patrick.net

The media 'rigged' the primary against Bernie

They posted the superdelegate votes in Hillarys tally six months before they went to vote

zzyzzx is deplorable says

OK, so the Clinton Foundation spends 4% of their money on actual charity and that's OK with you?

You're an idiot. It gives 5.7% of its money to outside projects. The rest of the programs (for a total of nearly 90% of the income) are done in house. It's very simple to check and is why it gets very high ratings from charity watchdogs. You really shouldn't get your CF 'facts' from your right-wing websites.

Thunderlips Russian Agent 0069 says

Said the lady who claimed she was the victim of a "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy"

Lol, excellent point!

Loretta Lynch just happened to meet Bill Clinton by pure serendipity at that airfield on the eve of his wife being very suspiciously cleared of her Email Investigation.

"A random encounter, on the midnight train going anywhere..."
Don't stop Believing... hold on to the bullshit feeling...

Thunderlips Russian Agent 0069 says

Remember, Saudi Arabia loves Women's Rights. Hillary should never give back that Money.

David Duke supports Trump, hence, Trump is disqualified. Bigtime racist...bigly

Rashomon says

zzyzzx is deplorable says

OK, so the Clinton Foundation spends 4% of their money on actual charity and that's OK with you?

You're an idiot. It gives 5.7% of it's money to outside projects. The rest of the programs (for a total of nearly 90% of the income) are done in house. It's very simple to check and is why it gets very high ratings from charity watchdogs. You really shouldn't get your CF 'facts' from your right-wing websites.

Lol!

Rashomon says

You're an idiot.

http://nypost.com/2015/04/26/charity-watchdog-clinton-foundation-a-slush-fund/

Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’

The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid.

The group spent the bulk of its windfall on administration, travel, and salaries and bonuses, with the fattest payouts going to family friends.

On its 2013 tax forms, the most recent available, the foundation claimed it spent $30 million on payroll and employee benefits; $8.7 million in rent and office expenses; $9.2 million on “conferences, conventions and meetings”; $8 million on fundraising; and nearly $8.5 million on travel. None of the Clintons is on the payroll, but they do enjoy first-class flights paid for by the foundation.

In all, the group reported $84.6 million in “functional expenses” on its 2013 tax return and had more than $64 million left over — money the organization has said represents pledges rather than actual cash on hand.

She's experience politician, master liar

Tenpoundbass says

Trump starts off slow but he starts slugging. Though I must say that old broad is one slippery slimmy tough cookie.

He needs to step it up on her, she can't handle pressure. Slow debates are her element

Hillary stood by her Iraq War even in 2008.

And Trump expressed skepticism before the war twice, once on Cavuto and once on Hannity.

MOSUL is not on the Syrian Border, by the way. It's many miles from the border. And Obama isn't helping to clear out Mosul to get rid of ISIS. He's doing it to make them flee into Syria and make life harder for the Syrian Army to retake the country.

"Dangerous" is not an insult at the subconscious level when people evaluate manliness.

zzyzzx is deplorable says

The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid.

The group spent the bulk of its windfall on administration, travel, and salaries and bonuses, with the fattest payouts going to family friends.

Absolute nonsense. This is the same idiotic bullshit that CIC tried to peddle last time using their filings that proved him to be wrong. They run their own programs. Do you think that doesn't require salaries, admin, travel etc. etc? The salaries are clearly stated in the filing and are divided between those running the charity and those implementing the programs, the vast amount going to the latter. You are simply wrong on this. Look at the tax filings, read the reports from the watchdogs. You can argue that they got money from dubious sources. You can't argue that they didn't spend that money on programs. They did.

Take a deep breath trump

Think of the children!

Rashomon says

Absolute nonsense.

From a liberal newspaper?

Give it up already, You are clearly wrong and owned,

Did she just try to connect a Radical Mosque in Queens with Donald's birthplace?

By the way, who is in this Mosque? Muslim IMMIGRANTS.

He says Industry that like Grandpa from Brooklyn. Love it.

zzyzzx is deplorable says

From a liberal newspaper?

