« First « Previous Comments 254 - 293 of 503 Next » Last » Search these comments
No, you just don't know anything.
How can I respond to such a strong argument. You win.
Religion and science are not opposite Strategist. They compliment each other.
That's a load of crap. Science is based on evidence. Religion is based on faith, the rejection of evidence. The are antithetical world views.
Wisdom of human kind is written into the bible. Science doesn't teach that, and it's the most important lesson.
That i agree.
As far as evolution / creationism... evolution doesn't have any proof of how everything was made. Big bang theory doesn't work, because something can't be created out of nothing, it conflicts with science.
Science has no idea how everything was made. One day it might. Religion, however, has no idea of how everything was made either, and never will.
Just remember, every time ISIS kills somebody, you can thank George W. Bush for its rise to power. This is the consequence of his illegal war. It left a power vacuum that ISIS filled.
Shouldn't you be asking that to the violent followers of Islam?
Here everybody is asking them. I am asking the questions that nobody is asking. That what smart people do. We leave the easy stuff to the mediocre.
By the way the Bible preaches creationism, not evolution. To claim Catholics believe in evolution is rather silly.
Good grief.
"Early contributions to the development of evolutionary theory were made by Catholic scientists such as Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and the Augustinian monk Gregor Mendel. For nearly a century, the papacy offered no authoritative pronouncement on Darwin's theories. In the 1950 encyclical Humani generis, Pope Pius XII confirmed that there is no intrinsic conflict between Christianity and the theory of evolution,"
"Catholic schools in the United States and other countries teach evolution as part of their science curriculum."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_and_the_Catholic_Church
Again - do you guys really have no clue about this stuff? Is your understanding of Christianity (and Judaism) really this superficial?
Wisdom of human kind is written into the bible.
Some wisdom and a lot of nonsense. I learned more wisdom about human kind from the novels of, say, Honoré de Balzac.
I am asking the questions that nobody is asking. That what smart people do. We leave the easy stuff to the mediocre.
We already have the answers to the questions you keep asking. That is why nobody else is asking them. If you were really smart, you would have got that by now.
Just remember, every time ISIS kills somebody, you can thank George W. Bush for its rise to power. This is the consequence of his illegal war. It left a power vacuum that ISIS filled.
Which Obama watched it rise to power, while he played golf.
Science has no idea how everything was made. One day it might. Religion, however, has no idea of how everything was made either, and never will.
I think you are putting too much faith in science on this one :)
By the way the Bible preaches creationism, not evolution. To claim Catholics believe in evolution is rather silly.
Good grief.
"Early contributions to the development of evolutionary theory were made by Catholic scientists such as Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and the Augustinian monk Gregor Mendel. For nearly a century, the papacy offered no authoritative pronouncement on Darwin's theories. In the 1950 encyclical Humani generis, Pope Pius XII confirmed that there is no intrinsic conflict between Christianity and the theory of evolution,"
"Catholic schools in the United States and other countries teach evolution as part of their science curriculum."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_and_the_Catholic_ChurchAgain - do you guys really have no clue about ...
The earth is 6,000 years old as per the Bible. You cannot believe in a 6,000 year old earth and evolution at the same time.
Which Obama watched it rise to power, while he played golf.
Bush is still far worse on this one because he created the problem.
I think you are putting too much faith in science on this one
Faith in science, the type of oxymoronic thinking that dominates religion. Science works empirically. Planes fly. Medications work. We walked on the moon. You are writing stuff on a world-wide network of electronic computing devices. Science is not based on faith. It's based on results.
Science has no idea how everything was made. One day it might. Religion, however, has no idea of how everything was made either, and never will.
I think you are putting too much faith in science on this one :)
No. I'm admitting science does not know everything. We have barely scratched the surface of science.
Aren't you putting too much faith in a religion that claims to know everything, even though it has been repeatedly proven wrong?
The earth is 6,000 years old as per the Bible. You cannot believe in a 6,000 year old earth and evolution at the same time.
Yet devout Catholics and Jews (along with other Christian denominations like Lutherans, Episcopalians and Protestants) have managed to believe (and even teach) evolution for years.
How does that work?
