The first 100 horrific days of a Trump presidency
invite response
2016 Nov 5, 7:24am 20,112 views 75 comments
« First « Previous Comments 68 - 75 of 75 Search these comments
68
joeyjojojunior
2017 Nov 7, 1:09pm
Sniper says
That was the primary. I'm talking general election.
OK, even Nate said he fucked up, but YOU still won't admit it:
How I Acted Like A Pundit And Screwed Up On Donald Trump
Trump’s nomination shows the need for a more rigorous approach.
By Nate Silver
Filed under 2016 Election
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-i-acted-like-a-pundit-and-screwed-up-on-donald-trump
That was the primary. I'm talking general election.
69
joeyjojojunior
2017 Nov 7, 1:10pm
PaisleyPattern says
Sure--out of context and very old. Most are 2015 for God's sake.
Look at his writing in Oct and Nov. 2016
Those are his quotes aren’t they?
Sure--out of context and very old. Most are 2015 for God's sake.
Look at his writing in Oct and Nov. 2016
70
joeyjojojunior
2017 Nov 7, 1:13pm
Sniper says
That's also BS.
https://www.good.is/articles/hillary-clinton-negative-press
"It’s no secret that, from the moment she announced her candidacy back in April 2015, Hillary Clinton has been bludgeoned by negative media coverage. The email server; the Wall Street speaking fees; the attacks from both Trump and Sanders. I’ve debated with people who legitimately fear she will be imprisoned before the election. Some, despite the venomous dismissal of my rolling eyes, have called her a murderer. Others: an old woman, a plutocrat, a crook, abused by her husband, no backbone to speak of. But if you’ve suspected that there’s a reason people are saying these things—perhaps parroting disproportionately negative stories they’ve consumed in the media over the past year-and-a-half—it turns out you’re right.
A new report released this week by Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics, and Public Policy found Clinton has received far more negative coverage than any other candidate in the race thus far. The study was based on an analysis of news statements from CBS, Fox, the Los Angeles Times, NBC, the New York Times, USA Today, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post."
Hillary had 90% of the media on her side
That's also BS.
https://www.good.is/articles/hillary-clinton-negative-press
"It’s no secret that, from the moment she announced her candidacy back in April 2015, Hillary Clinton has been bludgeoned by negative media coverage. The email server; the Wall Street speaking fees; the attacks from both Trump and Sanders. I’ve debated with people who legitimately fear she will be imprisoned before the election. Some, despite the venomous dismissal of my rolling eyes, have called her a murderer. Others: an old woman, a plutocrat, a crook, abused by her husband, no backbone to speak of. But if you’ve suspected that there’s a reason people are saying these things—perhaps parroting disproportionately negative stories they’ve consumed in the media over the past year-and-a-half—it turns out you’re right.
A new report released this week by Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics, and Public Policy found Clinton has received far more negative coverage than any other candidate in the race thus far. The study was based on an analysis of news statements from CBS, Fox, the Los Angeles Times, NBC, the New York Times, USA Today, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post."
71
anonymous
2017 Nov 7, 1:31pm
joeyjojojunior says
Nate Silver did call it much closer at the end than a lot of others reading the polls.
PaisleyPattern says.Those are his quotes aren’t they?
Sure--out of context and very old. Most are 2015 for God's sake.
Look at his writing in Oct and Nov. 2016
Nate Silver did call it much closer at the end than a lot of others reading the polls.
72
anonymous
2017 Nov 7, 1:39pm
errc says
Trump isn’t really a Republican and doesn’t have the support of the Republican Party. That’s why it he isn’t able to push his agenda. The Republicans are blocking him. I believe eventually he will gain support from both sides of the aisle and will begin to move forward.
achieves some successes
————
How much longer are you going to hold your breath? Oh, I almost forgot. Even though they hold absolute power of all branches of government, they are still thwarted by the media and some wimpy string beans at Berkeley.
Do you realize how this makes you look?
Trump isn’t really a Republican and doesn’t have the support of the Republican Party. That’s why it he isn’t able to push his agenda. The Republicans are blocking him. I believe eventually he will gain support from both sides of the aisle and will begin to move forward.
73
PaisleyPattern
2017 Nov 7, 1:42pm
Trump isn’t really a Republican and doesn’t have the support of the Republican Party. That’s why it he isn’t able to push his agenda. The Republicans are blocking him. I believe eventually he will gain support from both sides of the aisle and will begin to move forward.
74
PaisleyPattern
2017 Nov 7, 2:21pm
The people blocking him most are McCain, Corker and Flake. One has cancer and two are retiring. Trump will soon have control of the party and things will start moving.
75
joeyjojojunior
2017 Nov 7, 3:40pm
Sniper says
It's a Harvard study, you moron.
Just how deep do you have to dig to find links that support your bullshit? Couldn't you find one on Mother Jones or Think Progress?
It's a Harvard study, you moron.
« First « Previous Comments 68 - 75 of 75 Search these comments
Sadly, this sounds about right to me.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-first-100-horrific-days-of-a-trump-presidency/2016/11/04/1abca4d2-a286-11e6-a44d-cc2898cfab06_story.html