patrick.net

just any guy says

- Our population is fatter, unhealthier, larger and more diverse than most every other developed nation, so you can't compare healthcare administration costs as apples to apples.

Weight is a part of health care. A lot of people in the US think that doctors will just fix them if they get sick and that getting sick is just a genetic crap shoot. They don't realize that their own lifestyle will have a tremendous impact on how healthy they are. They also don't realize that doctors can't really 'fix' heart disease, cancer, etc. With heart disease, they can save your life if you are lucky. But they cannot reverse the disease. With Cancer, they can prolong your life with some of the less aggressive types. But the more aggressive ones will probably just kill you 'pretty quickly' regardless of what a doctor does.

Also, with regard to Obesity, 34% of Americans were obese in 2014. This is compared to 28-29% of people in the UK, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, and Mexico. That's not a huge difference - pun intended.

It's hard to believe that diversity of genetic backgrounds complicates the work of doctors all that much. Diversity of genetic material probably helps an individual, but I may be wrong on that. Correct me if you know something about that.

YesYNot says

But if this was the main issue

I never said it was the main issue. Healthcare is a very complex issue to solve with numerous factors to consider. Illegal immigrants using our healthcare system without paying for services is a problem...period.

I know your ideology says otherwise, but it's mistaken. I have first-hand experience with this.

It's hopeless. People muddle the issue with irrelevant details instead of looking at the big pucture.

How can removing the middle man, streamlining and simplifying the administration, removing the for-profit element, improving preventive care, and regulating services and costs does not make health care better and more affordable?

http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/31/8/1803.full.pdf+html

Or how about this? US compared to EU countries is an apples to oranges comparison. You are literally comparing white people with healthy lifestyles to obese black people. Im assuming facts are acceptable since this is thunderdome.

FP says

It's hopeless. People muddle the issue with irrelevant details instead of looking at the big pucture.

How can removing the middle man, streamlining and simplifying the administration, removing the for-profit element, improving preventive care, and regulating services and costs does not make health care better and more affordable?

A monkey could take a dump on our current system and it would be more affordable.

just any guy says

I know your ideology says otherwise, but it's mistaken. I have first-hand experience with this.

Having seen a few illegals going to the ER does not mean you know how significant a burden on the system they are.

FP says

Having seen a few illegals going to the ER does not mean you know how significant a burden on the system they are.

You're wrong. Having worked as an executive in the health plan for one of the largest health systems in the nation, I know what the burden was based on actual payor data as well as interacting with hospitals and physicians in 6 different states. Don't tell me my business.

CBOEtrader says

http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/31/8/1803.full.pdf+html

Or how about this? US compared to EU countries is an apples to oranges comparison. You are literally comparing white people with healthy lifestyles to obese black people. Im assuming facts are acceptable since this is thunderdome.

Why did you ignore the hispanics? They are as many as the blacks?

We have a problem of cultural choices. We choose to eat too many ho-ho's and shoot each other.

FP says

It's hopeless. People muddle the issue with irrelevant details instead of looking at the big pucture.

How can removing the middle man, streamlining and simplifying the administration, removing the for-profit element, improving preventive care, and regulating services and costs does not make health care better and more affordable?

In the words of Trump, healthcare is A LOT hard to solve than you think. If it were as trivial as you make it out to be, it would've been solved by now.

just any guy says

FP says

Having seen a few illegals going to the ER does not mean you know how significant a burden on the system they are.

You're wrong. Having worked as an executive in the health plan for one of the largest health systems in the nation, I know what the burden was based on actual payor data as well as interacting with hospitals and physicians in 6 different states. Don't tell me my business.

Give me the numbers then, don't just blablabla me.

FP says

just any guy says

FP says

Having seen a few illegals going to the ER does not mean you know how significant a burden on the system they are.

You're wrong. Having worked as an executive in the health plan for one of the largest health systems in the nation, I know what the burden was based on actual payor data as well as interacting with hospitals and physicians in 6 different states. Don't tell me my business.

Give me the numbers then, don't just blablabla me.