Catholic catechism includes Man's reason and logic as part of it's dogma. Catholic dogma "evolves" as Man's understanding of the universe advances. Judaism is the same way. That is why there are so many Catholic and Jewish scientists and doctors - there is no conflict. It is also why Christianity and Judaism have been so compatible and successful under secular government as they also believe in pluralism. It is also why Judaism has outlasted virtually every other civilization and ideology on the planet despite massive historic persecution.
Islam is totally different in that it does not accept man's reason and logic or secular rule - hence the reason why it is so fucked up and violent.
I would think these things were obviously apparent.
Yet devout Catholics and Jews (along with other Christian denominations like Lutherans, Episcopalians and Protestants) have managed to believe (and even teach) evolution for years.
How does that work?
by way of brain damage
At times I sure do, if we all agreed there would never be a debate.
I do however believe that for America to stay a moral nation we have to be a Christian nation. Otherwise morality will disappear or worse Muslim craziness will take over.
Science has no idea how everything was made. One day it might. Religion, however, has no idea of how everything was made either, and never will.
I think you are putting too much faith in science on this one :)
No. I'm admitting science does not know everything. We have barely scratched the surface of science.
Aren't you putting too much faith in a religion that claims to know everything, even though it has been repeatedly proven wrong?
That was pretty damn good.
It's not Islamophobia if Muslims really are threatening to kill you.
And Muslims are threatening to kill you if you use your rights.
Everyone should be very afraid of Islam.
Islam hates you. Islam hates all non-Muslims. It's in the Koran. It's on every page of the Koran.
The choice is freedom, or Islam.
Back to the Thread Subject for a minute.
Father of Salman Abedi claims his son is innocent. "We" don't do these kinds of thing. Meanwhile, reports that Abedi's younger brother has been arrested in Libya for ties to ISIS. Ramadan Abedi told reporters in Tripoli, Libya, his son sounded 'normal' when he spoke to him five days ago.
Earlier Picture
Hasem Ramadan, the younger brother also pictured above, picked up by Libyan Authorities:
Life comes at your fast: Father now under arrest by Libyan Counter-Terrorism force. And both brothers in Tripoli
http://metro.co.uk/2017/05/24/manchester-suicide-bombers-father-ramadan-abedi-arrested-in-libya-6659810/
Expected: Andy Burnham, Manchester Mayor, claims Salman not a Muslim, despite his attendance at Mosque and public recital of Koran Quotes
The mayor of Manchester, England, has declared that the Muslim terrorist responsible for Monday’s attack at Manchester Arena — which killed 22 people and wounded approximately 59 more — is “not a Muslim.â€
Mayor Andy Burnham’s decree contradicts the overwhelming evidence that suicide-terrorist Salman Abedi was a devout Muslim and an active member of his mosque in Britain.
On Wednesday, the mayor appeared on Britain's LBC talk program to make his case.
“The message that I would want to get over — and this is how the vast majority of people feel — this man was a terrorist, not a Muslim,†Burnham said. “The worst thing that can happen is that people use this to blame an entire community, the Muslim community.â€
...
Abedi was a student of the Quran, according to The New York Times, and was described by neighbors as “devout.†Moreover, his family was heavily involved in the Islamic community in Manchester. The alleged terrorist frequently attended the city’s Didsbury Mosque, and his father sometimes issued the call to prayer there.
https://www.conservativereview.com/articles/manchester-mayor-muslim-terrorist-not-a-muslim
Remember, it's far more important to stop hurt feelz among Muslims than to focus on the 22 Children Murdered.
this man was a terrorist, not a Muslim
He was a terrorist because we was a Muslim.
Not only that, it's because he was a devout Muslim doing exactly what Islam teaches.
Too obvious for words, really.
Like clockwork Dan trots out the red herring of mustaches being more important characteristics than ideas.
There is nothing about disbelieving in supernatural sky daddies that makes people commit genocide, wage war, or burn gays and witches at the stake. However, there is a great deal about religion that makes people do those things. When people hold up "god hates fags" signs, sorry bro, but that does have something inherently to do with their religion. When Muslims say death to the infidels, religion is the cause. And it's not just a few people. The majority of people in the past 10,000 years have been motivated to evil causes either committing vile acts themselves or enabling others directly due to religion. History supports my beliefs and contradicts yours.
