13
0

Corona virus (more correctly, Wuhan virus)


 invite response                
2020 Jan 24, 12:33pm   162,496 views  3,355 comments

by Heraclitusstudent   ➕follow (8)   💰tip   ignore  

Anyone wants to risk a bet on the eventual number of sick people? Dead people?

« First        Comments 3,268 - 3,307 of 3,355       Last »     Search these comments

3270   HeadSet   2022 Dec 15, 3:24pm  

So we need to put a mask on the dead?
3271   WookieMan   2022 Dec 15, 3:33pm  

HeadSet says

So we need to put a mask on the dead?

This is funny. But at what point to we stop giving it attention and any mention of covid just goes away?

Not from Patnet specifically, but I feel like all the energy towards debunking Covid lies is just feeding the fire. I comment here waaaaay too much on it. We now have ridiculous articles about non-vaccinated people dying more in car accidents... The fuck?

Maybe just ignore it for a bit? Hard, but I'll try, at least here. If the story goes away, so does the revenue....
3272   Patrick   2022 Dec 17, 12:50pm  

Saw this in a store today :



What do they mean?
3273   Patrick   2022 Dec 19, 7:20pm  

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-11/china-s-top-medical-adviser-says-omicron-risks-similar-to-flu?leadSource=uverify+wall


China’s Top Medical Adviser Says Omicron’s Risks Same as Flu

Death rate from omicron variant of Covid 0.1%, Zhong says

Adviser’s comment follows new government line on coronavirus

ByBloomberg News
December 11, 2022, 7:53 AM UTCUpdated onDecember 11, 2022, 12:50 PM UTC

Chinese officials continued to downplay the risks of Covid-19 as restrictions are eased, with a top medical adviser saying the fatality rate from the omicron variant of the virus is in line with influenza.


(paywall after that)
3275   AmericanKulak   2022 Dec 21, 1:07am  

Patrick says





It's only deadly in bars and restaurants if you stand up! If you sit down, there's no chance of getting COVID.
3281   Patrick   2023 Jan 5, 11:15am  

https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/p/the-virus-9-times-more-dangerous


Meaning, the study looked only at the patients with diagnosed myocarditis in 0 to 28 days post Pfizer jab, and compared those with the patients that were already hospitalized with a viral infection (“The adopted ICD-9-CM codes represent conditions most typically induced by a viral infection in the Hospital Authority setting”) and have been, on top, diagnosed with myocarditis while at it! Do you see the “subtle” difference? They compare the otherwise perfectly healthy recipients of the Pfizer jab in the arbitrary 0-28 days post-jab period with the morbidly sick and hospitalized viral infection patients that happen to be diagnosed with myocarditis to boot. Then they follow both categories for 6 months to see who dies and who doesn’t. See a confounder here? Because the “study” authors don’t.

What is a confounder in a study?

A Confounder is an extraneous variable whose presence affects the variables being studied so that the results do not reflect the actual relationship between the variables under study.

That takes care of the lies [4], [6], [7]. By the way, the “study” indicates that there were 240 myocarditis cases post jab, except 121 of those were outside of the 0-28 days window…

The lie [5], that the “study” somehow proved myocarditis risks post SARS-CoV-2 infection, is exposed by the fact that the “study” specifically excluded Covid-diagnosed and compared the jabbed with the viral infection patients from the 2000-2019 pre-Covid era. “The Virus”, then, has nothing to do with Covid.

Next, as we know from clinical studies, 1 in 35 (or 1 in 40) gets at least mild myocarditis following a single Pfizer booster. See my post from Oct. 26, 2022, “"COVID-19 is SEVEN Times More Dangerous for Myocarditis Than Vaccine?" Follow-Up” for further references. That takes care of the lies [1], [2], and [3].

I rest my case.


Another fraudulent paper which exists solely to protect power and profit for Pfizer.
3292   mell   2023 Feb 7, 4:38pm  

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230203/Pulmonary-morphopathology-in-COVID-19-caused-by-the-B16172-Delta-variant.aspx

Looks like delta was the most aggressive strain, here's to all of us delta deniers, survivors I mean. Cheers!
#pureblood
3293   Patrick   2023 Feb 7, 5:12pm  

That's interesting. I had assumed that the original alpha variant was actually the most dangerous, even if not much more dangerous than the seasonal flu.

So this could explain why everyone in my office got sick in Nov 2019 but few even bothered to stay home, because it was so mild.
3294   mell   2023 Feb 7, 5:20pm  

Patrick says


That's interesting. I had assumed that the original alpha variant was actually the most dangerous, even if not much more dangerous than the seasonal flu.

So this could explain why everyone in my office got sick in Nov 2019 but few even bothered to stay home, because it was so mild.

