« First « Previous Comments 122 - 137 of 137 Search these comments
China and communist thug regimes want to limit access to competing ideas proactively because they are insecure about their worldview and know that it's corrupt.
Why do you vote for people who want to send as much High Tech subcontracting China's way?
FortWayne says: " Dumb ass president."
Which dumb ass president said, DOH! Iraq has WMD
killing ~ 4500 servicemen based on a LIE.
If one sits on their dumb ass on 9/11, are they complicit
with the death & destruction.
Idiot brainwashed Republicans can't escape the facts.
Mateen dined in Saudi Arabia, stayed at luxurious accomodations.
Not bad on a security guard's salary.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/06/14/mateens-twin-trips-to-saudi-arabia-raise-suspicions.html
Mateen dined in Saudi Arabia, stayed at luxurious accomodations.
Not bad on a security guard's salary.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/06/14/mateens-twin-trips-to-saudi-arabia-raise-suspicions.html
His dad the Taliban supporter sells life insurance door to door. I can't help suspecting somebody may have bought multiple policies for the maximum benefits. (Although Islam prohibits insurance and lending at interest, the Saudis have proven notably flexible in some instances, while incredibly strict in others, depending on whatever suits their omnipotent ego extension, aka themselves.) If somebody bought policies, then I wonder who paid the premiums and who the beneficiaries are.
I repeat....WE NEVER TARGET CIVILIANS. Collateral damage is acceptable.
So let's follow that statement to it's logical conclusion. If civilians are never targeted, drones are highly ineffective(see above smidgen of links). Once it's known that drones are highly ineffective, but they continue being used, what is MIC now saying... That they support targeting civilians.
Lets follow the facts. Drones are highly effective in taking out terrorists. Otherwise we would not do it. It is impossible to always expect no collateral damage.
Remind me to never go hunting with you Cheney Jr, Don't want to be caught in your "acceptable collateral damage" radius.
Make sure you never dial 911 for an ambulance. Collateral damage is common while answering 911 calls.
By the way, if Mateen and his wife cased Disney, that shows his primary motive was Jihad, not Anti-gay.
A religious self-hating gay is the fault of the religious upbringing, not the Gay.
Although Islam prohibits insurance
Maybe these idiots think life insurance will prevent their targets from dying.
By the way, if Mateen and his wife cased Disney, that shows his primary motive was Jihad, not Anti-gay.
Excellent analysis. Thanks. :)
By the way, if Mateen and his wife cased Disney, that shows his primary motive was Jihad, not Anti-gay.
A religious self-hating gay is the fault of the religious upbringing, not the Gay.
She has got to do time, unless the caught in a quandary liberal hypocrites regard her as a defenseless weaker sex.
Mateen and his wife cased Disney,
A religious self-hating gay is the fault of the religious upbringing, not the Gay.
True always, and especially where the dad supports the Taliban.
First and foremost, kids are a victim in the environment they grow up in and....
[many]
will follow the teaching/enabling of the parents...
except for some who commit suicide or otherwise escape. At least the New Testament does not command believers to kill apostates, in fact it prohbits that by reiterating "thou shalt do no murder." In contrast, Islam commands it.
Lets follow the facts. Drones are highly effective in taking out terrorists. Otherwise we would not do it. It is impossible to always expect no collateral damage.
So far, I'm the only one who's provided any, showing overwhelmingly that drones don't work. I think what you meant to say is "Let redefine reality to match my bullshit, genocidal viewpoint". By your logic, nuclear bombs are highly effective at taking out terrorists. If you accept collateral damage of hundreds of civilian deaths, why not millions!?
Hey Chairman Mao agrees with you. The Great Leap was super successful, because "collateral damage" is just the way life goes.
Lets follow the facts. Drones are highly effective in taking out terrorists. Otherwise we would not do it. It is impossible to always expect no collateral damage.
So far, I'm the only one who's provided any, showing overwhelmingly that drones don't work. I think what you meant to say is "Let redefine reality to match my bullshit, genocidal viewpoint". By your logic, nuclear bombs are highly effective at taking out terrorists. If you accept collateral damage of hundreds of civilian deaths, why not millions!?
I accept collateral damage as long as it's minimized. Never heard of a war where innocent people don't die.
I accept collateral damage as long as it's minimized. Never heard of a war where innocent people don't die.
Now that's a somewhat less homicidal statement. You might want to re-evaluate drones based on above sentiment. Also the definition of war, especially in relation to eternal war as illustrated by Orwell. I doubt the innocent people who have been killed and driven from their homes would define the US campaign as war...
« First « Previous Comments 122 - 137 of 137 Search these comments
2016 Orlando Shooting >50
2015 San Bernardino Shooting 14
2015 Chattanooga, TN Military Shooting 5
2014 Washington and New Jersey Killing Spree 4
2014 Oklahoma Beheading 1
2013 Boston Marathon Bombing 4
2009 Little Rock Shooting 1
2009 Fort Hood Shooting 13
2006 Seattle Jewish Federation Shooting 1
2002 Los Angeles Airport Shooting 2