a criminal must be present,
Blind obedience to armed authority is a recipe for disaster. The police are accountable to the citizenry, not vice versa. These are public servants. The one thing that will save this and any country is a citizenry that will stand up for its rights, and not blindly obey. A country that is ruled by criminals (e.g. Hank Paulson, Robert Rubin, Jon Corzine) has no law.
So if I understand this correctly, the real problem is that it's currently illegal to off a thug that's running away from the police.
this is the commonality between all these sensationalized shootings.
Also, running from authority, resisting arrest and physically assaulting ARMED authority is a recipe for disaster.
So if I understand this correctly, the real problem is that it's currently illegal to off a thug that's running away from the police.
The issue of who is the thug is up for discussion, but yes, fleeing suspects may only be shot if they are deemed to pose a threat to others. I suppose the deceased SC victim could have posed a threat to other partners when he stopped paying child support.
But, "he was a loving father of 4 children".
CIC-you are making a bigger idiot of yourself than you usually do. The bottom line is that a man was shot in the back multiple times while running/walking quickly away from a police officer. There is absolutely no rationale that can justify it. NONE. There was no imminent threat to anyone.
That was a quote from your favorite MSM sources... Apparently shirking responsibility for child support for years is OK with your favorite liberal media sources..
Great job trying to shift the story to the deadbeat Dad. Do you ever think about why you are sticking up for a cop that shot an unarmed man that was running AWAY from him?
It's pretty obvious the cop is guilty and will be strung up accordingly.
However, that does not give the perp a free ride for initiating the sequence of events.
Put all the facts on the table. Then string up the cop.
Fuck being "PC"....
That was a quote from your favorite MSM sources... Apparently shirking responsibility for child support for years is OK with your favorite liberal media sources..
Great job trying to shift the story to the deadbeat Dad. Do you ever think about why you are sticking up for a cop that shot an unarmed man that was running AWAY from him?
Do you ever think about why you are sticking up for a cop that shot an unarmed man that was running AWAY from him?
Would you like to show ONE instance where I said that here in this thread?
Where you said what?
Do you ever think about why you are sticking up for a cop that shot an unarmed man that was running AWAY from him?
Because if all cops did that, we would have a lot less crime, and less people in prison too.
« First « Previous Comments 53 - 92 of 157 Next » Last » Search these comments
Cold blooded murder.
--------
South Carolina cop charged with murder after video shows him shooting black man dead
White South Carolina police officer will be charged with murder over the shooting death of a black man who appeared to be fleeing from him, local authorities said on Tuesday.
A video of the Saturday incident, in which North Charleston police officer Michael Slager appeared to shoot a man identified by local media as 50-year-old Walter Scott, was viewed by state investigators, and a decision was made to charge Slager with murder, North Charleston Mayor Keith Summey told a news conference.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/04/south-carolina-cop-charged-with-murder-after-video-shows-him-shooting-black-man-dead/