And again, what the flying fuck is the upside of the delusion you call a religion?
You are wrong again. When a person says there is no God, they are implying there is no God to which they are accountable. Therefore there is no reason to fear comitting genocide, waging selfish wars, burning gays/witches at the stake or any number of attrocities, because there is no higher authority to hold you accountable for your wrongdoing. On the other hand, someone who truly fears God would not deliberately and habitually do evil because they would know that God will not let their evil go unpunished. The "god hates fags" crowd might be religious, but they are not God fearing. Furthermore, Jesus never stood by the side of the road holding hate signs, and never told his people to do so either. The founder of Islam on the other hand did murder, rape and enslave, and taught his followers to do the same. There is no upside of religion. That is not my argument. But there is an upside to fearing God, because when you fear God you begin to have wisdom.
https://www.gotquestions.org/fear-Lord-beginning-wisdom.html
There is plenty of violence and hate in this world that has nothing to do with religion.
There is plenty of violence in this world not caused by North Korea having nukes and ICBMs. That does not imply that it's OK for North Korea to have nukes and ICBMs. Is logic really that hard?
I am not in favor of Kimfuck having nuclear weapons, but North Korea is a nation of 25 million people. So as a liberal how would you strong arm/prevent Kimfuck from having nukes and ICBMs without risking the lives of 25 million North Koreans and the millions of people on his boarders? But more to the point, what is the source of violence and hate Dan? Answer that and you will be demonstrating wisdom.
You are wrong again. When a person says there is no God, they are implying there is no God to which they are accountable.
Hello?Lets ask the person who says "there is no God" like me to clarify. When I say there is no God, I mean there is no God. That he does not exist, never did and never will. That the belief in God is the world's greatest myth. God, Devil, tooth fairy, Santa claus, Bogey Man, all have one thing in common......they do not exist.
Got it?
But more to the point, what is the source of violence and hate Dan? Answer that and you will be demonstrating wisdom.
Religion and God is the source of virtually all violence.
Blind beliefs, what religions are about, predispose towards tribalism, fanaticism, and enable manipulation. The degree to which they are able to influence people depend on the circumstances - education of the population, economic and political situation, etc. However, given the "right" conditions, they incite and justify horrible acts.
Right now, a large part of the muslim world lives in such conditions - lack of education, poverty, overpopulation, fail states, foreign interventions, aggressions and occupations. It is therefore not surprising that right now muslims are the perpetrators of horrific acts incited by religion. However, if we look into the not too distant past, there are plenty of instances of other religious groups conducting atrocities. So the specifics of the muslim religion alone cannot explain the terrorist acts today.
If people adhering to other religions are put into similar circumstances (including educational lever, religiousness, etc), I expect ...
Ah the nature vs. nuture argument. Sorry FP, your view is overly simplistic and doesn't pass the sniff test. As others have pointed out, Islamic terrorists come from diverse socieoconomic backgrounds. But they all have one thing in common, they believe the lies of Islam. Jesus on the other hand taught his followers to be happy with food and clothing, and to turn the other cheek when they are mistreated.
That is not to say that Islamic religion is the only source of lies. However, it is a source of lies that is motivating a rapidly growing number of cowards to attack soft targets around the world. Islam is the complete opposite of freedom, Islam is slavery.
If religion is man made as you say therefore man is the source of all violence, not religion. That's just following your logic.
But more to the point, what is the source of violence and hate Dan? Answer that and you will be demonstrating wisdom.
Religion and God is the source of virtually all violence.
You are wrong again. When a person says there is no God, they are implying there is no God to which they are accountable.
Hello?Lets ask the person who says "there is no God" like me to clarify. When I say there is no God, I mean there is no God. That he does not exist, never did and never will. That the belief in God is the world's greatest myth. God, Devil, tooth fairy, Santa claus, Bogey Man, all have one thing in common......they do not exist.
Got it?
When you say there is no God, you are not only denying His existence, you are also denying His word. But correct me if I am wrong. Are you changing your stripes Stragegist? Am I wrong in assuming you don't believe in accountability to God for your sins?
