13
0

Corona virus (more correctly, Wuhan virus)


 invite response                
2020 Jan 24, 12:33pm   190,551 views  3,372 comments

by Heraclitusstudent   ➕follow (8)   💰tip   ignore  

Anyone wants to risk a bet on the eventual number of sick people? Dead people?

« First        Comments 3,248 - 3,287 of 3,372       Last »     Search these comments

3254   Onvacation   2022 Nov 1, 6:05pm  

The BEST they can hope for is a tribunal.

After the truth, they'll be lucky to avoid the Mussolini treatment by going the Hitler route.

Not even a year ago they were insisting that we take an experimental biologic agent and sign up for a "Vaccine" passport that would restrict our rights and liberty. This was all planned. The truth needs to be uncovered and the planners need to be prosecuted. NO AMNESTY!
3255   Patrick   2022 Nov 1, 7:15pm  

Onvacation says

the planners need to be prosecuted


This should be everyone's main mission in life now.
3258   Patrick   2022 Nov 22, 11:43pm  

https://www.eugyppius.com/p/after-three-years-of-studiously-ignoring?publication_id=268621&post_id=85709470&isFreemail=true


After three years of studiously ignoring obvious patterns, The Science inches closer to acknowledging that viral interference is a thing

A news article at Science throws water on the prospect of an impending SARS-2, RSV and influenza “tripledemic”, pointing to “a growing body of epidemiological and laboratory evidence” which suggests that “SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses often ‘interfere’ with each other.” There is therefore little chance that all three viruses “will peak together and collectively crash hospital systems.”



3266   Onvacation   2022 Dec 14, 9:43am  

Would have been worse if they weren't quintuple jabbed.
3267   RWSGFY   2022 Dec 14, 10:12am  

zzyzzx says





So not THAT long, eh?
3270   HeadSet   2022 Dec 15, 3:24pm  

So we need to put a mask on the dead?
3271   WookieMan   2022 Dec 15, 3:33pm  

HeadSet says

So we need to put a mask on the dead?

This is funny. But at what point to we stop giving it attention and any mention of covid just goes away?

Not from Patnet specifically, but I feel like all the energy towards debunking Covid lies is just feeding the fire. I comment here waaaaay too much on it. We now have ridiculous articles about non-vaccinated people dying more in car accidents... The fuck?

Maybe just ignore it for a bit? Hard, but I'll try, at least here. If the story goes away, so does the revenue....
3272   Patrick   2022 Dec 17, 12:50pm  

Saw this in a store today :



What do they mean?
3273   Patrick   2022 Dec 19, 7:20pm  

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-11/china-s-top-medical-adviser-says-omicron-risks-similar-to-flu?leadSource=uverify+wall


China’s Top Medical Adviser Says Omicron’s Risks Same as Flu

Death rate from omicron variant of Covid 0.1%, Zhong says

Adviser’s comment follows new government line on coronavirus

ByBloomberg News
December 11, 2022, 7:53 AM UTCUpdated onDecember 11, 2022, 12:50 PM UTC

Chinese officials continued to downplay the risks of Covid-19 as restrictions are eased, with a top medical adviser saying the fatality rate from the omicron variant of the virus is in line with influenza.


(paywall after that)
3275   AmericanKulak   2022 Dec 21, 1:07am  

Patrick says





It's only deadly in bars and restaurants if you stand up! If you sit down, there's no chance of getting COVID.
3281   Patrick   2023 Jan 5, 11:15am  

https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/p/the-virus-9-times-more-dangerous


Meaning, the study looked only at the patients with diagnosed myocarditis in 0 to 28 days post Pfizer jab, and compared those with the patients that were already hospitalized with a viral infection (“The adopted ICD-9-CM codes represent conditions most typically induced by a viral infection in the Hospital Authority setting”) and have been, on top, diagnosed with myocarditis while at it! Do you see the “subtle” difference? They compare the otherwise perfectly healthy recipients of the Pfizer jab in the arbitrary 0-28 days post-jab period with the morbidly sick and hospitalized viral infection patients that happen to be diagnosed with myocarditis to boot. Then they follow both categories for 6 months to see who dies and who doesn’t. See a confounder here? Because the “study” authors don’t.

What is a confounder in a study?

A Confounder is an extraneous variable whose presence affects the variables being studied so that the results do not reflect the actual relationship between the variables under study.

That takes care of the lies [4], [6], [7]. By the way, the “study” indicates that there were 240 myocarditis cases post jab, except 121 of those were outside of the 0-28 days window…

The lie [5], that the “study” somehow proved myocarditis risks post SARS-CoV-2 infection, is exposed by the fact that the “study” specifically excluded Covid-diagnosed and compared the jabbed with the viral infection patients from the 2000-2019 pre-Covid era. “The Virus”, then, has nothing to do with Covid.

Next, as we know from clinical studies, 1 in 35 (or 1 in 40) gets at least mild myocarditis following a single Pfizer booster. See my post from Oct. 26, 2022, “"COVID-19 is SEVEN Times More Dangerous for Myocarditis Than Vaccine?" Follow-Up” for further references. That takes care of the lies [1], [2], and [3].

I rest my case.


Another fraudulent paper which exists solely to protect power and profit for Pfizer.

« First        Comments 3,248 - 3,287 of 3,372       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste