Conspiracy Theory
invite response
2021 Jan 10, 4:52pm 4,770 views 46 comments
by GreaterNYCDude ➕follow (2) 💰tip ignore
I need a diversion. What's yours conspiracy theory du jour? The crazier the better.
« First « Previous Comments 41 - 46 of 46 Search these comments
41
Bd6r
2021 Jan 25, 9:19pm
Bd6r
2021 Jan 25, 9:19pm
Patrick says
will look up tomorrow if i can find it
Got a link to statistics that have not yet been corrupted?
will look up tomorrow if i can find it
42
Onvacation
2021 Jan 25, 9:29pm
Onvacation
2021 Jan 25, 9:29pm
Patrick says
Here's the CDC's own numbers.
https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/Provisional-COVID-19-Death-Counts-by-Sex-Age-and-S/9bhg-hcku
Got a link to statistics that have not yet been corrupted?
Here's the CDC's own numbers.
https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/Provisional-COVID-19-Death-Counts-by-Sex-Age-and-S/9bhg-hcku
43
Bd6r
2021 Jan 26, 9:03am
Bd6r
2021 Jan 26, 9:03am
Patrick says
@Patrick,
this will require some calculations and analysis, but here they are, and all data are from CDC - I believe their data are correct, but interpretations by journalwhores are suspect.
1. Corona: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html
Please see table 1, scenario 5. These are possibilities of death after contracting corona
0-19 years: 0.00003
20-49 years: 0.0002
50-69 years: 0.005
70+ years: 0.054
2. Flu (this does change by year, but lets pick 2014/15)
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/2014-2015.html
lets do some calculations: age group 0-17, ca. 9.6M illnesses, ca. 800 deaths, my maths say that the possibility of death is 0.00008. TWICE LARGER THAN FOR CORONA!!!!
You can work out the numbers, but corona appears to be more deadly only for old people. Furthermore, 2014/15 was not a year for more deadly flu strains such as H1N1.
Follow the science, they said...but apparently science we are following is woke Democrat science where 2+2=5
Got a link to statistics that have not yet been corrupted? I myself cannot believe that the virus is at all dangerous given that I still do no know anyone who got sick, much less seriously ill.
@Patrick,
this will require some calculations and analysis, but here they are, and all data are from CDC - I believe their data are correct, but interpretations by journalwhores are suspect.
1. Corona: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html
Please see table 1, scenario 5. These are possibilities of death after contracting corona
0-19 years: 0.00003
20-49 years: 0.0002
50-69 years: 0.005
70+ years: 0.054
2. Flu (this does change by year, but lets pick 2014/15)
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/2014-2015.html
lets do some calculations: age group 0-17, ca. 9.6M illnesses, ca. 800 deaths, my maths say that the possibility of death is 0.00008. TWICE LARGER THAN FOR CORONA!!!!
You can work out the numbers, but corona appears to be more deadly only for old people. Furthermore, 2014/15 was not a year for more deadly flu strains such as H1N1.
Follow the science, they said...but apparently science we are following is woke Democrat science where 2+2=5
« First « Previous Comments 41 - 46 of 46 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,261,244 comments by 15,059 users - Al_Sharpton_for_President, DOGEWontAmountToShit, ForcedTQ, Patrick, Tenpoundbass online now