patrick.net

zzyzzx is deplorable says

What's ridiculous s how a supposed charity only uses something like 6% of their money for actual charitable work. This needs to be investigated for fraud, among other things.

What's ludicrous is that you are still peddling that line when it's a blatant lie. 5.7% is given to other charities. The Clinton Foundation, despite its name, functions as a charity - the programs are run in house - constituting the other 80%+ of spending. Seriously, how exactly do you think it would get an A rating from charity watchers (and 95% from the site, Charity Navigator, mentioned in your linked article) if it was only using 6% of its donations? You're just embarrassing yourself at this point, but hey, I'll wait for your next repetition of this obvious and previously debunked lie - try any fact checking site you like if you aren't willing to accept what I am saying. Hell, read the tax returns - they clearly show you to be wrong. Try the 2014 one and scroll down to page 10 and then come back here and admit how stupid you've been. I won't hold my breath.

errc says

Somehow, you dumb twits equate objective criticism of Hillary, as support for Trump.

Your views on Hillary are not objective.

Let's pretend for a minute that Hillary is as bad as you say. If that were the case, you could focus on that entirely and be factually correct. However, wisdom would require that you also take an objective look at the other guy and come up with a balanced look at the race.

Just to reiterate - your views on Hillary are far from objective. You repeat the absolute worst of the conspiracy theories in spite of lots of evidence to the contrary.

Rashomon, save your keyboard. There is nothing rational over there with regards to feelings on Clinton or the foundation. It's dangerous wounded animal time. (Anger : stage one of denial.)

lostand confused says

This image appears to show one man taking a break from tossing another man's salad and shaking his head like a dog to dry the slobber off his face. Is this based on a scene from a Trump rally?

FortWayne says

Trump did well at first, kind of went off on tangents mid debate.

Here's a Trump supporter who isn't completely blind. I mean - based on the totality of your other posts, you are probably legally blind. But this somewhat fair, but generous, assessment of Trump's debate performances highlights the ironic truth:
#LoserDonald lacks the mental STAMINA to stand toe to toe with Her and keep focused for 90 minutes. He can fly around the country and rant all he wants, but he is too ADHD (I'm guessing that's his problem) to do serious work and has laughably little mental stamina. If he weren't such a narcissistic fool, he would just go get treatment.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/george-sachs-psyd/unfit-unfocused-or-is-tru_b_11568002.html

Rew says

I don't think anyone watching would claim a 6+ bump is possible for Trump off it

The biggest danger for Clinton is something like the Veritas project video gaining credence. I believe that people will be investigating this to corroborate, refute, or fill out this story.

There are also a few more weeks to go, so other things could happen.

Plus, #LoserDonald could pull off a surprise if he pulls close to Her but does not pass Her in the polls.

So, he doesn't really need a 6+ bump in the polls. Fortunately, I think polls will show that she won this debate handily. I'm surprised it was only by 13 pts according to this: http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/19/politics/hillary-clinton-wins-third-presidential-debate-according-to-cnn-orc-poll/index.html

Donald gets angry after a few public jabs in the national spotlight. Always has.

The majority of his campaign has been reactionary ... both in policy, message, and campaign. He reacts.

YesY, I agree. The gap isn't big enough to consider Clinton home free. In an election where the news cycle is rocked almost daily there are still a number of days left. You are very right.

Clinton's race to lose still, and I think more ground was gained from last night.

Project Veritas is going to wither under scrutiny.

When #LoserDonald claimed that all of the accusers are lying, I couldn't help but wonder how many more women are sitting on the fence about going public with their story. Will his latest attacks make more come forward in defense of the victims?

Another woman has stepped up to accuse Donald of groping this morning.
http://people.com/politics/new-accuser-tearfully-alleges-trump-assaulted-her-at-u-s-open-he-said-dont-you-know-who-i-am/