patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,362,114 comments by 15,735 users - HANrongli online now
Comments 1 - 5 of 5 Search these comments
1
Tenpoundbass
2021 Feb 23, 12:04pm
Tenpoundbass
2021 Feb 23, 12:04pm
This was my reply to his discrediting any Conservative information that doesn't align with his list of valid MSM sources.
Just how do you think the Nazis controlled all of the information.
How did the Bolsheviks control all of the information?
How did the Color Guard control all of the information?
How did Hugo Chavez control all of the information?
They Criminalized information that conflicted with their message.
If you're comfortable with the Left branding every last Conservative website as Conspiracy theory, then you're a bad student of History. Since when is it cool for one News organization well all of the news organizations to gang up on news organizations that don't align with them? How was it the other news outlets power to tell the White House who can and can't be in the press pool?
If this doesn't shake you to your core then you're beyond complicit when the Communists, Nazis or worse take over.
It doesnt' stop with written word news, they are out to get every conservative news off Cable as well.
Media Matters Campaign to Deplatform Fox, OAN, and News Max News Off Cable and Satellite Systems Gains Ground With Democrat Hearing in Congress This Week. Let me know if you have heard about that.
So just for my records, name one single Conservative news outlet that does get the Left's blessing. Or should all Conservative talk be Thought Crime punishable by imprisonment to the gulags?
Joe and Jim throw in their own commentary, but the news stories they report, are actual Tweets, Congressional and Committee footage, and Interviews from the pols, it's all first hand news. There commentary could be a leading jab or a trailing jab. But I know what it is, I either agree or I don't. I think they miss the point often. But it doesn't negate what they are reporting on. They always present it without any editorial liberties, other than pre or post comment blurbs. And they are the only people on the planet reporting these stories. While all of the MSM you listed above are fawning over Joe Biden breaking a leg playing with his dog.
Like the Ted Cruz deflection going to Mexico. Name one time in the past where it was the Senator from the state where a Natural disaster took place, to show up and do anything. It's always on the Governor, and the President. First the Gov, then the Pres, the Pres shows up and issues an emergency order, then provided FEMA funds.
It was just reported today, that Joe Biden will not be declaring a State of Emergency to Texas. That has killed over 21 people and left millions without power or running water.
Just how do you think the Nazis controlled all of the information.
How did the Bolsheviks control all of the information?
How did the Color Guard control all of the information?
How did Hugo Chavez control all of the information?
They Criminalized information that conflicted with their message.
If you're comfortable with the Left branding every last Conservative website as Conspiracy theory, then you're a bad student of History. Since when is it cool for one News organization well all of the news organizations to gang up on news organizations that don't align with them? How was it the other news outlets power to tell the White House who can and can't be in the press pool?
If this doesn't shake you to your core then you're beyond complicit when the Communists, Nazis or worse take over.
It doesnt' stop with written word news, they are out to get every conservative news off Cable as well.
Media Matters Campaign to Deplatform Fox, OAN, and News Max News Off Cable and Satellite Systems Gains Ground With Democrat Hearing in Congress This Week. Let me know if you have heard about that.
So just for my records, name one single Conservative news outlet that does get the Left's blessing. Or should all Conservative talk be Thought Crime punishable by imprisonment to the gulags?
Joe and Jim throw in their own commentary, but the news stories they report, are actual Tweets, Congressional and Committee footage, and Interviews from the pols, it's all first hand news. There commentary could be a leading jab or a trailing jab. But I know what it is, I either agree or I don't. I think they miss the point often. But it doesn't negate what they are reporting on. They always present it without any editorial liberties, other than pre or post comment blurbs. And they are the only people on the planet reporting these stories. While all of the MSM you listed above are fawning over Joe Biden breaking a leg playing with his dog.
Like the Ted Cruz deflection going to Mexico. Name one time in the past where it was the Senator from the state where a Natural disaster took place, to show up and do anything. It's always on the Governor, and the President. First the Gov, then the Pres, the Pres shows up and issues an emergency order, then provided FEMA funds.
It was just reported today, that Joe Biden will not be declaring a State of Emergency to Texas. That has killed over 21 people and left millions without power or running water.