Thought so too at first. Delta was definitely a 3+ weeks affair for me to shake it off completely. But besides being tired as fuck, winded and the nightsweats I never felt really bad, took only 2 days off work (from home). Would choose it over influenza anytime.
3295   Onvacation   2023 Feb 7, 7:37pm  

Patrick says

That's interesting. I had assumed that the original alpha variant was actually the most dangerous, even if not much more dangerous than the seasonal flu.

The original bioengineered weapon was a dud. It only killed old and sick people, and even then you had to put them on a ventilator and starve them to death.


3299   RWSGFY   2023 Apr 6, 4:45pm  

Fucking cretin of Moscow apparently still believes in coof because he cited "sanitary restrictions" as the reason to not meet with foreign ambassadors in person yesterday. The fucking bellend literally put 60 ft between himself and the audience.

WE NEED A DIFFERENT GREAT CHRISTIAN LEADER ASAP!!!
3300   Patrick   2023 Apr 9, 9:42pm  

https://tessa.substack.com/p/jj-couey-virus-no-virus


Yes, there is such thing as little bits of genetic code that make cells express different things

Yes, those little bits of genetic code can try to program the cell to make copies of themselves

It so happens that modern science calls those things “viruses” while at the same time vastly misrepresenting the actual findings, and greatly downplaying the fact that we don’t know a whole lot

Naturally occurring “viruses” (in quotes, as this word is just a name for a model) aren’t very good at replication, i.e. programming host cells to make perfect copies of themselves

They can try to do that—and in the process, they would temporarily distress the equilibrium and trigger an immune response. A targeted cell would make a very limited number of good copies of the “virus” but it would also spit out a large amount of genetic noise. That process would invoke an immune response and, generally speaking, we are very capable of dealing with all this, as naturally occurring “viral” bits of genetic material floating around are a part of life.

In labs, for experiments, due to how difficult it is to make a naturally occurring virus to properly replicate, the scientists routinely use the so called “viral clones,” which is not a naturally occurring “virus” but a manufactured (“constructed”) artifact

Here is an example of a study to illustrate the point — Simplified methods for the construction of RNA and DNA virus infectious clones ). When the scientists talk about “viruses” in the lab, they usually refer to artificially manufactured smudges of RNA constructed for enhanced replication, etc.

COVID pandemic: what happened there?
J.J. believes that viral clones matching the molecular properties of the model—to which everything was then compared—were sprayed or otherwise released in strategic locations in different countries. This way, the molecular signature of that specific “virus” could be actually “found” and “identified” using widely accepted methods

According to J.J., the main reason for releasing the clones was providing forensic proof of sort, “proving” that the pandemic was real. What was actually making people sick in 2020 is another matter, and it could be a number of things, possibly working in combination

During the interview, J.J. and I compared notes and theories about different factors that could have contributed to making people in select locations feel genuinely ill

Viral clones are better at replication than bit of genetic material floating naturally, and so they might have contributed to creating disease

When it comes to the intentional vs. unintentional nature of causing dramatic sickness, at the very least, we can be sure that whoever did it doesn’t care, or rather cares solely about money, power, and their ultimate goal of pulling through a large scale and very destructive scam
3301   Patrick   2023 Apr 17, 7:31pm  

https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/p/now-you-see-it-now-you-dont-uk-edition





Alas, the UK abruptly stopped reporting on “Covid” deaths to brutally interrupt an already established tradition. How un-British!

I guess, they had it, backing up the outlandish claims with stats, only to be proven liars once and again. Now we will have to go on their word alone that “vaccines” are “safe and effective” and “save lives”.
3302   Patrick   2023 Apr 28, 9:02pm  

https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/status/1651343130992492547?ref_src=patrick.net


'Asymptomatic transmission' study in 2020 out of China using a sample of 10 million persons, showed us that asymptomatic transmission for this COVID virus was a LIE! Fauci et al. all knew it! ...

Asymptomatic transmission lie was to force you to lock down, get masks, and take the fraud mRNA gene shot...

There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases. ...
3305   Patrick   2023 May 9, 7:14pm  

https://slaynews.com/news/mass-recall-issued-covid-tests-declared-unsafe/


Hundreds of thousands of at-home Covid test kits have been recalled after they were found to contain dangerous bacteria.

SD Biosensor Inc. Pilot COVID-19 At-Home Tests are being recalled amid a warning from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

According to the FDA, the tests, distributed by Roche Diagnostics, could lead to a bacterial infection.

Anyone in possession of one of these test kits is being urged to throw it away, according to a new release on the FDA’s website.

The FDA website lists 44 affected lot numbers.

About 500,000 tests were distributed to CVS Health, the FDA reported.


Why would the FDA issue this recall when they have been aggressively trying to kill Americans with the toxxine? To be consistent, they should promote the use of infected swabs like they promote the toxxine.

« First        Comments 3,268 - 3,307 of 3,355       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions