patrick.net

Rin, is that you?

Virtually the same thing was said by Thomas Jefferson: "Jefferson opposed miscegenation for a number of reasons, but one was his preference for the physical traits of Whites. He wrote of their “flowing hair” and their “more elegant symmetry of form,” but emphasized the importance of color itself

“Are not the fine mixtures of red and white, the expressions of every passion by greater or less suffusions of colour in the one [whites], preferable to that eternal monotony, which reigns in the countenances, that immovable veil of black, which covers all the emotions of the other race?”

James Madison agreed with Jefferson that the only solution to the race problem was to free the slaves and expel them: “To be consistent with existing and probably unalterable prejudices in the U.S. freed blacks ought to be permanently removed beyond the region occupied by or allotted to a White population.” He proposed that the federal government buy up the entire slave population and transport it overseas. After two terms in office, he served as chief executive of the American Colonization Society, which was established to repatriate Blacks.

Liberia was an interesting experiment, but not very many American blacks went:

In 1822, the American Colonization Society began sending African-American volunteers to the Pepper Coast to establish a colony for freed African-Americans. By 1867, the ACS (and state-related chapters) had assisted in the migration of more than 13,000 African Americans to Liberia.[17] These free African-Americans and their descendants married within their community and came to identify as Americo-Liberians. Many were of mixed race and educated in American culture; they did not identify with the indigenous natives of the tribes they encountered. They intermarried largely within the colonial community, developing an ethnic group that had a cultural tradition infused with American notions of political republicanism and Protestant Christianity.[18]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberia

I'm white and black women hit on me ALL THE TIME, and have since college.

It annoys the shit out of my wife, annoyed my past girlfriends, and has been a running joke at many places I've worked at.

I am a mixed-ethnicity Caucasian of superior intellect, and am clean and well-groomed (no beard'or facial hair, short hair, well-dressed), but do not have a clue what it is that so many black women find so attractive about me that they openly hit on me in front of my current wife, past girlfriends...

...Maybe it's my HUGE DONG (it's about 9 1/2", which is larger than the Asian,'Caucasian and even black average), but if so, how can they tell that I have a massive white python when I have clothes on?

BLACK HONEYS WANT THIS WHITE MEAT.

nobaloney says, "Virtually the same thing was said by Thomas Jefferson". Yes, but he most probably had a slew of mixed race children with Sally Hemings. Also most African-Americans have some European DNA. Sex is sex and what is available is attractive. Personally, in my miss spent youth I liked all types of women, well at least ones that had a pulse.

Black Chicks love White Guys - because it's a big status symbol.

However, a huge number of them hate Black Guys dating White or Asian girls more than anything. More so and with more passion than White Supremacists.

I've seen black girls go up to a mixed couple and berate the Black guy as a race traitor IRL.

www.pJIAXMr0Cfc

When I was in was in grad school at the U. of Washington I went out with a black- Blackfoot woman. We were walking down University Way (a major student thoroughfare) and two skinheads stepped directly in my path. I had just left the military and months of intense martial arts/weight training and was in the best fighting condition of my life. I moved into close physical proximity (Jeet Kune Do fighting range) where I could literally feel their body movements and invading their 'personal' space. We had a short stare-down before they lost nerve and backed off making some comment. Left me with a pleasant memory for my old age (now a days) and physically sore when it impressed my date so much she decided a needed a good physical workout. I say women are all the same color inside and enjoy your youth. Hell, I will go a step further and say if men are your thing- enjoy that. It is nobodies business but you and your partner's. Oh I never slept with married women, residue of Catholic childhood I suppose.
BTW some women of each race age gracefully and some fall apart pretty early. Ben Franklin did not mind older women.

Black women don't hit on me, they just hit me.

Crushin' holes & TCB is my family motto (it's on our family crest).

alice says

I am attracted physically to the white skin and features, it just looks clean and sexually arrousing..

Sexual exaggeration makes people seek those who look more like they do, and their ancestors do. Think about it. If your ancestors found red hair attractive, they would mate with people with red hair and pass on both the genes for red hair and the genes for preferring red hair mates.

Nominating alice for the user who lurks the most.

joined 07 Feb 2010
posted 1 thread, 11 comments in seven years.

CIC, please follow her example.

Macropodia says

Rin, is that you?

As expected, one of my trolls would attempt to pin the race/color baiting on me, to make my honest postings on only fucking hoes instead of relationships, as some form of racism/bigotry.

Once again, Soft Shell Crab ... Fuck You!

My only mention of race/ethnicity was in mentioning that I liked to titty fuck, Korean hoes with gigantic breast implants.

Now, it could just of well have been any other woman of some other racial/ethnic group, with the enhanced mammaries, which would have created the same effect.

Let me help corner the point ... it's the cock which is happy!

Do you get a fortune cookie with that tit fuck? Oops, this isn't the politically incorrect thread.

Ceffer says

Do you get a fortune cookie with that tit fuck? Oops, this isn't the politically incorrect thread.

Wrong nationality, those are ABCs (American Born Chinese). Sorry, no fortune cookie with the Bulgogi.

Ceffer says

Oops, this isn't the politically incorrect thread.

@Ceffer Don't worry, they are all politically incorrect threads!

You can't shit on other users, but aside from that, anything goes.

We're Patrick's digital tadpoles.

May you all grow up into beautiful toads!

Patrick, I still think we should be able to engage in ad hominem attacks against other members, you cuck (not ad hominem, because sarcastic irony, or is it?...).

We either have free speech, or not. It's one of the few black and white areas in life.

The problem with unlimited personal insults on the front page is that it chills the conversation, and many reasonable people on both sides simply leave. No one wants to join if their point is going to be ignored and they are going to be personally attacked.

I'm not endorsing ad hominem attacks, and in fact, generally find them counterproductive with respect to those launching them.

I still believe they serve many purposes in terms of public discourse, as they allow others observing the debate to ascertain information about the strengths/weaknesses of peoples' arguments, as well as the character (and possible desperation and intellectual limitations) of the person making such ad hominem attacks.

It's one thing to prohibit ad hominem attacks against other members (thunderdome threads excluded), but to not allow them as the debate within threads develops does a disservice to the nature and quality of the debate (as lack of quality in certain peoples' arguments, when they engage in ad hominem attacks, is actually quite revealing).

When I took constitutional law in college, the excellent Jewish professor I had spent quite a bit of time making the case that the Jewish ACLU attorney who sued Skokie, Illinois, over its refusal to allow Nazis a permit to march and express vitriolic speech (a case that the ACLU won on behalf of the Nazi group and against the city, forcing Skokie to issue a permit), did a great job in enforcing the RIGHTS under the 1st Amendment, the cause of unfettered discourse, and in fact, forcing Skokie to allow the fringe Nazi group to march and chant ridiculous things actually hurt their cause and painted them in an extremely embarrassing light, and also helped to specifically identify radical nutcases who otherwise may have not revealed themselves in such a public forum.

So are you saying that ad hominem attacks help debate by exposing those who do that as lacking substantial arguments?

Maybe that's fine once or twice, but if the attacks are all day every day, then it seems like it's rapidly a large net negative.

rando says

So are you saying that ad hominem attacks help debate by exposing those who do that as lacking substantial arguments?

An ad hominem attack doesn't make a counterargument, but once you've made all the necessary counterarguments, there's still a purpose to calling the village idiot a moron. You don't want others to be encouraged to take up the role.