« First « Previous Comments 139 - 178 of 258 Next » Last » Search these comments
I had lot's of Muslim friends, and still do. They don't have slaves. It's against the law in this country.
It's illegal in every country on the planet. And it still occurs in every country on the planet.
Actually it matters quite a lot what Muslims should be doing according to Islam.
The terrorists are extremely honest about this. It is perhaps their only good feature.
It's illegal in every country on the planet. And it still occurs in every country on the planet.
It is not illegal in Islam. Islam is not a country.
And they are committing terrorism, slavery, and disgusting sharia laws.
How many Muslims are there? How many are members of terrorist groups?
Actually it matters quite a lot what Muslims should be doing according to Islam.
The terrorists are extremely honest about this. It is perhaps their only good feature.
Not really. Every single religious text can be manipulated in one way or another. The fact that Muslims take the Quran as the literal truth and yet the vast majority don't do what you are speaking of, rather points to additional factors at play, wouldn't you say?
It is not illegal in Islam. Islam is not a country.
It's not illegal according to the Bible either, so what is your point?
Like I said, most of them are good human beings exactly because they don't take Islam all that seriously.
It's the ones who really mean it who are the problem.
And they are committing terrorism, slavery, and disgusting sharia laws.
How many Muslims are there? How many are members of terrorist groups?
Most of the 1.6 billion Muslims practice the sharia laws.
Like I said, most of them are good human beings exactly because they don't take Islam all that seriously.
It's the ones who really mean it who are the problem.
Except the vast majority of Muslims do take their religion seriously. They just don't take it the way you seem to want to paint it.
It is not illegal in Islam. Islam is not a country.
It's not illegal according to the Bible either, so what is your point?
Unlike the Muslims, Christians don't practice it anymore.
Most of the 1.6 billion Muslims practice the sharia laws.
Familiar with those, are you?
Except the vast majority of Muslims do take their religion seriously. They just don't take it the way you seem to want to paint it.
It's not about how I want to paint it. Islam is pretty damn clear, and pretty fucking violent, an order of magnitude beyond any other other religion.
Except the vast majority of Muslims do take their religion seriously.
That's the problem. We want Muslims to give up violence, sharia laws, and human rights abuses. What's wrong with that?
You could make a decent argument that fundamentalist Jews are nearly as bad as Muslims in their willingness to implement their religious law literally.
But Christianity is more ambiguous. Clearly the old laws do not apply to Christians. They eat pork, for example. Jesus' main rule was "love your neighbor as yourself", and deliberately flouted the old law by eating without washing his hands to make a point, for example.
That's the problem. We want Muslims to give up violence, sharia laws, and human rights abuses. What's wrong with that?
There's nothing wrong with that (though plenty of aspects of sharia law are actually pretty innocuous). You seem to think that the Quran is the driving force of what has happened in the last 30+ years. It's rather more complex than that, and the West has been front and centre in helping to create the current situation.
West has been front and centre in helping to create the current situation.
I disagree.
The internet has been front and center in helping to create the current situation.
Now global recruitment for jihad is very easy. Used to be a lot harder.
And how do you explain the Muslim attacks on all the non-Western countries?
That's the problem. We want Muslims to give up violence, sharia laws, and human rights abuses. What's wrong with that?
There's nothing wrong with that (though plenty of aspects of sharia law are actually pretty innocuous). You seem to think that the Quran is the driving force of what has happened in the last 30+ years. It's rather more complex than that, and the West has been front and centre in helping to create the current situation.
The Koran has been the driving force for the last 1400 years. The West did nothing wrong. We believe in equal rights, freedoms, and democracy. Compare that to the Sharia laws, and what the perfect Muslim, Mohammad believed in.
Rashomon is a muslim android.
He is a moderate, peaceful Muslim. Unfortunately, he has been brainwashed by Islam.
But Christianity is more ambiguous. Clearly the old laws do not apply to Christians. They eat pork, for example. Jesus' main rule was "love your neighbor as yourself", and deliberately flouted the old law by eating without washing his hands to make a point, for example.
Post enlightenment. Christianity was not exactly sweetness and light before then, which rather points to the fact that any and all religious texts can be misused by people who want to manipulate others to do their biding.
He is a moderate, peaceful Muslim. Unfortunately, he has been brainwashed by Islam.
Yeah, except I'm an atheist.
He is a moderate, peaceful Muslim. Unfortunately, he has been brainwashed by Islam.
Yeah, except I'm an atheist.
Thank God. So ami I. Why would an atheist go to such lengths to support the actions of Mohammad the Perfect Muslim?
The Koran has been the driving force for the last 1400 years. The West did nothing wrong. We believe in equal rights, freedoms, and democracy. Compare that to the Sharia laws, and what the perfect Muslim, Mohammad believed in.
That is not the history of the West. That is the claims it makes now whilst simultaneously exerting its power over the rest of the world.
Thank God. So ami I. Why would an atheist go to such lengths to support the actions of Mohammad the Perfect Muslim?
I'm not defending anything. I'm pointing out the problems with the stupidly one-sided and wilfully ignorant views that you and others regularly peddle on this site. You are trying to boil down a massively complex situation to the most simplistic of narratives. It doesn't help move things forward.
The Koran has been the driving force for the last 1400 years. The West did nothing wrong. We believe in equal rights, freedoms, and democracy. Compare that to the Sharia laws, and what the perfect Muslim, Mohammad believed in.
That is not the history of the West. That is the claims it makes now whilst simultaneously exerting its power over the rest of the world.
Nothing wrong with exerting your power if it's for the common good. Democracy is the future of the world. When was the last time you saw a democracy attack another democracy? Communists attack each other, religions attack each other, but not democracies. The path to peace lies through the roads of democracy.