Roughly 15% of the uninsured were illegal immigrants. It was obviously worse in CA (upward of 25%) vs other states, but consider that a rough average. It's not just about the cost, but it's also about the experience that other legal and/or insured patients go through as it pertains to wait times.

FP says

Why did you ignore the hispanics? They are as many as the blacks?

Stats suggest the hispanic population does not harbor the same cultural plague as our black communities, and are therefore not as noteworthy.

FP says

Give me the numbers then, don't just blablabla me.

Gave you the numbers. Now are you just gonna blablabla me back like you have been?

Let me also add that the uninsured tend to use the ER because they have to be admitted. The ER, on average, costs 5x that of a normal doctor visit.

just any guy says

Gave you the numbers. Now are you just gonna blablabla me back like you have been?

Now I'm going to tell you that the number you gave me is meaningless by itslef. The question was what burden are the illigas on the system. You tell me they are 15% of the uninsured. So if the uninsured are 150 people?

Try again Mr. executive. But this time think more before writing.

just any guy says

Let me also add that the uninsured tend to use the ER because they have to be admitted. The ER, on average, costs 5x that of a normal doctor visit.

That was a big driver that was expected to lost costs when the aca lowered the number of uninsured. Common sense tells you that the benefit is long term, while the cost is front loaded. That's too much nuance for a national debate though.

YesYNot says

just any guy says

Let me also add that the uninsured tend to use the ER because they have to be admitted. The ER, on average, costs 5x that of a normal doctor visit.

That was a big driver that was expected to lost costs when the aca lowered the number of uninsured. Common sense tells you that the benefit is long term, while the cost is front loaded. That's too much nuance for a national debate though.

Yep, I agreed with some of the things that ACA tried to do and its objectives. Healthcare is the hardest thing for our country to figure out. I give it to Obama for trying.

FP says

just any guy says

Gave you the numbers. Now are you just gonna blablabla me back like you have been?

Now I'm going to tell you that the number you gave me is meaningless by itslef. The question was what burden are the illigas on the system. You tell me they are 15% of the uninsured. So if the uninsured are 150 people?

Try again Mr. executive. But this time think more before writing.

Done with you bro. You give back nothing in return except insecurity and animosity for sound logic that shakes your ideology. It's like debating a religious zealot...your mind is made up.

just any guy says

You give back nothing in return except insecurity and animosity for sound logic that shakes your ideology.

What a fucking idiot. I just exposed your lack of logic.

CBOEtrader says

Stats suggest the hispanic population does not harbor the same cultural plague as our black communities, and are therefore not as noteworthy.

I though you posted that figure to show that the average American longevity is lowered because the blacks. But it also shows that the hispanics compensate for the blacks.

marcus says

Good incomes for services provided have a place in health care, but not the profit motive to the degree it does.

If it's business, the only motivation is profit. Everything else is secondary.

FP says

CBOEtrader says

Stats suggest the hispanic population does not harbor the same cultural plague as our black communities, and are therefore not as noteworthy.

I though you posted that figure to show that the average American longevity is lowered because the blacks. But it also shows that the hispanics compensate for the blacks.

No, the hispanics show how our cultural decisions fail us. Hispanics in the US live longer despite being poor and not having the best healthcare BECAUSE they eat healthier than the average american white person. Fruits, veggies, rice, beans, and chicken.

This is still a story about personal decisions.

just any guy says

So, I see this as a CAREFUL balance of free market and gov't intervention. If we lose too much free market, we lose innovation and increase gov't corruption and inefficiency. If we allow too much free market, we get outrageous pricing and certain portions of the population left out to die.

Makes a lot of sense. I believe single payer, administered and regulated well could accomplish this. IT already does for the senior that use most of the health care services already.

Ironman says

So you really think Medicare is administered and regulated well and is very cost efficient?

It's more cost efficient than private insurance is.

joeyjojojunior says

Ironman says

So you really think Medicare is administered and regulated well and is very cost efficient?

It's more cost efficient than private insurance is.

This is an interesting analysis because comparing administrative overhead of Medicare vs private health plans is apples and oranges. For example with integrated health systems, they handle most of the claims processing and adjudication overhead...not Medicare or Medicaid. So, it is hard to compare.