If religion is man made as you say therefore man is the source of all violence, not religion. That's just following your logic.
Basically yes.
Voltaire....."Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Voltaire Quotes - BrainyQuote
https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/v/voltaire.html
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit ...
When you say there is no God, you are not only denying His existence, you are also denying His word. But correct me if I am wrong. Are you changing your stripes Stragegist? Am I wrong in assuming you don't believe in accountability to God for your sins?
If i don't believe in God, I cannot believe in accountability to the nonexistent character you call God.
I think there can be morality without God. You just have to see that other people suffer like you yourself do, that they are really very similar to you.
How do you suppose the Jews outlived virtually every civilization despite massive persecution and thrived producing massive wealth and contributions to science, literature, culture, economics.........at a much higher per capita than any civilization on earth? Where did the Hittites go? Babylonians? Minoans? Romans? Assyrians? Incas? Aztecs? Egyptians? The Jews outlasted them all!
Provided it was not supernatural forces by God or a master plan protecting the Jews for thousands of years. Can't one argue that it was the Jewish religious belief system and lifestyle that has allowed them to outlast everyone else for thousands of years? So accepting the non-supernatural explanation - doesn't that clearly point out that not all religions are the same and that some religious belief (particularly the Jewish faith) is a major asset for some people?
How do you suppose the Jews outlived virtually every civilization despite massive persecution and thrived producing massive wealth and contributions to science, literature, culture, economics.........at a much higher per capita than any civilization on earth? Where did the Hittites go? Babylonians? Minoans? Romans? Assyrians? Incas? Aztecs? Egyptians? The Jews outlasted them all!
Provided it was not supernatural forces by God or a master plan protecting the Jews for thousands of years. Can't one argue that it was the Jewish religious belief system and lifestyle that has allowed them to outlast everyone else for thousands of years? So accepting the non-supernatural explanation - doesn't that clearly point out that not all religions are the same and that some religious belief (particularly the Jewish faith) is a major asset for some people?
New Poll Shows Atheism on Rise, With Jews Found to Be Least Religious
read more: http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/news/new-poll-shows-atheism-on-rise-with-jews-found-to-be-least-religious-1.459477
Don't know if this is some guy taking the piss, or actual Muslima.
Look closely at her Burka below:
I think there can be morality without God.
Of course. Morality is rooted in evolution. Animals exhibit traits of morality too.
I think there can be morality without God.
Of course. Morality is rooted in evolution. Animals exhibit traits of morality too.
Morality cannot be achieved with God/Religion. Just look at the morals in the holy books of the major religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Hinduism. They are sickening. They do not meet my moral standards.
I did not mention Islam, because it's a fucking cult.
Where did the Hittites go? Babylonians? Minoans? Romans? Assyrians? Incas? Aztecs? Egyptians? The Jews outlasted them all!
Not sure about the Hittites, but many of the others are still around in some religious form.
The Babylonians became Orthodox Christian and now call themselves Chaldean.
Minoans are Greek Orthodox now and not much different from other Greeks I think.
Romans became Italian. We're using the Latin alphabet right now, not dead. All Catholic churches are little remnant outposts of the Roman Empire, and the church is still run from Rome.
Assyrians are still a distinct group, also Orthodox Christian.
Incas are still there. 9 million people still speak Quechua. Dunno if they still have any native religion.
Aztecs were very Hispanified and Catholic, and so their distinct identity is gone.
The original Egyptians are now the Coptic Christians of Egypt, and have managed to hang on despite Islam's chipping away at them for a thousand years.
Maybe the Jews are some of the least changed people, but they are not exactly the same as in ancient times either.
It does seem to be true that having an exclusive ethnic religion helps preserve identity, as opposed to being Catholic or Muslim, which think of themselves as universal and not particular to any one group. Makes for less of a barrier to intermarriage and so starts to blur identities.
« First « Previous Comments 254 - 293 of 503 Next » Last » Search these comments
Explosion at concert:
http://abcnews.go.com/International/police-respond-reports-incident-manchester-arena/story?id=47569092
All Neoliberals and SJWs: