patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,364,387 comments by 15,735 users - komputodo online now
Clinton Foundation gives Russia nuclear superiority over USA
2016 Oct 11, 6:50am 13,770 views 33 comments
by Y follow (4)
Comments 1 - 7 of 33 Next » Last » Search these comments
Tenpoundbass
@
2016 Oct 11, 6:53am
Obama took the missle defense out of Europe, we're at Russia's mercy whether we like it or not.
We need another Reagan to rid the world of Nukes AGAIN!
Why are Liberals such War Pigs?
FNWGMOBDVZXDNW
@
2016 Oct 11, 7:24am
Oh shit. We have 7100 and they have 7300? We're fucked. Need... More... Nukes...
Tenpoundbass
@
2016 Oct 11, 8:04am
NO dipshit we need a defense shield in Europe but Obama the Kenyan terrorist thought better of it.
Y
@
2016 Oct 11, 9:14am
Totally missed the point.
You don't give away the singular element that has kept WWIII at bay for the past 65 years.
This trend can be reversed in a heartbeat, and you better have the resources to keep up.
A viable strategy for an opponent would be to hoard as much of the opponent's resources as possible prior to ramping up themselves.
Oh shit. We have 7100 and they have 7300? We're fucked. Need... More... Nukes...
FNWGMOBDVZXDNW
@
2016 Oct 11, 10:05am
Totally missed the point.
You don't give away the singular element that has kept WWIII at bay for the past 65 years.
Jesus Christ. Neither the US nor Russia is limited by raw materials when deciding how many nukes to have on hand. We reduced the number by treaties, where we agreed that the world would be safer if we had less of these to look after. We both still have more than enough to blow the other country to smithereens. I focused on the # of nukes (with my sarcastic comment), b/c you chose to put up that graphic. If you want to focus on the strategic aspect of giving away mineral rights, then you should focus your argument better. Plus, if you look at the amount they harvested from their mine in WY, you will find that it is a very small amount of material.
junkmail
@
2016 Oct 11, 10:15am
we need sumone to remember to close their italics.
here we go... hows that?
Y
@
2016 Oct 11, 10:19am
Totally missed the point.
You don't allow your enemies to own any businesses in your country. They become fronts for spywork, trojan horse infiltration and such.,..
And you don't personally profit from the maneuver as a government representitive...
Jesus Christ. Neither the US nor Russia is limited by raw materials when deciding how many nukes to have on hand. We reduced the number by treaties, where we agreed that the world would be safer if we had less of these to look after.
Comments 1 - 7 of 33 Next » Last » Search these comments
Who the fuck in their right mind gives Russia control over any of our uranium (read "nuclear") resources?
This is the poster child of "Treason"...
Russia:
March 2016 New START declaration: 1,735 strategic warheads deployed on 521 ICBMs, SLBMs, and strategic bombers.(Note: In March 2016, the U.S. State Department issued the latest fact sheet on its data exchange with Russia under New START, sharing the numbers of deployed nuclear warheads and New START-accountable delivery systems held by each country.)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-04-23/how-putin-s-russia-gained-control-of-a-u-s-uranium-mine
#Treason