« First « Previous Comments 41 - 56 of 56 Search these comments
NoCoupForYou saysmell saysCmon man what is this, Somalia?!
Why, if WaPo and Politfact say it is okay, then it must be okay. I agree with the wise, therefore I am wise.
DEBOONKED! Now pardon me while I attend our third session this year on not misgendering a Tranny and the 32 genders, at my Office, we respect Science.
Wait for me here - as you can see, our waiting room stocks the Economist and the Atlantic. A sure sign of Quality.
OK, given your response, I am guessing you are thinking of the "I wasnt allowed in the room" claim which ran for the first few media cycles, but has also has been denied by POTUS counsel when pressed at oral argument. That said, I havent read everything and as I said when I started this, the great lesson of the national enquirer reporting on John Edwards was ...
Cdon is a propaganda plant. No lawyer would ever say that fraud is 'rare'. Also, no lawyer would come to a random blog to look for 'evidence'.
I suppose it is reassuring that somebody is frightened enough to think this is still necessary.
are you fucking kidding me? These poll workers have been doing shenanigans with voters ballots all night, they can see names, but you know who couldn't? The poll watchers who were ordered to stay so far away INSIDE the rooms that they couldn't read shit. And anybody is going to believe that people on the OUTSIDE with 21/21 vision can actually catch a glimpse of "private" data? Seriously, this is just skullduggery at this point. Whatever the legal standards are, it's clear that they obstructed poll watching to the fullest extent and thus the results need to be invalidated.
mell saysare you fucking kidding me? These poll workers have been doing shenanigans with voters ballots all night, they can see names, but you know who couldn't? The poll watchers who were ordered to stay so far away INSIDE the rooms that they couldn't read shit. And anybody is going to believe that people on the OUTSIDE with 21/21 vision can actually catch a glimpse of "private" data? Seriously, this is just skullduggery at this point. Whatever the legal standards are, it's clear that they obstructed poll watching to the fullest extent and thus the results need to be invalidated.
I wonder if anyone in the room that was put so far back, challenged every ballot every working in the room picked up?
Poll Watcher
"I contest that ballot the signatures don't match!"
Poll worker
"How can you tell, you're too far back to see it!"
Poll Watcher
"EXACTLY! so bring it over there so I can see it!"
I wonder if anyone in the room that was put so far back, challenged every ballot every working in the room picked up?
Poll Watcher
"I contest that ballot the signatures don't match!"
Poll worker
"How can you tell, you're too far back to see it!"
Poll Watcher
"EXACTLY! so bring it over there so I can see it!"
Is Trump the right guy to do cleanup?
Cdon is a propaganda plant.
I disagree. He's a legit old-time user (2012) of patrick.net back under a separate name.
« First « Previous Comments 41 - 56 of 56 Search these comments
https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?v=2774849979467215&ref=notif¬if_id=1605804969206932¬if_t=live_video
As of a minute ago video link has been removed by facebook. 1984
Amount of fraud in Michigan and Wisconsin is out of this world.
- When Republican poll watchers left in Michigan, democrats pulled in trucks of ballots and started scanning them 3 at a time, they didn't have enogh time to full fill them out so they just filled in the president bubble, not the rest of the ballot even.
- Similar situation in Wisconsin and Georgia
Hundreds of witnesses.
Democrats are turning America into a banana republic, stealing election. Started with BLM beating people down telling them they'll be burned down if they vote for Trump, but that wasn't enough, so they are stuffing ballot boxes.