7
0

Why I'm glad ObamaCare is dead and single payer along with it


               
2018 Feb 6, 8:31am   14,790 views  58 comments

by Goran_K   follow (4)  



4.5 years! Hope that brain cancer clears up on its own!

Comments 1 - 18 of 58       Last »     Search these comments

1   anonymous   2018 Feb 6, 9:40am  

"please let us know as soon as possible" lol
2   Goran_K   @   2018 Feb 6, 9:44am  

anon_4480e says
"please let us know as soon as possible" lol


Thought someone might find that funny.
3   anonymous   2018 Feb 6, 10:00am  

So what are you calling what we have now?

How is it better?
4   Heraclitusstudent   @   2018 Feb 6, 10:02am  

You have a single provider for water and electricity, right? Do you ever get water and electricity?
You have a single road network, right? it's a miracle you can get anywhere.
5   HappyGilmore   @   2018 Feb 6, 10:14am  

Yep, it's amazing that, as bad as others characterize the health care systems of Canada or the UK, they deliver better care (by any measurable result) for ~1/2 the cost.

Personally, I'm typically in favor of systems that deliver better results for less money, but that's just me.
6   Goran_K   @   2018 Feb 6, 10:04am  

errc says
So what are you calling what we have now?

How is it better?


What we have now needs improvement (especially with price transparency), but Leftist want to go the "other way" for full socialized medicine.
7   Goran_K   @   2018 Feb 6, 10:05am  

Heraclitusstudent says
You have a single provider for water and electricity, right? Do you ever get water and electricity?
You have a single road network, right? it's a miracle you can get anywhere.

There were plenty of roads and water before Federal income tax.
Apples and Kiwis.
8   anonymous   2018 Feb 6, 10:07am  

Goran_K says
errc says
So what are you calling what we have now?

How is it better?


What we have now needs improvement (especially with price transparency), but Leftist want to go the "other way" for full socialized medicine.


How is what we have now better?

What changed, and what is different?

Specific questions require specific answers.

Saying but leftists want, is not an answer. May as well just drool #Maga googoo gaga
9   MisdemeanorRebel   @   2018 Feb 6, 10:07am  

We need to make cross-state health insurance legal, and allow companies to collude to create insurance companies for the benefit of employees.

No reason 50 local businesses shouldn't be allowed to combine into a pool and buy or start health insurance for their employees. Other than big Donor Insurance Companies.
10   anonymous   2018 Feb 6, 10:08am  

Goran_K says
Heraclitusstudent says
You have a single provider for water and electricity, right? Do you ever get water and electricity?
You have a single road network, right? it's a miracle you can get anywhere.

There were plenty of roads and water before Federal income tax.
Apples and Kiwis.


So should we make the roads look like the 1900’s? Or are you saying do away with the federal income tax?
11   Tenpoundbass   @   2018 Feb 6, 10:09am  

The Liberal leader of the Donner party, Chewing on Castor beans "It's better than nothing!"
12   Heraclitusstudent   @   2018 Feb 6, 10:15am  

Goran_K says
There were plenty of roads and water before Federal income tax.

What were they paid with?
13   Patrick   @   2018 Feb 6, 10:18am  

Goran_K says
What we have now needs improvement (especially with price transparency)


Amen.

The free market can definitely improve non-emergency health care in the US. What we have now is hidden random prices which are not even the same for every patient of the same provider. "For you? Let's see, I think I'll charge you more than I charge others because you're trying to escape the insurance cartel..."

Insurance should be completely de-coupled from work and from any specific provider. But there's 3.2 trillion (yes, trillion) to be made by hiding prices and fucking over the public. Takes only a tiny sliver of that to get all of Congress to sell out and keep the scam going.
14   anonymous   2018 Feb 6, 10:27am  

TwoScoopsPlissken says
We need to make cross-state health insurance legal, and allow companies to collude to create insurance companies for the benefit of employees.

No reason 50 local businesses shouldn't be allowed to combine into a pool and buy or start health insurance for their employees. Other than big Donor Insurance Companies.


Why should the burden of health care be tasked to employers?

Wouldn’t it be much easier to ban employers from being involved in the healthcare of employees?
15   HeadSet   @   2018 Feb 6, 10:27am  

Free Market Approach:
Allow insurance across state lines
Allow off shore procedures
Allow Catastrophic coverage (paying out of pocket for immunizations and routine medicine would lower costs)
Allow club or employer co-ops to buy medical insurance wholesale

Free for Everyone National Medical Service:
Set up Medical Academies and Medical ROTC where the graduate serve a 5 year commitment and are assigned locations where they are needed.
Set up High School medical tracks to train medics, equipment technicians, dental hygienists and the like
16   anonymous   2018 Feb 6, 10:32am  

HeadSet says
Free Market Approach:
Allow insurance across state lines
Allow off shore procedures
Allow Catastrophic coverage (paying out of pocket for immunizations and routine medicine would lower costs)
Allow club or employer co-ops to buy medical insurance wholesale

Free for Everyone National Medical Service:
Set up Medical Academies and Medical ROTC where the graduate serve a 5 year commitment and are assigned locations where they are needed.
Set up High School medical tracks to train medics, equipment technicians, dental hygienists and the like


Most importantly, do away with the OTC vs prescription barrier.

No free market can exist as long as the government dictates which medicine is legal or illegal, and which cures and remedies require a permission slip from a government approved doctor.

You never hear people suggest these solutions because they get straight to the point at the heart of the issue, and most people are only capable of regurgitating talking points.
17   Patrick   @   2018 Feb 6, 10:34am  

errc says
Why should the burden of health care be tasked to employers?

Wouldn’t it be much easier to ban employers from being involved in the healthcare of employees?


Lol, burden? Employers want it that way, so that employees have the problem of changing insurance when they change jobs.

The enemy is really the US Chamber of Commerce, the biggest lobbyist in DC by a long shot, which is for "strengthening the employer-sponsored system".

https://www.uschamber.com/health-care
18   anonymous   2018 Feb 6, 10:39am  

Patrick says
errc says
Why should the burden of health care be tasked to employers?

Wouldn’t it be much easier to ban employers from being involved in the healthcare of employees?


Lol, burden? Employers want it that way, so that employees have the problem of changing insurance when they change jobs.

The enemy is really the US Chamber of Commerce, the biggest lobbyist in DC by a long shot, which wants "strengthening the employer-sponsored system".


Health Insurance is not a 401k. One does not change insurance when they change jobs, they lose insurance altogether. Poof, gone. Every last cent you ever pissed down that rabbit hole.

What is the ratio of employer provided 401k/retirement investment to “health” “insurance”?

Comments 1 - 18 of 58       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste