patrick.net

On a side note glad the usernames are back. Still miss my avatar though :(

WookieMan says

I'm sure this has been brought up before (today as a matter of fact, but not in a thoughtful way). Does anyone think there should at least be an hourly post limit (1 per hour or maybe even 1 every 3 hours - something along those lines) or even a daily limit per user? I just feel like a lot of shit gets thrown at the wall to see what sticks and 80% of it doesn't. There's a group of 4-5 users that on any given day can go ape shit posting pretty much dumpster fire material. 20% can be good or generate a debate, but it seems like a lot is just plain bad.

I know the tabs at the top can be used to sort the post differently, but I always go by the default I'm used to of active posts. It seems like it involves a lot of new posts as well that may not even have a comment on it. While I don't want to filter out new content/posts, sometimes one user can monopolize the entire homepage (depending on which tab you're in). Turns me off certain days when it's loaded with one users w...

I think patnet should be pay to play. You either pay to post after the first 3 posts per day, or you can ask people to donate to patnet on your behalf in order to post past your 3 post limit. I would also limit the number of comments you can make per thread to 3 per day to force people to choose their words wisely and not engage in ad hominem attacks. You can always pay more if you want to comment more than three per day (something like 10 cents per comment). I would also charge people for the right to ban people from your threads. $1 per day per person per thread. @Patrick this could be a money maker for you!!!

What problem are you solving here

errc says

What problem are you solving here

Not sure if you were talking to me or PeopleUnited

There are days I come here and the posts (not comments) are monopolized by one or two users upon arriving (comments on posts can get fucked up, but it's better). Yes there are some highly commented posts mixed in with the active tab, but 1-2 posters can fill up the home page for the most part along with those 2-3 highly commented posts (I view it by default using the active tab). When I see that I just leave immediately. Then there are days when more people are active and posting and I'm way more intrigued, not just 1 or 2 with what's essentially crap.

I guess I didn't want to call out users, but to make the point I'm going to have to. TPB, HEY YOU, Tovarich, etc. I guess it's mainly those three, but others get mixed in there from time to time as the site ebbs and flows. I guess my problem is their frequency of posts at times, along with the fact little actual legit commentary is included. It's basically post a link and hit google. Then do it again. And again. There are users here, whether I agree with them or not, that at least put their opinion out there when they post. Posting a link with no, little or incoherent commentary is just annoying at this point.

There are sometime interesting things they post of course, but a lot of the times it's just a flood of bull shit. 98% of people here are post at best once, maybe twice a day. So I guess that's why I'm suggesting a limit of some sort. I guess I appreciate better thought out posts instead of just dumping links here with some gibberish attached to it.

Cash flow issues from patrick.net
errc says

What problem are you solving here

If there is a post or comment on patnet,you're guaranteed it is not worth reading.

First, before someone else calls it out. My only other original post is hypocritical somewhat to the point I'm making. So there's that. But it was only 1 post.

That being said, below is an example of what I'm talking about. This is from the new tab, but certain days (less active I assume) my home page looks more like these screen shots. WTF? What is intriguing about this, really?

On a bad day there's maybe 1-2 others sprinkled in. On a good day, there's 7-8 good posts going. I'm just trying to suggest and/or figure out if there's a way to keep a good 7-8 good posts. I assume it requires some of the regulars posting more or getting more users. But it's hard to get new users when a lot of people are welcomed with the screen shots above, from 2-3 users posting what is essentially crap being flung at a wall.

Again, there's good stuff in there from time to time. So don't get too butt hurt about the critique.

@wookieMan

I agree there is too much noise and there are some obvious offenders.

I also think the ad hominem/uncivil behavior needs to have negative consequences and this too could be fixed by locking people out for three days after first offense, 30 days for second offense and etc...

The narrative is lowest common denominator all too often. The site needs more structure, more enforcement of civil discourse and I think some of the ideas you, i and others have suggested could change things for the better.

Thanks, I appreciate all the feedback!

Working every day on finishing the new version of the site in node.js. It actually looks identical to users, but it will make it much easier for me to alter features and make sub-sites with different parameters.

Anyone want their own site? If you have a username that is just letters and numbers (no spaces) you could possibly get a site like https://wookieman.patrick.net with your own policies for moderation, own CSS, etc.

Also planning on creating a totally anonymous site, to be called https://anon.patrick.net

PeopleUnited says

I also think the ad hominem/uncivil behavior needs to have negative consequences and this too could be fixed by locking people out for three days after first offense, 30 days for second offense and etc...

While I kind of agree, I generally filter the crap out. I'm not even remotely as active as others, but have been here a while reading even before my user was created, say 2009 roughly. I actually think the reverse would be more appropriate. If you flag someone for being uncivil/ad hom and it's not a legit violation, you get locked out for X time per violation.

I guess the way I look at it is if you have to attack me to make a point, go ahead. It speaks volumes about you (not you specifically PeopleUnited) and how much confidence you have in your argument. If I get proved I'm wrong so be it. I'm not going torched earth on anyone regardless of how I feel. I've been humbled before in real life situations doing things people do behind a keyboard and saying it in real life. You live, you learn. While it's all just anonymous text, from random people, I fear that it can creep into your daily life with how you treat others. So I'll pretty much always refrain form treating anyone here negatively when I can. I will point out things I think can use some improving though and if in that process some users get called out, so be it.

rando says

Anyone want their own site? If you have a username that is just letters and numbers (no spaces) you could possibly get a site like https://wookieman.patrick.net with your own policies for moderation, own CSS, etc.

I'm not ready for the big leagues yet. Just bring back my avatar ;)

WookieMan says

Just bring back my avatar

OK, done

This thread was started by a person who allows everyone to post on it. It should be used rather than the "thunderdome" which I understand Patrick had retired. @Patrick, why do you allow Thunderdome to return?