« First « Previous Comments 42 - 44 of 44 Search these comments
Wiretap has a very specific legal meaning.
Wiretaps may have a legal meaning stemming from a bygone era. That doesnt change the fact that wire taps are not how monitoring is done by our government.
BUGS aren't used these days. Neither are wires tapped. Those are colloquialisms for monitoring activities.
Buzzt wrong.
bugs are most certainly used, now more than ever. google sweeping for bugs and see how many thousands of hits there are for bug sweeping devices.
Sure, a jealous husband may use a bug.
The government doesn't need or use that shit anymore. Your phone, computer, and TV are all "bugged" already. Some judge rubber stamps an order, and voila, all your conversations are available to them.
You've seen this fisa order? You are saying it specifically names trump tower and trumps lines? Can you post it for us? That would be great, thanks.
Not much besides hearsay has been released to the public. The wiretaps/investigations have been referenced with most details still unknown... but i think you know that. Always the troll i suppose
Are you a spy Rash? Otherwise, lets all admit that we dont know most of the relevant facts in this case.
You seem to know enough to assert that it's true what Trump said and fake news about Russia...
CBOEtrader says
What am I missing? For the record, I openly ASK for people to tell me what I'm missing in my posts. I would never pretend to know all the facts.
Ha. You've been claiming all along that Russia is fake news and what Trump claims is fact. You don't even seem to realise that none of the reports state Trump and his aides were wiretapped - they say Russians were targeted. You can't even get that basic piece of reporting in order FFS.
The obvious point is that we don't know all the facts yet, so you can't make definitive claims. You, however, are doing just that.
We've already had one. No evidence of Trump or any american collaborating with russia was found. Paul Ryan was very clear on this.
That wasn't what I asked, was it?
« First « Previous Comments 42 - 44 of 44 Search these comments
www.youtube.com/embed/UoUdGI5LF80