Thank God. So ami I. Why would an atheist go to such lengths to support the actions of Mohammad the Perfect Muslim?
I'm not defending anything. I'm pointing out the problems with the stupidly one-sided and wilfully ignorant views that you and others regularly peddle on this site. You are trying to boil down a massively complex situation to the most simplistic of narratives. It doesn't help move things forward.
Peace is not complex. Violent people make it complex. If all Muslims were Buddhists, we would not have any problems at all.
As an atheist you should be convincing Muslims to be peaceful, not trying to convince us that Islam is peaceful, when all we see is Islamic violence.
If all Muslims were Buddhists, we would not have any problems at all.
Nonsense. What do you think's been happening in Myanmar? Religion isn't the problem. People and circumstances are.
Strategist says
As an atheist you should be convincing Muslims to be peaceful, not trying to convince us that Islam is peaceful, when all we see is Islamic violence.
Clearly I'm not going to convince you of anything. Religion is the current tool of those trying to wheel power and influence. If that wasn't to hand, it would be something else.
If all Muslims were Buddhists, we would not have any problems at all.
Nonsense. What do you think's been happening in Myanmar? Religion isn't the problem. People and circumstances are.
How can you as an atheist state religion is not a problem? Are you sure you are an atheist?
Let me ask you a question....Do you think Mohammad the Perfect Muslim was a moral person?
If you are an atheist, you will not have a problem answering that.
Nothing wrong with exerting your power if it's for the common good. Democracy is the future of the world. When was the last time you saw a democracy attack another democracy? Communists attack each other, religions attack each other, but not democracies. The path to peace lies through the roads of democracy.
No, it doesn't. There's nothing to democracy that makes it intrinsically peaceful. Peace has been maintained through a labyrinthian set of apparatus to try and keep the powers in check. That doesn't mean it's always going to be so. The cracks have long since started appearing. Just look at all those crowing about Brexit and wanting the break up of the EU on here. That very organisation has contributed greatly to a period of peace in one of the most unstable regions in the world historically. Who's to say such instability won't return? In fact, it's almost a guarantee once global warming destroys society as we currently know it.
How can you as an atheist state religion is not a problem? Are you sure you are an atheist?
Because it's clearly people and circumstances that are the real problems. Look at the Germans now. Look at them in the 1930s and 40s. People are capable of doing pretty much anything imaginable with or without any particular religion supposedly guiding them. We are apes. Nothing more, nothing less. We are more than capable of the basest of actions given the right (wrong) circumstances.
No, it doesn't. There's nothing to democracy that makes it intrinsically peaceful.
Ever seen a major democracy attack each other? They solve their problems through negotiations and courts. Islam solves it's problems with violence.
Peace has been maintained through a labyrinthian set of apparatus to try and keep the powers in check.
which only democracy can do.
How can you as an atheist state religion is not a problem? Are you sure you are an atheist?
Because it's clearly people and circumstances that are the real problems. Look at the Germans now. Look at them in the 1930s and 40s. People are capable of doing pretty much anything imaginable with or without any particular religion supposedly guiding them.
The Germans were a dictatorship then. Remember Hitler the dictator?
Let me ask you....What is your solution to lasting peace, if it's not democracy.
Ever seen a major democracy attack each other?
Yes. And that major European powers haven't done it in the last 70 years is rather more involved than them simply being democratic countries.
Ever seen a major democracy attack each other?
Yes.
Name the countries.
The Germans were a dictatorship then. Remember Hitler the dictator?
So? Vast numbers still supported him. Many willingly did the most appalling things. Like I said, it doesn't require religion for people to revert to their basest instincts.
Let me ask you....What is your solution to lasting peace, if it's not democracy.
Evolution? Though that process looks like it has probably been stunted by the modern age. Genetics? As long as people are as they are now, there will never be peace. History demonstrates that. It is who we are.
Name the countries.
Ecuador and Peru. The Balkan nations were all democracies. Turkey's invasion of Cyprus.
Name the countries.
Ecuador and Peru. The Balkan nations were all democracies. Turkey's invasion of Cyprus.
LOL. They are not major democracies.
Let me ask you....What is your solution to lasting peace, if it's not democracy.
Evolution? Though that process looks like it has probably been stunted by the modern age. Genetics? As long as people are as they are now, there will never be peace. History demonstrates that. It is who we are.
Ha ha ha. What sense does that make? I don't believe you are an atheist. You are a Muslim defending your faith at all costs.
any and all religious texts can be misused by people who want to manipulate others to do their biding.
Some are much much easier to use to incite violence than others.
To declare that all religious texts are somehow the same is willful ignorance.
But if it makes you feel better by reinforcing your prejudice, nothing anyone says is going to shake that good-feeling from clouding your thoughts.
me ask you....What is your solution to lasting peace, if it's not democracy
In fairness, some people have proven time and again that they are not suited to live in a democracy; trying to make them democratic was a stupid plan started by bush and continued by Obama and Clinton to appease Saudi Arabia.
Working with Russians can't possibly be worse
« First « Previous Comments 139 - 178 of 258 Next » Last » Search these comments
His Political Islam bias comes out, taking advantage of his last few weeks to order the US Representative to abstain on a UNSC resolution telling Israel what it should do on the land the previous owners, the Egyptians and Jordanians, don't want back.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/un-demands-end-israeli-settlements-us-abstains-193027638.html
Congrats, Democrats.
Meanwhile, Netanyahu looks forward to the incoming Boss:
Donald Trump won't throw Israel to the Muslim Dogs.