patrick.net

thunderlips11 says

neplusultra57 says

the health of governance: campaign finance reform, citizens united, lobbying dollars

I addressed this.

Uh, no you didn't, you never do because the question was qua Trump. As a typical alt-right dodge you just return to Clinton. So in case the fourteenth time's a charm, here's what Rew asked of you, and, in case you're confused: Clinton referents will be a female pronoun while Trump referents will be a male pronoun. "His'' is a possessive form of that male pronoun, so, without further delay, for the fourteenth time:

Rew says

Hillary is no grand answer or fix here. Is Trump? Is that what his campaign is focused on? Restoring the health of governance: campaign finance reform, citizens united, lobbying dollars? You think he works to walk the influence out of politics? Banks? The NRA? Really?

neplusultra57 says

Uh, no you didn't, you never do because the question was qua Trump.

thunderlips11 says

Big Corporations and Wealthy Individuals donate to the Clinton Foundation simply because of their charity work. They don't expect anything in return.

thunderlips11 says

By Sunday evening, Clinton had spoken to more than 2,200 campaign donors. But what she told the crowds remains a mystery.

Clinton has refused to open her fundraisers to journalists, reversing nearly a decade of greater transparency in presidential campaigns and leaving the public guessing at what she's saying to some of her most powerful supporters.

thunderlips11 says

I addressed this. Hillary is no alternative, her actions contradict her words diametrically. Trump doesn't have enough of a record. His receipts are piddling compared to hers, and he's barely spending much money at all. He's actually being criticized for spending so little.

thunderlips11 says

BTW, she tried to convince everybody she was all Campaign Finance-y before running against Obama in 2008. She criticized him for not agreeing to limits, while not limiting herself.

http://www.politico.com/story/2008/02/clinton-hits-obama-on-funds-008560

thunderlips11 says

Here's the video of Elizabeth Warren discussing the meeting she had with Hillary, where the Law Professor clearly detailed to Hillary why the Bill was a Cock Suck for Banks, and Hillary claimed she would see it defeated.

Anybody who believes the Queen of Fundraising - her and her husband are much coddled by her own party for the amount of money they bring in under current Campaign Laws - is serious about Campaign Reform is thunderously naive, as her actions are, I repeat, diametrically contradicted by her actions.

And it's moot on practical political grounds, as Hillary is so fond of using as an excuse not to push for single payer. Barring a miracle, she'll be facing a resurgent Country Club Republican House that will never support it. We can expect more political grandstanding, with Mother Fracker half-heartedly proposing Campaign Reform, with the de-Trumped Republicans opposing it, both sides accusing each other in the usual culture war bullshit fashion.

Never a thing you can say about your glorious leader, eh? Try for sixteen?

It's creepy af to watch Clinton voters, accuse Clinton detractors of not considering what Trump might do as President, when Hillarys campaign slogan is "we must work together to stop Trump".

But I understand that words are more important than actions, and we have to first elect Clinton to see whats in her; after our terrorist enemies (saudi arabia), and 0.1% oppressors support her and shower her with money, she will come out the other side as president, ready to do a 180 and begin working for the people, against the wishes of her money masters. Which is precisely why those Great Americans the Kochs, support her.

errc says

she will come out the other side as president

"I being told that by a lot a really smart, wonderful, beautiful people, the best people, really rich fans of mine."