by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 1,049 - 1,088 of 1,289 Next » Last » Search these comments
Check out this headline from The Guardian, along with the photo used in the story, and then check out bodycam footage and what REALLY happened.
...
This man-sized teenager with a freaking hoe/scythe charged at and tried to murder a police officer!
With a scythe!
https://notthebee.com/article/you-think-you-hate-journalists-enough-california-officer-shoots-and-kills-boy-15-holding-gardening-tool
Check out this headline from The Guardian, along with the photo used in the story, and then check out bodycam footage and what REALLY happened.
...
This man-sized teenager with a freaking hoe/scythe charged at and tried to murder a police officer!
With a scythe!
On May 24, 2020, The New York Times published a dramatic, visually-arresting front page proclaiming U.S. DEATHS NEAR 100,000, AN INCALCULABLE LOSS and followed by names of dead Americans who were reportedly felled by a novel coronavirus.
... I revisited "An Incalculable Loss” as part of my ongoing inquiry into the New York City mass casualty event of spring 2020.1 My analysis of its key features, content, purpose, and effect follows. I highlight the
Vague and misleading headline
Imprecise terms for the virus and disease
Strategic use of war imagery and language
Endorsement of unconstitutional, unethical, and immoral policies
Unsubstantiated claims refuted or unsupported by evidence
Mystery methods for selecting obituaries ...
Since 8,000 people die each day in the United States, the list of 1,000 deaths may make for a shocking display but it is not evidence of an outbreak or pandemic. In truth, most towns and counties didn’t experience high excess death in these weeks - or even much increase in death at all.
Whatever the methods, the decedents selected for the NYT list were chosen with a purpose in mind: Persuade readers that America was experiencing a devastating disease-spread event and needed new treatments, including a shot.
Schiff, who was the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, became NPR’s guiding hand, its ever-present muse. By my count, NPR hosts interviewed Schiff 25 times about Trump and Russia. During many of those conversations, Schiff alluded to purported evidence of collusion. The Schiff talking points became the drumbeat of NPR news reports.
But when the Mueller report found no credible evidence of collusion, NPR’s coverage was notably sparse. Russiagate quietly faded from our programming.
It is one thing to swing and miss on a major story. Unfortunately, it happens. You follow the wrong leads, you get misled by sources you trusted, you’re emotionally invested in a narrative, and bits of circumstantial evidence never add up. It’s bad to blow a big story.
What’s worse is to pretend it never happened, to move on with no mea culpas, no self-reflection. Especially when you expect high standards of transparency from public figures and institutions, but don’t practice those standards yourself. That’s what shatters trust and engenders cynicism about the media.
Russiagate was not NPR’s only miscue.
In October 2020, the New York Post published the explosive report about the laptop Hunter Biden abandoned at a Delaware computer shop containing emails about his sordid business dealings. With the election only weeks away, NPR turned a blind eye. Here’s how NPR’s managing editor for news at the time explained the thinking: “We don’t want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories, and we don’t want to waste the listeners’ and readers’ time on stories that are just pure distractions.”
But it wasn’t a pure distraction, or a product of Russian disinformation, as dozens of former and current intelligence officials suggested. The laptop did belong to Hunter Biden. Its contents revealed his connection to the corrupt world of multimillion-dollar influence peddling and its possible implications for his father.
The laptop was newsworthy. But the timeless journalistic instinct of following a hot story lead was being squelched. During a meeting with colleagues, I listened as one of NPR’s best and most fair-minded journalists said it was good we weren’t following the laptop story because it could help Trump. ...
« First « Previous Comments 1,049 - 1,088 of 1,289 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,248,717 comments by 14,891 users - Blue online now