Give it up already, You are clearly wrong and owned,

Don't be stupid. You claimed that they only spent 4.7% on programs. They spend nearly 90%. That's not being owned by you, you idiot. That is showing you how stupid and utterly wrong you are. Use your brain for once and think what it requires for a charity to run its own programs and then go and look at their tax filings and try and understand what they say. That NYP report just jumped on the right-wing posts and misreported what the charity did. Charity Navigator didn't put the CF on a watchlist. There was an issue with the way that they were structured that didn't fit in with their assessment system for a time - that wasn't a watchlist. If you click on them, then you can see that it is now rated - 95%.

If he presses her she'll lose, not sure why is he letting her play so calmly.

Ironman says

FortWayne says

She's experience politician, master liar

That's exactly it. She's well polished with all her lies and talking points, where he is still talking in generalities and not in detail.

This isn't going to help her.

Most Americans date the point the country started to decline sometime around the late 80s/early 90s.

FortWayne says

If he presses her she'll lose, not sure why is he letting her play so calmly.

He missed some golden opportunities. Not as strong as the 2nd debate, but not as weak as the 1st.

Rashomon says

Don't be stupid. You claimed that they only spent 4.7% on programs. They spend nearly 90%

You are terrible at math

9/140 is around 6%

If she is going to continue Obama's policies, and the middle class and home ownership has been declining under Obama ... why vote for her?

Hillary grew up in Poverty? Ha! Wealthiest Neighborhood in Chicago, father owned interests in multiple factories, including the Scranton Lace Factory.

She reminds me of Leonard Nemoys role in Brave New World.

Such a nasty woman.

When Farakhan and the Republican Candidate agree on something, you should pay attention.
www.youtube.com/embed/cu41CPQw0hg

That's one wicked women.

Come on Trump if you don't drain the Swamp you lost

Very strong closing statement.

Rather boring debate.

The second was one for the ages.

zzyzzx is deplorable says

You are terrible at math

9/140 is around 6%

You are an idiot. Go to their tax filings and do the maths. Close to 90% of their income is spent on programs. The Charity watchdog that report uses to attack the foundation rates it at 95% overall, finances at 97.5%, accountability and transparency at 93%. That makes it an extremely highly rated charity. Those are facts. Your arguments are simply wrong and come direct from a complete misunderstanding of the tax filings and how the CF operates. It doesn't pass on its funds to other charities (except 5.7%), it runs its own programs. What do you find so difficult to understand about that except your knee-jerk dislike of anything relating to Clinton?

CNN says "Clinton has spoken nearly 5 minutes more than Trump"

Man he should have drained the swamp for his closer but he would have needed 11 minutes.

If he needed to blow her out of the water, then he singularly failed.

He missed some chances: Citigroup Executive vetting Obama's Cabinet (that she was a part of), that she's the recipient of the most bundled corporate executive cash in US history, and everything else #DrainTheSwamp related.

But all that would have been more than 11 minutes.

That comment about waiting to decide whether he would accept the election results was a disgrace.

He won't be a pussy like Al Gore, if that's what you mean.

Rashomon says

That comment about waiting to decide whether he would accept the election results was a disgrace.

Considering how much voter fraud has already been found, would you?

Rashomon says

If he needed to blow her out of the water, then he singularly failed.

But she didn't do so well herself. She looked as slippery and coached as always.

zzyzzx is deplorable says

Considering how much voter fraud has already been found, would you?

Anybody that isn't a partisan idiot knows that voter fraud is a minor issue. He is questioning the integrity of the voting system, one that is, overall, very robust. It's utterly pathetic from him and he's only doing it because he's currently lagging.

Rashomon says

Anybody that isn't a partisan idiot knows that voter fraud is a minor issue.

IN a close race, it's a big issue. Plus there are millions of dead people on voter rolls nationwide, and in some states, illegal aliens can vote. How is that not massive fraud?

Over 4 Million Dead People Still on US Voting Rolls
http://gunsnfreedom.com/voting-expert-over-4-million-dead-people-still-on-us-voting-rolls/6506

How is 4 million small?

How is having 108% of the vote in some districts going to Obama not fraud?