3
0

Why liberals are emoting, fact challenged nincompoops


 invite response                
2017 Feb 6, 10:57am   8,149 views  42 comments

by Blurtman   ➕follow (2)   💰tip   ignore  

WA state's AG Bob "that's not a hairpiece" Ferguson on why Trump's immigration EO is wrong:

"“One cannot favor one religion over another.."

The Lautenberg Immigration Amendment, backed by Libruls:

"Under a program established by the U.S. State Department and negotiated with the government of Austria, members of certain Iranian non-Muslim religious minority groups are eligible to receive visas to travel to Austria, where they can be safe while the U.S. government processes their applications for refugee resettlement. This arrangement is a lifeline for Iranian religious minorities, since the United States has no embassy in Iran, and cannot interview applicants there."

https://www.hias.org/sites/default/files/lautenberg_amendment_backgrounder.pdf

#Hypocrite

« First        Comments 41 - 42 of 42        Search these comments

41   MisdemeanorRebel   2017 Feb 7, 9:56am  

This seems to hand unequivocal authority to the executive branch to determine who it may admit to the United States. However, another section of the law clearly bans discrimination against certain classes. Section 202(a)(1)(A) of the INA states that except in cases specified by Congress in section 101(a)(27):

…no person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person’s race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence.

While section 212 grants the president a general power to exclude certain immigrants, section 202 limits this power. Note that this section does not prevent discrimination based on religious affiliation, political belief, or ideology, but Trump’s new policy would run afoul of at least one if not all three of those last three restrictions—nationality, place of birth, or place of residence—depending on how it was applied. “Place” of birth is actually a broader restriction than nationality, meaning that even if Trump’s ban applied to subnational or regional levels, it would still be illegal.



https://www.cato.org/blog/trumps-presidential-ban-immigration-certain-countries-illegal

Holy shit, if a Court finds this valid a President won't even be able to ban foreign nationals who came from a particularly troubled province of another state, like Eastern Syria where ISIS rules.

Unprecedented tearing away of an ancient and frequently used tool of Diplomacy and Security and the concept of a Nation State. Neoliberal Globalist Extremism.

« First        Comments 41 - 42 of 42        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste