Protest against corporate censorship of public dialogue

▲
6
0
▼

Protest against corporate censorship of public dialogue

invite response
2017 Oct 1, 6:23pm 16,888 views 69 comments

I'm quite disturbed that a few corporations can collude to silence ideas that they don't like -- even if those ideas are basically Nazi.

I've taken a copy of the censored dailystormer.com page "A Normie's Guide to the Alt-Right" from the Internet Archive and hosted it on my own site, here:

http://patrick.net/content/stormer.html

Style sheets don't quite work, but you can read the text. And that's the important thing. They tried to prevent you from having the ability to read it, but I'm saying that is wrong. You should have the ability to read it even if our corporate overlords say no. Especially if they say no. I encourage all other websites to also host parts or all of dailystormer.com as a protest.

I'm not a Nazi. Technically Jewish (long story). Just a believer that corporations should not be in actual fact dictating what we can and cannot read online.

#censorship

« First « Previous Comments 60 - 69 of 69 Search these comments

60 joeyjojojunior 2017 Oct 12, 8:55am

mell says

Although those two situations are quite different as explained by Patrick I would be ok with it if the protection would apply to both. It would be huge if we would have a law to protect against political correctness and SJWs at the workplace (or ideally no HR/discrimination laws in the first place).

Every situation is different. But it's clear by how much twisting Patrick has had to do that he doesn't really have a valid reason for his views. He doesn't like Kaepernick or has been brainwashed by the Trump cult.

61 anonymous 2017 Oct 12, 9:11am

That's quite a bit different from NFL players essentially stealing highly valuable media time to promote an agenda that has nothing to do with their own working conditions

——————

This doesn’t make any sense

62 anonymous 2017 Oct 12, 9:12am

At work, yes, unless he has some compliant about his job.

——————

If his employer doesn’t care, then why should you?

Is this how you MAGA?

63 somecrappynumber 2017 Oct 12, 12:17pm

Patrick says

At work, yes, unless he has some compliant about his job.

Let me see if I understand this. So if he punches out at 5:00 then on his own time he can criticize his employer (the memo was called the Ideological echo chamber) send it to everyone within the company (knowing full well it will go viral) and then come back to work with no repercussions? Really?

If your answer is "Yes that's correct", my follow up is, can he do or say anything about his employer on his own time without consequence? Can he say "my boss, John Smith is a Fuckwad", send it to the rest of the company, then next day at work nothing happens?

MisdemeanorRebel 2017 Oct 12, 5:14pm

Patrick says

What you do on your own time should not be used against you at work. But when you are at work, you should just work like you are being paid to.

But none of that has anything to do with the censorship of minority views which corporations are imposing lately.

I feel this way about school teachers also. If they are keeping any 'odd' behavior, like attendance at gay spahouses or whatever, low key, sure.

Now if they appear in video ads on Youtube and on a Billboard for the Gay Spa house, that might be something else. Or wear a thong bikini and serve hot dogs at the beach in the same county in the summer, that might not be good. But if they fly to Florida and do it as a Summer Job, fine.

I'm appalled somebody can be fired for being a swinger or something. You teach Earth Science but can't go to the Trapeze? Not cool.