Comments 1 - 17 of 17 Search these comments
It's strange the fascination with this. I mean the average 70 year-old man isn't exactly known for the best of health. But hey, his long-term doctor wrote him a glowing report even if it rather read like the Donald had dictated it himself, though of course we all know that couldn't be possible.
If Hillary croaks, we get TPP-loving Virginia/DC Suburb Senator Tim Kaine. If it was Liz Warren or Bernie or Greyson or Sherrod Brown, now that would be a different story...
It's strange the fascination with this. I mean the average 70 year-old man isn't exactly known for the best of health. But hey, his long-term doctor wrote him a glowing report even if it rather read like the Donald had dictated it himself, though of course we all know that couldn't be possible.
He's offered to release his if she releases hers. How come 'appears to be healthy' Clinton doesn't take up Trump on this, then use the leverage to talk about his Tax Return?
He's offered to release his if she releases hers. How come 'appears to be healthy' Clinton doesn't take up Trump on this, then use the leverage to talk about his Tax Return?
Would that be by the same doctor who wrote "astonishingly excellent" and that "if elected, Mr Trump, I can state unequivocally, will be the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency" on his last report or by someone, how can we say, slightly more impartial? The historical pattern is for private medical records to remain just that, private. Who has released a substantial body of information before? McCain (still selective) and...? What no doubt carefully selected info would be deemed acceptable? Let me guess...
Tax records on the other hand have a strong history of being released.
Just release your medical records, HILLARY!
It's that simple!
You've exhibited strange (some would dare say bizarre) tics, coughing fits, odd head/eye/neck movements, and you have a documented history of falls and blood clots, thrombosis, etc.
Things less serious than blood clots (maybe brain bleeds, even) would be sufficient cause to warrant a full and accurate release of a candidate's health records.
Proud to not give a SHIT about what's in TPP, but it's not going to pass. The next bill I get behind will be for American workers. I can give two shits about what's best for the World Bank.
How do you know if it's good for the World Bank if you are clueless about its content?
He's offered to release his if she releases hers. How come 'appears to be healthy' Clinton doesn't take up Trump on this,
Because she knows he's a lying sac of shit, and she is already way ahead of him on the transparency front. Why doesn't he respect you enough to tell you about his stds, erectile dysfunction, and general morbidity himself?
Somebody wake me when dead journalist bodies start floating to shore on Atlantic City beaches. Only then, will people know she is serious.
How do you know if it's good for the World Bank if you are clueless about its content?
And how do I know what gay people do in their bedroom at night, but I'm not going to pop my head in and see.
You're right it was a bad analogy I should harken it to peeping in on live Animal sex acts with transvestite latex clad gimps.
Hey did you guys ever figure out what was in Obamacare by chance?
I wasn't a fan of that either if you recall. Also if your recall my analysis was spot on for being one of the 5 billion people on the planet that didn't read it.
Bump because of #Girtherism
This thread was just a few days before Hillary collapsed at the 9/11 memorial.
WTF?
Why don't they just put out a list of pre-approved and dis-approved questions FFS! (That's right; they actually nearly already do).
Thanks for doing a bang-up job, LAME ASS STREAM MEDIA!!!
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/294910-clinton-campaign-warns-media-to-tread-carefully
Clinton campaign warns media to tread carefully
Â
By Amie Parnes - 09/08/16 06:00 AM EDT
Hillary Clinton’s campaign is working the refs hard when it comes to reports about her health.Â
While Clinton responded to a fit of coughing this week with humor, saying she was “allergic†to GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump, her aides and surrogates played the role of bad cop.Â
Campaign spokesman Nick Merrill took to task an NBC reporter who wrote about the coughing spell, posting on Twitter that the writer should “get a life.â€
The five-paragraph story, by Andrew Rafferty, was titled “Hillary Clinton fights back coughing attack†and reported that the “frog in Clinton’s throat on Monday was one of the most aggressive she’s had during her 2016 run.â€
Jon Favreau, a former speechwriter for President Obama, asked via Twitter if “anyone on NBC, or anywhere else,†was willing to defend the piece.Â
The pushback signaled that Clinton’s campaign intends to sharply counterattack news organizations that take questions about her health seriously. "
#SickHillary