If you ask independent providers who is easier to work with, most will likely say private insurers because the paperwork and guidelines for Medicare is outrageous. From what I've seen, this is a symptom of how government operates...with far too much bureaucracy and overhead.

Look at auto insurers. If we have private companies in a commodity business like insurance competing against each other, a huge portion of their success will be derived from automation and process improvement. In contrast, the government has no motivation to streamline administrative processes as evidenced by how Medicare/Medicaid is today because they know they'll get funding from the taxpayer and not go out of business. Government, by nature, breeds corruption because it's more driven by politics, getting reelected, and getting the biggest budgets possible, so that's why I'm against single payer. No competition.

FortWayne says

If it's business, the only motivation is profit. Everything else is secondary.

...including lives, which is why capitalism does not work for health care.

just any guy says

In contrast, the government has no motivation to streamline administrative processes as evidenced by how Medicare/Medicaid is today because they know they'll get funding from the taxpayer and not go out of business

Other countries manage.

HEalth Care costs are so high now, that if we implemented single payer, the administrators would have no choice but to figure out how to streamline the processes and also use their negotiating power to hold prices and costs down.

Dan8267 says

FortWayne says

If it's business, the only motivation is profit. Everything else is secondary.

...including lives, which is why capitalism does not work for health care.

Capitalism works fine, if it wasn't for capitalism we'd be all dying off left and right from our unhealthy lifestyle choices.

FortWayne says

Capitalism works fine, if it wasn't for capitalism we'd be all dying off left and right from our unhealthy lifestyle choices.

If it wasn't for the socialistic military we'd all be speaking German now.

Capitalism works great as long as certain conditions are met, one of which is elastic demand. Unfortunately, healthcare demand is highly inelastic. Which is why healthcare costs can rise at such high rates year after year.

FortWayne says

Capitalism works fine, if it wasn't for capitalism we'd be all dying off left and right from our unhealthy lifestyle choices.

www.youtube.com/embed/zkYCf4h5XgE

Dan8267 says

FortWayne says

Capitalism works fine, if it wasn't for capitalism we'd be all dying off left and right from our unhealthy lifestyle choices.

www.youtube.com/embed/zkYCf4h5XgE

Since michael Moore's film sicko was released we've implemented massive extra government intervention to fix healthcare. How's that worked?

How much longer will you pretend government intervention in healthcare isn't the problem?

https://mises.org/blog/how-government-regulations-made-healthcare-so-expensive

Looks to me like the US doesn't have enough government in healthcare. More government seems to lead to lower costs.

joeyjojojunior says

Looks to me like the US doesn't have enough government in healthcare. More government seems to lead to lower costs.

Lol, and you call this a free market?

CBOEtrader says

Lol, and you call this a free market?

No, I don't believe I did. What I said was that the lowest cost healthcare systems are LESS market oriented than the US system. So, it would appear that less free market leads to lower costs.

CBOEtrader says

Since michael Moore's film sicko was released we've implemented massive extra government intervention to fix healthcare. How's that worked?

The ACA is a massive extra government intervention? I think not. It's the Republican plan from the 1990s. It does not have
- single payer
- and end to private insurance
- divorcing employment from health insurance
- nationalization of insurance
- nationalization of health care

The ACA is the old system with lipstick. If anything it was a give away to big private insurance companies because of the individual mandate.

joeyjojojunior says

More government seems to lead to lower costs.

This has been proven time and time again.

joeyjojojunior says

What I said was that the lowest cost healthcare systems are LESS market oriented than the US system.

Your chart contradicts this assertion.

CBOEtrader says

Your chart contradicts this assertion.

Care to elaborate?

Here's an interesting article regarding single payer and healthcare in general. I'm intrigued by the idea of single payer for basic healthcare. However, Medicare is single payer for the elderly, and it's really expensive and onerous. I believe the problem is that Medicare provides too much access to expensive treatment options, so the costs get out of control. Again, if we went with Medicare for all, it would need to be not-cutting-edge healthcare and then people can buy private insurance for more advanced coverage.

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/855271