Comments 1 - 12 of 12 Search these comments
Logan, thank you for sharing.
Price to income ratio has always been one of the key indicators in whether the housing market growth is sustainable.
On falling homeownership, the real worry is educational attainment--not student debt loads http://brook.gs/1UvZzeg
Let's see what happens when a 20% down payment is required, interest rates return to a historical norm, and buyers are required to have half-way decent credit. Watch prices come crashing down, just like 2008.
Logan, that's not necessarily the case.
By increasing the educational attainment of the individuals represented by the blue line, the effect will be to bring down the red and green lines. The pie is only so big, isn't it? That might be your next lesson at Anderson ;-)
Go Bruins, class of '04 here!
Let's see what happens when a 20% down payment is required, interest rates return to a historical norm
They will never do something as crazy as mandate a 20% down payment in America.
Rates move with inflation
By increasing the educational attainment of the individuals represented by the blue line
Median base pay for college grads 2014 $ 48K-54K adjust that to wage growth numbers for private sector contract jobs = your future home buyer
Service sector, low educated, low service pay jobs = life long renter unless you're a 2nd wage earner that has a better paid partner
What happen in 1996-2007 wasn't a bubble, it was great economic demographics, but... we had way too many natural renters become home owners and then the speculation factor kicked in which allowed too much leverage debt into the system that has a non capacity owning factor to the model
Massive Massive uptick in demographics for 1980's and 1990's not so much lately, but demographic economics for housing ownership will be positive soon. However, no more exotic debt left, which is very healthy, no more speculation, have to earn it now. This is a positive
What happen in 1996-2007 wasn't a bubble
--------------
I wish i could book your bets
I wish i could book your bets
Not all that demand was fake, demographic economics for housing was good, the prime age labor force which was great for housing peaked in 2007 and we are slowing growing that again.
The Bubble aspect came in 2003-2006 where the speculation factor and the over investment thesis came into play in a major factor with a big multiplier effect.
So, 1996-2007 wasn't a bubble but 2003-2006 was a mass over investment thesis bubble on the worst kind of debt to an economy... Housing debt.
When you have that kind of speculation and over investment, then you get a blow out tops in construction and sales and then big massive drop off in demand for both
DieBankOfAmericaPhukkingDie says
Let's see what happens when a 20% down payment is required
You radical types are scary.
History will repeat itself:
Housing will crash
Foreclosures will jump
Investors will swoop in
Home builders will stop building
Rents will go sky-high.
#Housing
#Economics
A few key points
1. No bubble this time around, the demand is real
2. Housing affordability in CA is horrible but what else is new, no real way to change this
3. High cost for builders to build out in CA and especially Orange County
4. Commercial is booming hot 1-2 years of rate of growth left in that cycle, you're paying a pretty penny for anything out there
A good long chat with the Head Economist of Truila and Have tons of chart I can show if any of you have questions