2
Karloff
2021 Feb 23, 1:50pm
Karloff
2021 Feb 23, 1:50pm
People who dismiss due to source instead of debating on facts provided cannot be reasoned with. "Claims" from any source without evidence backing them up have no weight to them. Showing someone a video of the cops opening the gates and allowing people in is pretty damning to any claims of "insurrection" or "storming". Trespass and some vandalism are really all that's there. The worst act of violence was committed by the cop that shot that woman. Compare this to any cop who shot someone during BLM riots who gets doxxed and called out by the establishment, this guy gets utmost protection instead.
Compare the "insurrection" to videos of BLM riots over the past year and you can't honestly state this was and that wasn't at the same time.
At this point, as soon as someone refuses to even look at evidence because it's from a source they've been programmed to reject, I dismiss them as lost causes. I won't waste my time on these people.
They are completely unable to see that the media labels ANY source of opposing information as "conspiracy theory" and flags it as a site of misinformation. This makes adhering to their demands impossible, by design.
Compare the "insurrection" to videos of BLM riots over the past year and you can't honestly state this was and that wasn't at the same time.
At this point, as soon as someone refuses to even look at evidence because it's from a source they've been programmed to reject, I dismiss them as lost causes. I won't waste my time on these people.
They are completely unable to see that the media labels ANY source of opposing information as "conspiracy theory" and flags it as a site of misinformation. This makes adhering to their demands impossible, by design.
3
Tenpoundbass
2021 Feb 23, 2:02pm
Tenpoundbass
2021 Feb 23, 2:02pm
Karloff says
Agreed this guy is impossible, he sees no hypocrisy.
They are completely unable to see that the media labels ANY source of opposing information as "conspiracy theory" and flags it as a site of misinformation. This makes adhering to their demands impossible, by design.
Agreed this guy is impossible, he sees no hypocrisy.
5
Tenpoundbass
2021 Feb 23, 2:04pm
Tenpoundbass
2021 Feb 23, 2:04pm
His sad parhelic doubling down on the Uni Media, that he claims doesn't exist.
____________________________________________
The website you are referencing below is a well-known alt-right fake news website. Jim Hoft is considered equivalent to Alex Jones and infowars. He questioned and continues to suggest that the Parkland shooting didn't happen. Everything he says, writes, and publishes is literally false. You have to find a legitimate news source that is governed by federal law regarding the press. If we can't agree on what is fact and what is not, we cannot agree to disagree. If you believe that every legitimate news source in the US (AP, Reuters, WSJ, ABC, NBC, NPR, CSM) are all fake, and this guy and his clearly alt-right website is not fake, how do we move forward in discussion?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gateway_Pundit
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ajdellinger/2021/02/06/twitter-suspends-gateway-pundit-jim-hoft/?sh=68e888343653
Twitter suspends ‘Gateway Pundit’ Jim Hoft
Jim Hoft, founder and editor of the far-right publication The Gateway Pundit, was suspended from Twitter Saturday evening for violating the platform’s rules on civic integrity.
www.forbes.com https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-115hhrg33122/html/CHRG-115hhrg33122.htm
_____________
This was my original email to him.
From: t
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 12:14 PM
To: a
Subject: Share Gab Share TelegramShare PShare Email Despite Reports by Dishonest ‘Fact Checkers’ – January 6th Was NOT an ‘Armed Insurrection’
Not one person has been charged with possessing or using a gun inside the Capitol. Further, no one has been identified as carrying a gun inside the building. Of the hundreds of photographs posted on the FBIs Most Wanted List for the Capitol breach investigation, not a single picture shows anyone with a firearm.
Only one defendant had a handgun on his person outside the building hours after the “insurrection” ended. The other defendant had two guns on his person but investigators don’t allege he was inside the Capitol on January 6.
At least 100,000 attended Trump’s speech that day; fewer than 1,000 “stormed” the Capitol. A few hundred have been arrested and only 14 face weapons charges. Those “deadly and dangerous” weapons include two baseball bats, a can of pepper spray, a walking stick/stun gun, an axe, a few fire extinguishers (one in question), a helmet, a riot shield, and a collapsible baton. And at no time did this random weaponry pose a lethal threat to lawmakers inside the Capitol.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/despite-dishonest-fact-checkers-say-january-6th-not-armed-insurrection/