patrick.net

I hope this results in convictions if the charges are true.

thenuttyneutron says

I hope this results in convictions if the charges are true.

do you really have any faith in our criminal justice system?

Who is going to go to court for the DOJ and testify that they witnessed the people actually filling out the mail-in ballots?

Can the post office really make the claim they are 100% sure the ballot was forwarded to the person's forwarding address? Maybe someone inside the postal service plucked it out of the mail instead of sending it on and voted for them.

Of course there's voter fraud just as charged, but with mail-in ballots there's no practical way to prosecute and so, therefore, no fraud deterrence.

thenuttyneutron says

I hope this results in convictions if the charges are true.

I mean no offense by saying this, but you're naive to think we have a functioning criminal justice system. Our judicial system is on par with Mexico's at this point. It's kangaroo courts, and star chambers. It's been this way for a while. Why do you think General Flynn is still dealing with HIS case - and even Flynn isn't really innocent, he's corrupt, but Clinton is far more corrupt, and she will never be touched.

I have a theory that both Parties like to throw erroneous votes under the bus, because they aren't sure where it came from.
It could be a well intentioned person trying to help get their boy elected, or it could be sting to test the integrity of the system.
They get their trophy catch, so they can show proof that there was minimal voter fraud, but they caught them all.
The election isn't being fixed by the well intentioned voting public it's more systemic and collaborative than that.